Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GTS-t VSPEC

    20904

  • Nizmo

    13582

  • SHUTO-BOY

    6636

  • skyzerr33

    5353

Originally posted by Micko

Ken - is there much to be gained by having the manifolds ported whilst they are off the car? There is quite a bit of overlap on the outlet, but I'm not sure if it is designed that way to vector the gasses towards to wheel at more of an angle.

Vector the gases ??

wow , you been reading a dick and mary ?

I would suggest that smooth is the way to go with no obstruction. Turbo boost just pushes it out and you want it down the pipe as quick as possible.

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by Micko

Ken - is there much to be gained by having the manifolds ported whilst they are off the car? There is quite a bit of overlap on the outlet, but I'm not sure if it is designed that way to vector the gasses towards to wheel at more of an angle.

this convo sound to intermaletucal for this here chin wag

Originally posted by Micko

Any idea where to get it done then Ken - I got a dremmel tool but I don't think I should touch them unless I know what I'm doing...

Any head type shop can do them.

Lumpy did mine .

Cheers

Ken

bad news there rob

theres a hole in the timing the map will get that looked at. doubt it will add to much to the overall power though.

also need to get the idol sorted just needs alittle more juice to prevent the hunting, i've nearly go tit from playing with the map but not quite.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • "lol dunno" either But like you, I can't see any reason they would need to be different LHD to RHD
    • I agree with you WRT the hard top. MX5's may be one of the better looking soft tops but I cannot think of ANY car, EVER that looks better with a soft top vs a hard top (or a designed roof). At all, ever. I also feel this way about the C5 Vette, the Z06 looks horrible compared to it's original form, it has an exaggerated version of the differences you're talking about.  
    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
×
×
  • Create New...