Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol ..... i still believe a stock R33 will still take out a stock R34 ..... coz i knew ppl who drove a stock R33 who took out a R34 ....  :D !! But i dunno whether is it a manual or auto .....

Was the r34 parked?

i made 200rwkw with my r34@10psi and no ecu or safc.

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

All you boys arguing... STOP IT! You all bought your cars for your own reasons and what you believe is true. Add to this your wallet size and personal taste and VOILA you have a SKYLINE.... yes, believe it or not they are all SKYLINES!

On topic though; if the R34 was not a better car then why would they release the "new" model? Think about it... every aspect of the car would have been improved (brakes, suspension, electronics, engine and yep you guessed it... the aestethics).

However saying that; once you start modding the cars who cares? They all end up doing one thing - GO FAST! :(

ansdwer is easy, 34 man. not only is any power difference going to be so minimal that it isnt worth worying about ( i personally think a 34 would beat a 33 not from preferance but due to fact. and no, i didnt 'hear' it from a mate lol. nissan told me ) but 34's are soo much more pimp than 33's haha they look soo much better and aggressive.

Gezs ... looks like my mates r juz pulling my legs coz i bought a new car!! Shit ... will confront with them this week. but thanks for the advice guys ur realli helpful ... oh by the way do u guys know where to buy front strut bars for R33? do they realli make a difference in driving and conering?

hey wats so bad abt R33s? all u have to do is juz polish once a week and ur car would look as good as new !! and i believe a stock standard R33 would Blow a stock R34!!

well the R33 back looks more sexy than the R34!! form my point of view

Im a big fan of the R33's but the R34 is so much more modern.. Its sharper looking and has that R32 feel about it, I dont know who would win in a drag.. R33 turbo dead stock or R34 turbo dead stock..

Id put my money on the R34 personaly.

Adam 2c

mine wasnt standard  :D

lucky me i did not try to run u or i will look like a dickhead .... but ur ride is really cool especially ur conversion to RB26 .... ;)

i had also call my buddies to tell them abt what i had experienced and they juz laughed those dickheads realli played me out man .... will get them back 1 day .... :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...