Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not a great idea but these are more for longevity rather than response. The bearings add weight to the rotating parts. A good plain bearing should have no contact as it floats in the viscous oil pulled around the journal. It will not last as long though, but well cared for will give a good life.

Interesting.

So a plain bearing turbo would be more responsive than a ball bearing turbo of the exact same size?

I'm curious to know as I have the opportunity to buy a brand new steel wheel'd plain bearing turbo or get a GCG hiflow. The new plain bearing is significantly cheaper though.

I can't work out something ....

is it:

Turbos which keep spinning

OR

Turbos that keep spinning

I guess it depends on whether your car is a twin turbo or a single turbo

:cheers:

Well the bearing will add extra mass that resists acceleration, either positive or negative. This in in the form of the rollers/balls (depending on construction) and the inner race over the shaft. I have seen needle rollers in a different low speed application that run on the shaft itself.

Plain bearing application is well advanced, and the shaft basically runs on hydrodynamic oil pressure without contacting metal. The bearing metal is there as a soft surface for when the parts touch, which it will eventually from time to time as the bearing ages.

It's a choice of longevity, but plains last years and many miles when well cared for.

Cubes , SB8006A CHRA ? . I dug through all the good and not so good GT30 CHRA no's eg 700177-10,11,12,13,14,15,18 and the best 700382-12 . What does that number you gave show or what listing is it from . I've been trying to remember the name of the turbo dealer in north QLD as his site used to have some early Garrett parts lists .

Cheers A

Sorry that last one (GT30R) should have read CHRA no 700177-7 , for turbo assembly no 700382-12 . There are at least 14 GT30 turbine based cartridges I know of and have the part numbers for 11 0f them . Compressors range from GT35 to GT37 to T04S to GT40 .

Cheers A .

Sorry.. I grabbed that number from Ray Hall. His listings appear to be different to that of Garrett them selves. ?!? :wave:

The real part number for the chra is 700177-0014 according to Ray Hall.

I don't understand to be honest as Garrett don't list a GT30R that runs a 64trim comp wheel?!?

Comp: 64trim GT40 comp wheel 2.41(61.21mm)/3.22(81.78mm).

Turbine: 84trim 2.16(54.86mm)/2.36(59.94mm).

I really need to do a bit of reading to understand the trim etc..

One good argument i've seen regarding response, is that the bearing design doesn't matter much, but the blade design does.

IMO its incorrect to attribute the better response of modern turbos solely to the use of ball bearings, because the blade designs are years apart in terms of development.

Well the bearing will add extra mass that resists acceleration, either positive or negative. This in in the form of the rollers/balls (depending on construction) and the inner race over the shaft. I have seen needle rollers in a different low speed application that run on the shaft itself.

Plain bearing application is well advanced, and the shaft basically runs on hydrodynamic oil pressure without contacting metal. The bearing metal is there as a soft surface for when the parts touch, which it will eventually from time to time as the bearing ages.

It's a choice of longevity, but plains last years and many miles when well cared for.

Cheers :D thanks for that GTRgeoff. You may have just saved me $1000 :wave:

Cubes the 700177-14 cartridge should have a 56 trim GT40 compressor on it . Most people call them a GT3040R . HKS did a similar thing but with a 50 trim GT40 compressor wheel .

Turbo bearing systems . The annular contact ball bearings have very little contact area with the inner and outer races . The reason they have small oil restrictors is that high speed ball race bearings suffer drag losses if too much oil is present . Clearence on ball race bearings can be much closer than bush bearings in high speed applications meaning less "orbiting" of the shaft . This allows less clearence between the wheels and housings raising the efficiency of the compressor and energy recovery of the turbine - less slip losses .

What happens with floating bushes in turbos is a large contact area between the turbine shaft and the oil cushon . The large contact area initially gives a drag or oil shear effect that slows the acceleration of the rotating assembly from low speeds - lag . The collar and plate thrust bearing also has the large contact area drag problem . If there is a carbon compressor end seal (mechanical face seal) its more drag again .

The reason turbos with very low drag bearing systems contine to revolve when the engines shut down is because the mass of the rotating assembly has little resistance to revolving for a short time . The lubricating oil is hot and thin as well .

Cost aside I can't think of any good reason to use a bush bearing turbo if a ball bearing alternative is available .

Lastly would you believe me if I said Garretts GTBB turbos have a lower part count than the bush bearing ones ? Believe it .

That all makes sense to me so I won't dispute it except one bit.

As far as the BB part count goes, I assume each bearing cartridge is a single part, where if you said moving parts it would be different.

Well the bearing will add extra mass that resists acceleration, either positive or negative. This in in the form of the rollers/balls (depending on construction) and the inner race over the shaft. I have seen needle rollers in a different low speed application that run on the shaft itself.

Plain bearing application is well advanced, and the shaft basically runs on hydrodynamic oil pressure without contacting metal. The bearing metal is there as a soft surface for when the parts touch, which it will eventually from time to time as the bearing ages.

It's a choice of longevity, but plains last years and many miles when well cared for.

White bearing metal is very expensive to replace also when it wears out

spinning it with your hand would be alot slower than it spins when being pushed by exaust gas. Also doing it once or twice with your fingers wouldnt matter, but doing it everytime you turn your car off, can't be good for it?

yeah thats exactly what i was saying, having exhaust gasses pushing it means there is load behind the turbine wheels, but in this instance the car is off and it keeps spinning because the inertia of the rotating parts is enough to overcome the friction of the bearings. of course the friction will slowly turn the inertia into heat and transfer the energy to the oil and bearings over the period that it keeps spinning after the car is off, once that energy is expended it will stop spinning as its converted all its energy into heat.

now if there was enough energy it can be argued that it will cause damage as there is no longer a proper oil supply, but its not really its a very negligible amount of energy when the engine is off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...