Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

In association with RENEW, the Rotary guys, we are having another track day at Wakefield Park on Sunday September 11.

Cost is $130 for members and $160 for non members.

You must get your form and payment in to secure a spot and since RENEW have the jump on us they already have a number of spots taken so you better get in fairly quickly in order to secure a position.

Entry Form

In order to simplify things this time the form goes straight to RENEW if posting, details are on it, however you can still fax the form to us on 9237 0814.

UPDATE

There are only 3 spots left so people need to get their money and forms in ASAP.

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Interested.

I've never been to a track day before, so would be keen to give it a go. Just need to sort a few things out first before deciding to commit to the day.

Just curious, will there be any instructors available on the day?

I wouldn't mind getting some pointers on braking points, driving lines etc as I know I could probably do with some guidance being first time out and all...

John - You've seen it now and there are spots now so that will do. :O Rx7s go pretty quick around a track.

Brendan there will be instructors on the day. There will also be people like me and Duncan and other SAUers who have been to many track days and would be happy to go out with you and show you around.

In fact, the first session is devoted to exactly that. Have a read of the form I've linked to in my signature.

This time you can bring as many people as you like but there is no second driver unless you pay a second fee.

The other thing to take note of for those with no track experience is that Wakefield Park is as safe a track as you will find. The runoff areas are large and flat, the only wall is along the straight so you can't hit that and it would take a pretty serious car to hit 200km/h on it meaning that it takes skill rather than outright power to do well.

Basically it's the best track to learn on and still fun for those with experience.




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...