Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yoohoo! got 212kw after getting SAFC tuned with Matt (Hitman) yesterday afternoon. Very happy and even Matt was also impressed with the result. Mods are: 3" turbo back zorst, FMIC, 500hp fuel pump (I think was Walbro?) , bleed valve ($30 from forum : ) and SAFC (from ebay). Go cheap mods ! ^^

Anyway as most of you would know with the similar mods a R33 Gtst would normally push up to about high 190kw only. Therefore Matt also said that my car might have a R34 turbo in it (could be fitted back in Japan) coz a R34 gtt would be pushing a similar figure, which is another bonus for me :P

I couldn't tell much difference with the power since yesterday thanks to my granny shifting and the current petrol prices . . . but the result definitely gave me a big confidence to give it a go whenever I need to use it :)post-11488-1126343327.jpgpost-11488-1126343295.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87239-yay-212kw-with-safc/
Share on other sites

yeah thats some high intake temp, will definetly affect "up" the output figure as its in shootout mode, nevertheless if it feels good then its fine. did you notice much change from stock ecu to stock ecu + safc + boost ?

Yeah you r both right! damn I didn't even notice that. It's because after I got my Hybrid copy cooler installed and needed to take that front bit of the air box out (in the way of the new pipe) I've got "True Flow" brand filter (similar to k&n). Anyway its almost like my filter is nearly exposed like a pod. You guys know how much temp would be reduced with a cold box installed?

yeah thats some high intake temp, will definetly affect "up" the output figure as its in shootout mode, nevertheless if it feels good then its fine. did you notice much change from stock ecu to stock ecu + safc + boost ?

boost hits hard as it should be but felt abit jerky. Just like others said a safc tuned car won't drive as smooth as a power fc tuned one. But for the money I spent the power gained is defenitely worth it.

You guys know how much temp would be reduced with a cold box installed?

If you had a true cai that doesn't suck any air from the engine bay, you would drop your intake temps to the same as ambient.

Thats a drop of 27degree's and thats on a dyno with constant airflow.

Sitting in traffic on a 40degree day.. Ouch if you should put the pedal to the metal. :rofl:

The R33 having an upside down airbox makes this difficult. :blink:

Edited by Cubes

aren't intake temps taken from the temp inside the manifold?

if so, either your FMIC isn't connected, or the tuner "turned up" the intake temp value so that it is reading higher

i read somewhere that each 10deg higher intake temp adds on 5-10kW to account for the "Apparent" changes in the atmosphere (the correction that shootout mode does)

when i had my car dynoed last, the intake temps were 15deg on a 15deg day (with FMIC).. the temp proble was palced to read at the manifold...

Warren.

Warren,

The correct method is to place the dyno's air intake temp sensor in the location where the car sucks in the ambient air.

Air intake temps being so high I would suspect the bonnet was closed, a rather wise move when you think about how the safc works.

At every map location you have a fuel value and ignition value tied together.

As you run down the map the car is sucking in more air, as a result running less ignition timing and more fuel.

To lean the car out you tell the ecu it is sucking less air than it really is, as a result you use a lesser load point with a cell that has a higher ignition value and less fuel value.

Ignition timing is the killer, one very good reason to tune with the bonnet down. That way any detonation would have shown up on the dyno. Hopefully.

Wouldn't it be the 'Ambient temperature' reading that would affect how Shootout alters the power figure, not the 'Intake Temperature' reading?

After all shootout is designed to compensate for variables like summer/winter, which ambient temp would indicate, not intake temp. I've heard that some less then reputable workshops will place the ambient probe behind the radiator to artifiically boost the power reading, but of course this would show up on the chart as a high AT figure. The AT looks normal on this one.

Warren,

The correct method is to place the dyno's air intake temp sensor in the location where the car sucks in the ambient air.

Air intake temps being so high I would suspect the bonnet was closed, a rather wise move when you think about how the safc works.

At every map location you have a fuel value and ignition value tied together.

As you run down the map the car is sucking in more air, as a result running less ignition timing and more fuel.

To lean the car out you tell the ecu it is sucking less air than it really is, as a result you use a lesser load point with a cell that has a higher ignition value and less fuel value.

Ignition timing is the killer, one very good reason to tune with the bonnet down. That way any detonation would have shown up on the dyno. Hopefully.

Wow u r right cubes! Matt did have the bonnet closed. He also had the other mechanic standing near my car to hear the knocking. The car got a max run at 213 something kw but was winded down a little just to be safe. Matt is a pro, he doesnt just set the car up just to push out maximum power but rather tune it at a reasonable and safe level.

Wouldn't it be the 'Ambient temperature' reading that would affect how Shootout alters the power figure, not the 'Intake Temperature' reading?

After all shootout is designed to compensate for variables like summer/winter, which ambient temp would indicate, not intake temp. I've heard that some less then reputable workshops will place the ambient probe behind the radiator to artifiically boost the power reading, but of course this would show up on the chart as a high AT figure. The AT looks normal on this one.

The car doesn't ingest ambient air.. It ingests intake air. :D

The hotter the air the less dense it is, as a result the less power the car will make, this is where the dyno makes small adjustments.

The power figure is 'around' the mark, thats all that really matters.

The car doesn't ingest ambient air.. It ingests intake air. :(

The hotter the air the less dense it is, as a result the less power the car will make, this is where the dyno makes small adjustments.

The power figure is 'around' the mark, thats all that really matters.

I understand that. However, 'intake air' temp is based on the efficiency and design of the cars induction system - the dyno should not be compensating for this. Ambient air temp is what the dyno should be compensating for because this is what will vary depending upon the weather at the time of the dyno run.

By the way, I'm not 100% sure the above is correct it's simply what seems logical to me. Thanks for humouring me. :)

The Dyno Dynamics Shoot Out mode system was designed so that I could dyno my car in Tasmania in winter and in Darwin in summer and get the same power readings. To do that it has to measure both the inlet air temperature and the ambient air temperature

Some clarification might help here;

1. The inlet air temperature sensor (on the Dyno Dynamics) is for measuring the temperature of the air going into the air filter. It is NOT the temperature of the air going into the engine (after turbo, intercooler etc). It is there for correction purposes, to allow for differences in the temperature of the air that the engine gets and therefore the power readings it gives.

2. The ambient air temperature sensor on the Dyno Dynamics is for measuring the temperature of the air in the dyno room. This is the temperature of the air that flows through the radiator, the oil cooler, the intercooler etc. This is important as it affects the temperature of the air out of the intercooler and the running temperature of the engine.

Without both of these temperature inputs, the DD software would not be able to equalise the temperature differences.

Hope that was of some help

:( cheers :)

Cheers SK - that clears it up. If that's the way it works, then that's the way it works I guess.

Still it seems that it would make more sense to only use the ambient temperature figure, as the difference between AT and IT would be due to the efficiency of the vehicles induction system which should not be compensated for.

Only using AT would still allow for different weather conditions to be compensated for. (Winter/summer, Tasmania/QLD, etc)

To demonstrate what I'm saying -

Vehicle A and Vehicle B both produce the same power. Vehicle A has a great induction system, Vehicle B has a poor one.

Vehicle A dyno's with AT 25 and IT 30.

Vehicle B dyno's with AT 25 and IT 50.

Even though the actual power is the same, Vehicle B will get a higher Shootout power figure as it is "rewarded" for it's craptastic induction. Seems silly to me.

Does that make sense or am I completely missing the ball?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...