Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nah, power noses over at about 6800.

From what I have seen and experienced the standard cams fall over at approx. 6,000rpm.

Although a lot of cars feel as though they are still pulling away strongly after 6k, mine included, a dyno graph will show power on the decline after that mark.

A good example is Troys RB20 who from memory makes peak power between 6-6.2krpm. But shifts far north of 7,000rpm on occasions.

Surely a much larger turbo would change the power band a bit?

Nope, only cam timing does this and duration and lift. I fitted a GT30 on my car and peak power is the same as it was when I had the standard t3 which means my car is acutually a lot slower down low now because now the cam timing events are still the same ie too early for the GT30.

Turbo provides airflow.

Cam timing determines when this airflow is most efficient.

If you fit big turbo, it will want will not change when the cams open at a certain rpm and thus you will still have peak power at the same rpm. This may not be the case however if your orginal turbo was really shit and couldnt provide enough air through the cams efficiency range.

Larger exhaust housings create less back pressure that improves top end VE. This in affect will help extend where peak power is made.

A good example is the rb20 turbo on the rb30det. lol.

Peak power is made by 4400rpm then goes flat and falls off rapidly after ~4900rpm.

The larger exhaust housings raise peak power to around 5800-6000rpm.

Back pressure = reversion.

The stock log manifold = back pressure + unequal reversion.

Which is why an equal length exhaust manifold is best for peak rpm power.

So realistically if you want to keep the stock log manifold keep the cam specs mild.

If you really want to extend your peak power you must not only do cams but also look at your exhaust manifold, ensure the turbo exhaust housing can handle the higher airflow at highrpm.

Possibly why Roy's power looks so awesome.

Nicely sized exhaust a/r equiv to .7 something from memory + a nice exhaust manifold. All he needs now is a nice set of cams. :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
×
×
  • Create New...