Jump to content
SAU Community

Aftermarket radiator caps and oil cap! Do they WORK?


West
 Share

Recommended Posts

After i put on a NISMO 1.3bar radiator cap ive replaced the radiator top tank, 3 hoses near the rear of the engine and split two hoses at the front of the engine. oh well..blessing in disguise I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah I would say that was helping drag up the water temp a bit too. i guess they both feed off each other to a degree and once they start to go up it's a bad cycle. having done a few track days this year and even a 10 lap race (including comp pitstop etc) i haven't got oil temp over 95 and water temp never over 83. i think the duct and giving the air an escape will help a lot.

Are you running std turbos? I'm running the factory ones at 1 Bar - I think the ball bearing turbos run cooler.

Also, you're right if I get the water temps under control then the oil temps fall off too (and vice versa).

I'm pretty sure the readings are right, as i've got defi gauges for pressure, oil temp and water temp.

However, the readings are temps as they exit the engine - the top hose for the rad, and in the remote oil filter block before the cooler. It would be nice to have a reading after the oil cooler and at the bottom rad hose to see what temps the engine actually sees.

Another thing I was thinking was that the engine is running a bit lean, but then the A/F ratios are good at bang on 12:1

Therefore, my conclusions are:

1. the oil cooler is poorly placed

2. the rad is either partially blocked or can't cope with the heat - going to go for a 43mm one anyway

Dyno_220305.jpg

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as i understand, radiator caps have that releif of

pressure for a reason(to keep the pressure to a safe

level in your engine) to save head gaskets and hoses,

they are meant to bleed coolant into the overflow

bottle and then suck it back when the engine cools

down.

othewise the coolant level would be to low when

cold and there would be no reason for an overflow

bottle at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

West,

 

Have you got a 'real' temperature guage to determine if the car is getting hot or not?

 

The stock temp guage is a 3 stage. Its either cold in the middle or hot.

 

For example the temperature range in the middle is from 72degree's right up to 102degree's from memory.

 

102degree's I would consider to be too hot, especially if it is reaching these temps on the street. On the track sure, lap after lap on a stock cooling system will see these temps but definitely not on the street.

Yes i have PFC handcontroller so i can tell exactly. On Phillip Island, after 4 laps mine only read 87c compare to average normal driving of 80c and i also have an oil cooler too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Opened up the cluster to inspect the gauge itself for signs of damage and it looks good. Got curious since that needle doesn't go back to a "neutral" position by itself (it stays in the same position when ignition is off. so I manually moved it to 1/2. Connected it back, turned on the ignition and the needle started moving up! Not sure what's up with that but before that the needle was way down below empty like fully south west. There's always a chance that the needle moved slightly the first time I tried and I didn't notice because of how slowly it moves and how far it was from the markings. I don't know if the current needle position is accurate so I'll fill it up and see where that brings it. I guess I'll try to adjust it manually if it doesn't get to F. Looks like the needle position is relative and not absolute? Thanks all for your help and patience!
    • You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
    • I can think of two places in my city of <1.5million population that specialise in automotive instrument repairs.Unless you're out in the wilds of Quebec, you have 3 major Canadian and 3 major US cities within the same distance as the single nearest city to mine. Surely there is somewhere you could send it.
    • I never cared for twins but whenever these conversations came up, I always presumed the higher number represented a larger turbo. Learn something new everyday. 
    • Interesting, I've never seen a failure like that before but with the age of these cars and the general questionable-ness of all kinds of parts these days you can't rule anything out I suppose. Boost leak testing the boost control system would've revealed this though.
×
×
  • Create New...