Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

GT-R anyday (provided they're of the same age).

I currently have a GTS-t and have the option of throwing $10K worth of mods at it but I'm saving for a GT-R. Why? It's like asking someone if they want a BMW 330ci or the M3, a Commodore S or a HSV...

What sounds better to this question: what do you drive? I drive a GTS-t with $10K worth of mods... OR I drive a GT-R :D

The only plus to the GTS-t is that mine has a sunroof! :cheers:

I used to be of the opinion that the gtst was an equal with the additional dollars spent on mods. I now am aquiring an R32 GTR.

If you want the tractible power of the gtr's RB26dett you need to buy an RB26dett for your gtst, there goes a good $6000 you have $4k left for mods. You need the RB25/26 gearbox cause the RB20 one is going to die, theres another $2k. You need to replace the gtst brakes with gtr spec ones $1000 , You need the GTR intercooler and piping $1000.

This assumes you did all the work yourself and didn't pay anyone.

You've just spent your $10k. You don't have 4wd, you have crappy rims (the factory gtr rims are very light and accomodate larger amounts of rubber) & the car looks pretty ordinary by comparison (interior and exterior are better on the gtr).

Drive an R32GTR in good nick and I think the argument is settled pretty quick.

I don't think that its a matter of if a GTSt is gonna be as good as a GTR. At the end of the day a GTSt is a GTSt and a GTR is a GTR, nuff sed. I'd own a GTR anyday given the opportunity (which I did, but I passed up because I'd rahter a V Spec 2, and I'd rather get it when I wasn't so concerned about saving up for a house or apartment.)

The question here is whether:

a) can you afford to have a GTR (maintenance, insurance, etc NOT initial cost)

and

B) are you ready to handle the power of a GTR

to answer the questions funkymonkey;

a) The highly modifed gtst if insured legally will cost more than the GTR, considering you have spent the same amount of money and insure it for what it cost you. Maintenance is slightly more on the GTR vs a stock gtst, however with the extra power comes extra wear and breakage so I'd say both are on the sharp end of high maintenance.

B) Inexperienced drivers don't belong in either car. Once you decide to get driver training the argument is in favor of the gtr thanks to 4wd in slippery road conditions.

true... i guess i figgered the logical thing to do is get a stock GTSt, modify it, and get used to the increasing power as you modify it.

But canada like us has a 15 yr rule. Picking up a highly modified GTSt will still cost less than a stock GTR in japan.

Driver training doesn't turn people into peter brock once they have finished. I jumped into the deep end, from a V6 VS ute to a GTST, and I haven't had any trouble.

Sumo

That's not exactly jumping in the deep end mate... Both are similar powered RWD cars...

Mmmm Mmmm, Nothing like a freshly whipped turd in the morning... :rofl:

:( :( :)

Well that's from my experience anyway. When I bought my first R33 GTS-t, I was on my way down south and this guy in a V6 ute pulls up and wants to drag... Being young and immature, as well as wanting to rack up my first kill :rofl:, I revved back at him and at the green we both dropped the hammer and went for it. I got a good launch, just a little bit of wheelspin, and over 200m or so, I probably pulled about 1-1.5 car lengths on him before I shut it down.

My car was dead stock, with 225 tyres, a full tank of gas and a passenger.

His had at least an exhaust and who knows what else...

But the race was a lot closer than I imagined it would be.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...