Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

From what i heard the other day, the power fc will run with the auto but you have to manually shift the auto once it is done. A place called M V Auto's do it, and its around the $300 mark i think. It's just a lil black box that takes control of the gearbox and lets the power fc do it's own thing with everything else. He does awesome work, and even HPI or Zoom are using him at the moment with their rb26 4 door skyline they are doing. He has no website, but here is his address and number : Unit 3/1 Stirling Road, Blackwood, SA, 5051. Phone:. (08) 8370 0430. For a full rebuild in most auto cars, it is around $2600 but that is a full rebuild, carbon clutches, more cluches per gear, upgraded stally, stage 1 or 1.5 shift kit, service lockup clutch etc. That for the 1jz auto will hold 330+kw so i'd ring him and ask about the skyline ones, but i can't see there'd be too much difference

Hope that helps

That is correct LINK is the brand ..... you want a "GTSLink" for your skyline, they replace the factory computer inside the actual ecu's case..... totally stock from the outside.

Works with auto not a prob.... no mods necessary. You just select "auto" in the setup of it. It allows extra fuel percentage to be added when in Drive. Also it stops the idle control from trying to increase rpm to the idle value when in drive.

Gary

does the link back off the timing during gear changes?

hehe the link vs powerfc is still un-answered from the last posts from cubes

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=79922

perhaps you can shed some light on it and answer some of them

No the link doesn't back the timing off on gearchanges. From an engine point of view there is no need if tuned correctly at all load points.

But i guess you ask as you want it to soften the power to the auto on the change ?

My way of thinking is if your putting in an alternate to factory, generally your looking for power, so why not add the shift kit to the auto and not worry about it.

Doing data logging it seems the auto takes a full second to shift , thats from the time the revs start to drop till they start to climb again. (foot flat). Shift kit will be here next week so i'll let you's know how it changes the time.

Gary

No ignition retard on gearshift (auto) means harsh gearchanges and premature wear of the 2nd gear belt and 3rd and 4th gear clutches. The gearchanges are rough on heavy throttle and uncomfortable on light throttle. Adding a shift kit, upgraded valve body or stronger belt/clutches makes no improvement to the quality of the gearchange. In fact the tigher (shorter) shift makes the lack of ignition retard even more obvious/noticeable.

In that regard I have tried autos with Wolf, Power FC. Motec, Autronic and Microtec and none are any better than any other. I have no reason to believe that Link would be any better. I have investigated and tested a number of cars because I have an auto Stagea (we use it to tow the race car) and I wanted to upgrade the ECU. I have had no success finding an ECU, despite over 12 months of looking. So I have a Jaycar DFA (similar to SAFC) and an Apexi SITC tricking the standard ECU. No loss of shift quality or damage to the auto.

Check out the Stagea section for more details:cheers:

I see your point, but i truly can say the shifts didn't feel any harsher or uncomfortable on light throttle by any means. I'll live with it this week and see how i feel then, as i havn't had it in long(link).

The power is only 150 rwkw's (dynolog ... stock line is about 110 on them. I had 125 rwkw with just exhaust and pod. Gained 45 rwkw's midrange, and 25 top end... no more midrange blues finally)

So, if i was to interface into the auto ecu and detect a gear change then retard the timing externally (custom ignitor with retard input) , what sort of timing would you pull out ?

Gary

  Fastrotor said:
I see your point, but i truly can say the shifts didn't feel any harsher or uncomfortable on light throttle by any means.  I'll live with it this week and see how i feel then, as i havn't had it in long(link).  

The power is only 150 rwkw's (dynolog ... stock line is about 110 on them. I had 125 rwkw with just exhaust and pod. Gained 45 rwkw's midrange, and 25 top end... no more midrange blues finally)

So, if i was to interface into the auto ecu and detect a gear change  then retard the timing externally (custom ignitor with retard input) , what sort of timing would you pull out ?

