Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just had a drive in one (passenger). Im sure no gtst will be able to out drag it from the lights. From 40-110km/hr was unbelievable - the push in the seat, the acceleration was dynamic. Had a mildly modded GTS25T and it would have chopped it even from a role. 3rd gear and your going harder than you should be.

the guy driving knew the car very well...............Im not sure, but he says it needs a very well sorted GTR to outcorner it on the track.

Any experiences on the road or on the track with one of these things.

I wasnt expecting that much from a std car.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/84999-taken-on-a-05-wrx-sti-lately/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Was it standard?

The quickest standard WRX (doesn't list what is STI or not, but there are usually a lot of STI's when we go)... is only 2.01 Theres a few gtst's broken the 2min mark at Philip Island...

http://www.wrx.com.au/motorsport/58.php

Was it standard?

The quickest standard WRX (doesn't list what is STI or not, but there are usually a lot of STI's when we go)... is only 2.01 Theres a few gtst's broken the 2min mark at Philip Island...

http://www.wrx.com.au/motorsport/58.php

ferni,

was standard in that there was no engine mods (stock exhaust). I dont think there was any suspension mods either. Have you been on the track at phillip Is. along side an sti?

How have they held up to your GTR?

Im going to have a look at there site and see if they have commented on the gtr or gtst on the road or track.

driven properly an sti should match or beat a standard gtr ...

they have the same power ... but the gtr is a bit of a heavy weight compared to the sti

i dont know but i think the sti would win in the twisties ...

You'll be suprise how fast a stock/untouched STI is around a track, as for straight line performance. I be more concern with a normal wrx with mod, than a sti, as STI owners generally don't mod their car as much.

was reading thru a post where someone on the wrx forum was talking about a Best Motoring video where they had an R34 GTR, EVo 8 (I think) and a WRX STi RA type C and some other cars on the track.

I was surprised, but they said the R34 GTR came 4th and the WRX 1st.

I didnt even think they would be comparable, but there you go.

was reading thru a post where someone on the wrx forum was talking about a Best Motoring video where they had an R34 GTR, EVo 8 (I think) and a WRX STi RA type C and some other cars on the track.

I was surprised, but they said the R34 GTR came 4th and the WRX 1st.

I didnt even think they would be comparable, but there you go.

No, the R34 GTR won the STi and EVO were closing however, R32 GTR got smoked....I 'think' even the NA V35 Skyline beat it the R33 did not fare much better.

In a handling battle standard Sti everytime over standard GTR, only on the more open sweeping stuff will the GTR be better.

I have been on quite a few PerthWRX cruizes / hillclimbs etc now to know how nimble they are.

Straight line I have had a rolling start run with an 04 - 05 STi and my then standard GTR was slightly faster (overtaking it at walking pace), until it hit the 180kmh limiter ;)

Let's not forget this is a WRX valued at 55k plus, against Gts-t's that with some mods maybe 20-25k. Throw an extra 30 grand into a gts-t & it would chop the WRX, except off the launch.

How are the torque figures on STis compared to GTRs?

Higher torque would determine who comes out of the corner better right?

I assume, that if u compare the same model car...i.e 2003 STi vs 2003 GTR the gtr would come out trumps.

Straight line......can't see a GTR loosing (stock on stock) unless the GTR driver bogs it down.

No, the R34 GTR won the STi and EVO were closing however, R32 GTR got smoked....I 'think' even the NA V35 Skyline beat it the R33 did not fare much better.

In a handling battle standard Sti everytime over standard GTR, only on the more open sweeping stuff will the GTR be better.

I have been on quite a few PerthWRX cruizes / hillclimbs etc now to know how nimble they are.

Straight line I have had a rolling start run with an 04 - 05 STi and my then standard GTR was slightly faster (overtaking it at walking pace), until it hit the 180kmh limiter :(

sorry your right. It was the R33 that came 4th. But interestingly it said the sti set the fastest lap time.

What you said was interesting also that your stock GTR and the Sti were pretty much on par to 180km/hr. There was a post earlier by someone that said there stock gts25t got advantage at those speeds while the sti ran out of puff.

Cant believe that as the sti I went in was pulling very hard at those speeds and my mildly modded gts25t would not have kept up. Not even close.

driven properly an sti should match or beat a standard gtr ...

hahahah hahahahahahah ahahha rofl

japs lie about specs

gtr = alot more powerful then an sti!sti = like 210hp and gtr = over 300 or some shit afaik

and more to the point gtr's absolutely kain sti's arouns the track

Edited by nemz

ive noticed when your used to your own car if its only milded modded and a mate takes you for a strap in their car and its much the same it always feels quicker. My mate takes me for a strap in his s14 occassionally and it feels like it pulls harder then my 33...but i axe him every time no matter what. just what your used to i suppose.

was reading thru a post where someone on the wrx forum was talking about a Best Motoring video where they had an R34 GTR, EVo 8 (I think) and a WRX STi RA type C and some other cars on the track.

I was surprised, but they said the R34 GTR came 4th and the WRX 1st.

lies i seen one of those video's with an nsx and rx7(the highest spec one) and the other other rx7, gtr 33 & 34, evo and sti

the high spec rx7 came first just infront of the 34 which started from the rear, then came the nsx, and the low spec rx7 33 and sti/evo made up the rear a fair bit back from the others

you can't really base fact on one race I don't think. All drivers have different abilities so whos to say the 34 driver was the best there and if he;d jumped in the STI would have won in that?

I think the GTR would win anyway but I think the best way is for the one driver to do hot laps around the same track, given a warm up in each car to get used to it then go for it. Even then to be fair this should be done over a number a different types of tracks if you want to find out the best overall car.

When it comes down to it though it doesn't really matter as the majority of skyline, WRX, EVO drivers never even make it to the track and generally use them to cruise around in and drag a few people at lights.

Ive had a race with one from 100k's to 180. we stayed the same till about 160 then the STI run out of legs. My R33-2 gtst was stock at the time

Yeah riiiiiight and then your flux capacitor kicked in and you were gone.

driven properly an sti should match or beat a standard gtr ...

they have the same power ... but the gtr is a bit of a heavy weight compared to the sti

i dont know but i think the sti would win in the twisties ...

That's what I've heard from people who have owned both.

The '05 sti is a huge improvement but I think I'd rather have the GTR thanks if I could afford it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...