Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

all they need to do with that system, is to make it keep a last known GPS location, that would solve the problme justin pointed out....if it takes note of the GPS location b4 it was driven into the garage etc, then you basically pin point the car down to their driveway

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sure does Dezz.

Just my opinion, if anyone could afford a Skyline of any type, they should always get, at the VERY least, 3rd party fire and theft. If you can't afford this, you can't afford to maintain it, thus you can't afford to keep the car.

Sure does Dezz.

Just my opinion, if anyone could afford a Skyline of any type, they should always get, at the VERY least, 3rd party fire and theft.  If you can't afford this, you can't afford to maintain it, thus you can't afford to keep the car.

100% agreed. same for any car. it should be the law to have third party at a very minimum....but if you cant afford to insure your car, you cant afford the car

i stopped myself buying certain cars a while ago for this very reason...

and if the GPS alarm does what i said above, then it should be basically full proof

100% agreed. same for any car. it should be the law to have third party at a very minimum....but if you cant afford to insure your car, you cant afford the car

i stopped myself buying certain cars a while ago for this very reason...

and if the GPS alarm does what i said above, then it should be basically full proof

I think every car does have third part minimum in the rego :P

I think every car does have third part minimum in the rego :P

thought so...but too easy for dead heads to drive around un-registered

and if thats the case, why are people always whinging about other people driving around un-insured

if someone steals ya car and parks it underground the GPS probs wont be able to pick it up tho :huh:

That seam’s true but I would think most thief’s would either take the car for a joy ride or drive it somewhere to be striped down... That being said I know that if your car has being started or even if you disconnect the battery without dis-arming the system that with in a min you would receive a phone call from quick track confirming your car and they will dispatch a guard or police to intercept the vehicle..

Now I don't know, if the car has being driven to an underground location if they can still track it, but they would need to be very quick about it because they will respond very promptly.

midnight... i was driving on beach road, saw a S2 33, but i was driving into the sun, lots of traffic. It didn't look black, but a dark colour...

was gun metal every available in S2? i didn't think it was...

it could have been a dark blue, i tried looking in the rear view mirror, but nearly had a crash :huh: this was around 4:00pm Tuesday afternoon,

i forgot completely to post this.

It was on Beach rd, not far from Elwood park? um... i just call it beach rd cos it's a long the beach, but i know the road changes names... might be an esplanade. But yeah, opposite that picnic type area in Elwood.

are you thinking the car is in the northern suburbs??

I think every car does have third part minimum in the rego :huh:

The third party on your rego is PUBLIC LIABILITY insurance, it does not cover other ppl's cars or property.

I also beleive that 3rd party insurance should be made law. Do it like Europe, you have to present a current insurance policy when paying rego.

The third party on your rego is PUBLIC LIABILITY insurance, it does not cover other ppl's cars or property.

I also beleive that 3rd party insurance should be made law.  Do it like Europe, you have to present a current insurance policy when paying rego.

werd.

didnt think the insurance on rego covered cars

should be compulsory to have third party property damage !

shit, its a couple of hundred, less on shit boxes

I saw a car matching your description but with stock rims parked on osborne ave clayton/springvale 10pm on monday nite.

I was a passenger so a got a fair look even @ the speed my mad running late mate was travelling @, but i didnt see this thread till today so I didnt stop to check for the bonnet mark ect.

100% certain its a dark blue car..95% sure it was an s2.

Might be worth a look...

Sorry that i cant go and check for certain that the car is still there, but im about a 40 min drive away.

Anyway goodluck * peers out the window at his own cars, i've got 3 in the driveway and had the alarms go off 4 times this past week + my nice neighbour spotted a "skanky bogan" in my driveway last week also in my front yard around 8pm last nite...*heads back out front with his trusty bat. Damn I hate people!! especially those toothless dim witted pricks with poor personal hygiene that the suburbs seem awash with.

The third party on your rego is PUBLIC LIABILITY insurance, it does not cover other ppl's cars or property.

I also beleive that 3rd party insurance should be made law.  Do it like Europe, you have to present a current insurance policy when paying rego.

Correct. Only covers the 3rd party individual.

With the UK you now have to take the insurance certificate and the annual roadworthy equivilant certificate called the MOT to get taxed not just insurance which is even better IMO as it prevents bangers going around that are the real road worthy issues.

Sorry to put this in the stolen thread but at least it is keeping it at the top for you mate.

sent you a pm mate...hasnt appeared in my sent items though so i'll post instead/aswell

The car i saw was on the springvale side of osborne ave...so thats a right turn off westall rd if your city bound, the car was parked in the street on the l/h/s.

I noticed it coz im a liner owner and it's my job to notice other lines :P

The color stood out to me because I thought it was another black car like mine till we were right on it I didnt realize it was a dark blue and i've only ever seen 2 in that color. The stock rims on a neat car also made me cringe just a lil bit also.

Anyway if im bored shitless tonite I'll take that drive for you and see if I can spot it...If I do i'll take your mobile # with me. If your going for a look tonite pm me maybe we can meet up and search the area properly.

Goodluck...

Bung

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...