Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just got some more bits for my turbo upgrade and was wondering what power will this baby make ? details are

RB30DET with cast pistons and vvt

Nismo 740cc injectors

Power FC

Sard FPR

HKS Exaust

AVO Stage 2 intercooler

XTR GT3540 .82 ???HP BB turbocharger with Tial 38mm ex gate

Cheapie SS top mount exaust manifold

Stock inlet manifold

Walbro 550hp intank pump

Can you run a bleed valve on a Tial wastegate???

anyway what kinda power is this good for ? the old turbo setup made 230 rwkw on 10psi with standard injectors maxed out

Pictures - SAU Gallery

Edited by Guilt-Toy

yeah, you will need a bigger pump, i maxed out the crappy walbro @ 260-270rwkw and there was nothing left in it.

AFR's were on the border of going south. Piece of junk IMO.

You'll be able to run it with the stock AFM, it'll be maxed for ages, but you can keep going even if its maxed, its just not very safe.

I would advise against it.

What pistons you using?

And a bleeder will be fine, i ran a bleeder of my gate the whole time.

Depending on what PSI you want to run, get the closest gate spring you can to your target PSI, it'll make the whole setup a lot nicer

stocker pistons?

change the turbo to something smaller then, better response dude!

550hp or something, itll come on stupidly early and make the car a much faster streeter

GT35 is a tad large for a stocker motor like that.

My 20 cents worth..........

The secrets to getting a standard internals RB30DET to survive are;

A. no more than 475 bhp (290 rwkw)

B. no more than 1.1 bar of boost

C. no more than 7,000 rpm

D. avoid detonation (nothing more than 10 on the PFC scale)

E. tuning, tuning, tuning

1. You are running a 700 bhp turbo on an engine that won't handle more than 475 bhp (~290 rwkw) for very long. In order to keep the engine alive for any length of time you are going to be using less than half of its airflow capablity. At the same time you are puting up with 700 bhp worth of lag

2. You are running a turbo that doesn't get efficient until it is making 1.3 bar on an engine that won't handle more than 1.1 bar for very long. In order to keep the engine alive for any length of time you are going to be using it at very low efficiencies. At the same time you are puting up with a large turbo (airflow capable) worth of lag

3. You are running a turbo that doesn't generate efficient airflow until 6,000 rpm on engine that shouldn't be rev'd over 7,000 rpm very often. That's a 1,000 rpm powr band, that means on the 1st to 2nd gear change you will have to wait for 2,000 rpm before it gets into stride again.

4. If your mate told you he was geting 2.2 bar (that's full boost on a GT3540) at 3,500 rpm on a 1J he was eitther lying or dreaming.

5. You will need an AFM upgrade, the RB25AFM will get to 5.1 volts around 225 rwkw, with careful tuning you could stretch to 245 rwkw. But 290 rwkw is way beyond stretch and isn't safe. The airflow characteristics of the GT3540 will change after the RB25AFM reaches 5.1 volts. It's time for a Z32 AFM upgrade.

6. Are you running the pump on 12 volts or 13.8 volts? ie; do you have a relay and dedicated wiring back to the battery for the fuel pump or are you still using the standard wiring. If you are getting 13.8 volts at the fuel pump it will be OK for 300 rwkw at 1 bar boost. If you run more boost than that than the fuewl pump flow rate slows down quite dramatically.

:O cheers :)

thats interesting you say that as ive been told that i should go a bigger turbo again because this one is too small for my car - they said i should go the 1.06 rear housing instead of the .82 rear that i have.

Will look into this. What rpm will boost come on with this turbo with a 3 litre with .82 housing then ?

Sorry my mistake -- the turbo would be a 700hp unit with the 1.06 rear ? but this one has the .82 which takes it down to 550 600hp ?

My mate with the 1j that sold me this turbo said he definatly would get close to 2 bar on this turbo by 4000rpm no worries with the .82 rear. does that sound right ?

I got a dyno vid of his 1j doing 406rwkw on 28psi with this turbo with a stokers bottom end

Also the pump is wired using the standard wiring. Have not changed it at all. Doesnt the pump get more voltage when you get onto the gas anyway ? or do you have to directly wire it to a relay and power it directly to the battery?

Sorry my mistake -- the turbo would be a 700hp unit with the 1.06 rear ? but this one has the .82 which takes it down to 550 600hp ?

My mate with the 1j that sold me this turbo said he definatly would get close to 2 bar on this turbo by 4000rpm no worries with the .82 rear.  does that sound right ?

I got a dyno vid of his 1j doing 406rwkw on 28psi with this turbo with a stokers bottom end

dont listen to your mate :)

RB30det, 1jz - two different motors in terms of what they will/wont do etc

Why live with 3500rpm when you could have it 3000rpm or even less with a 500-550hp snail?

Because the next stage for mods would be Forgies / Cams / Rods and much more boost.

This turbo has the .82 housing so its not the 700hp version of the GT3540 right ? wouldnt the 1.06 be the 700hp version ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...