Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well last night i cracked my block in cyclinder 3 right down the bore after making 688hp at the wheels without the NOS on not reved out, the block was a nismo N1 block which we just fitted in after cracking the std one, so looks like the nismo ones are not as strong after all, i was told today that u can get a stronger block called the group a block does anyone have any ideas where these can be bought from?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/88010-nismo-n1-block/
Share on other sites

it was a std nismo n1 block, but we have weigh the std gtr33 block and the nismo one and there is no difference in weight thats why its got me wondered if there any different, the most i have made is just over 800hp in all four wheels and she was holding.

There is certainly a difference in price between the std (05U) and the N1(24U) blocks!

I thought that the N1 blocks had thicker wall castings (i.e. smaller water jacket galleries) - perhaps the additional metal is minimal in weight?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/88010-nismo-n1-block/#findComment-1589048
Share on other sites

He has sourced things for the USA like 1990 300Z complete front ends made new buy Nissan and for me he has some 1987 Century badges coming and Toyota Japan are doing some new ones for us which delayed the bits by 3 weeks.

If Graham cant get the bit nobody can.

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/88010-nismo-n1-block/#findComment-1591121
Share on other sites

maybe on the new block if its drag race only grout fill it. On the a brand new rb30 we are building we are grout filling the block as well as running chomoly cylinder liners and a custom sump girdle, that lines the inside of the block and join the thin parts of the block to the girdle.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/88010-nismo-n1-block/#findComment-1592619
Share on other sites

usally i make around 650hp without the NOS and this time when we where tuning it we played around with cam timing and found more power so it was going for 700 with out the NOS so maybe the nismo blocks arent as strong as everyone thinks they are. im only runing 87mm pistons so there not to big, i might have to look into cyl liners or the gt block which they claim its thicker again but double the price.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/88010-nismo-n1-block/#findComment-1595909
Share on other sites

usally i make around 650hp without the NOS and this time when we where tuning it we played around with cam timing and found more power so it was going for 700 with out the NOS so maybe the nismo blocks arent as strong as everyone thinks they are. im only runing 87mm pistons so there not to big,  i might have to look into cyl liners or the gt block which they claim its thicker again but double the price.

Just a question - the new N1 (or standard for that matter) blocks have an 86mm bore. Presumably retaining this bore size would improve strength?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/88010-nismo-n1-block/#findComment-1597651
Share on other sites

a few things to clarify

NISMO DO NOT MAKE an N1 Block

NISSAN make the N1 block. It has a higher Nickel content than the Standard RB26 Block and is stronger.

NISMO just realeased their GT Block this year to co-incide(spelling??) with the release of the R34 GTR Z tune. It is the same block used in the GT500 Race Cars.

Gav, increasing the bore size helps you increase the displacement in the engine. Hence why the HKS 2.8L Kit uses 87mm Pistons.

Retaining the original bore size or only going to 86.5mm pistons aids in developing fantastic engine response (not something that is overly focused on in drag setups). Also going to an 87mm bore rasies concerns about the overall strength of the block. It's fine if you run a drag car that gets re-built often but for a street car that need to last, it's an unnecessary risk IMHO.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/88010-nismo-n1-block/#findComment-1604280
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...