Gary

Hi Gary, the standard ECU has a very sophisticated map that looks at rpm, throtle position, road speed, load (via the AFM), engine water temp and then calculates the exact amount of ignition retard and/or cut required. The Nissan guys tell me that there is more code in the shift logic program then there is needed to run the engine. There is most certainly not one, single retard amount (like 10 degrees).

I hate piggy backs, they are pain in the ass compromise, but I haven't found a better solution:cheers:

Yes i agree piggyback soloutions arn't the most desirable. But sometimes are the best option for the desired results. As you've pointed out, even if it was an option in an aftermarket comp, the amount of detail would be far less than the stock comp.

I'll look into the external soloution i suggested, if i can find some wiring details on the auto comp and i'll whip up a trial circuit and have a play.... also will get into links ear about it. See if they are sympathetic towards doing it at some stage.

Gary

  Fastrotor said:
Yes i agree piggyback soloutions arn't the most desirable. But sometimes are the best option for the desired results.  As you've pointed out, even if it was an option in an aftermarket comp, the amount of detail would be far less than the stock comp.  

I'll look into the external soloution i suggested, if i can find some wiring details on the auto comp and i'll whip up a trial circuit and have a play....   also will get into links ear about it. See if they are sympathetic towards doing it at some stage.

Gary

Hi Gary, apparently Apexi have been asked a number of times to do a Power FC's for auto Nissans, same as they do for auto Toyotas. From what I heard Apexi can not justify the cost in programming, even amortised over the large number of auto Power FC's they would sell. The programming for the Toyota auto in the engine ECU is apparently nowhere near as complex. That's why there are Power FC's for Toyota autos. I haven't seen any Power FC's for Honda or Mazda autos either, so it's not like Nissan are on their own.

:D

Well to be honest i think a reasonably basic setup would work fine.... have the retard based on tps and revs and map load... all combining ... the bigger each one, the more retard, up to a maximum value. I mean for the most part that would totally suffice i would suggest ..

Can you think of any others that would need to be done ? I can make a board and put it all inside the LINK, so it would be plug and play anyhow once done. The only hard part is determining when a shift is about to happen..... im not sure wheather the comp and auto cpu use straight signals or actually communicate with one another via a serial protocol of sorts... im guessing second option, unfortunately...

I guess i could just look for conditions that indicate a change, ie full load, revs start dropping, tps stable... would take some logging to get an idea really.

(edit thinking about it , looking at revs and tps for the shift indication should work, say if revs drop by 5% without a corresponding tps drop, we could assume a shift is taking place and retard , based on tps pos, map load and revs)

(edit again Might have to put a threshold on map too as i forgot if you drive up a hill, revs can drop and you dont always change your foot position.... lots of datalogging required to analyse different conditions i think)

Gary

  Fastrotor said:
Well to be honest i think a reasonably basic setup would work fine.... have the retard based on tps and revs and map load...  all combining ... the bigger each one, the more retard, up to a maximum value.   I mean for the most part that would totally suffice i would suggest ..

Can you think of any others that would need to be done ?  I can make a board and put it all inside the LINK, so it would be plug and play anyhow once done.  The only hard part is determining when a shift is about to happen..... im not sure wheather the comp and auto cpu use straight signals or actually communicate with one another via a serial protocol of sorts...  im guessing second option, unfortunately...

I guess i could just look for conditions that indicate a change, ie full load, revs start dropping, tps stable...   would take some logging to get an idea really.

(edit   thinking about it , looking at revs and tps for the shift indication should work, say if revs drop by 5% without a corresponding tps drop, we could assume a shift is taking place and retard , based on tps pos, map load and revs)

(edit again  Might have to put a threshold on map too as i forgot if you drive up a hill, revs can drop and you dont always change your foot position.... lots of datalogging required to analyse different conditions i think)

Gary

Hi Gary, as I posted previously this is complex programming, and there is most certainly data interchange between the Auto ECU and the Engine ECU. The ECU pinouts on R33/R34 indicate an even higher level/volume/speed of coms than R32. The Stagea S1 sits between R33 S2 and R34, with the Stagea S2 the same as R34.

:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 馃
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
  • Create New...