Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Bit of a bump, as i' installing an SAFC in the coming weeks.

Predator mentioned to leave the "IN;1 OUT:1", the apexi manual:

http://www.apexi-usa.com/manuals/electronics/safc_manual.pdf

Says to set it to "IN:4 OUT:4", but "maximumrpm" stated that the car stalls when set to 4&4?

Any ideas?

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

im keen to find this out to!

Mines up and running as per Predators guide, but it affects the AFL% as the % readout must be based on what the numbers are set to. No big deal though, everything else works well.

Might add that i'm very happy with the results. Car was dyno'd with an AFR of ~9:1, so took %15 fuel out across the board on the low throttle map, and %10 on the high throttle map. Completely different vehicle! Much more responsive, better on/off boost, smoother all round and definitely more power everywhere. Keen to get it back on the dyno and set-up properly.

Also, the SAFC has alot more features than anyone talks about, although mostly useless/wank factor, stuff like the different monitor displays, peak hold/recall, graphing readouts, and other little things are quite interesting!

  • 3 years later...

Just installed a rsv and safc 2 on my autech stagea, will let peoples know how things go over the next few weeks as I learn / setup

main reason installed is to get better fuel economy on the hi way etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...