Jump to content
SAU Community

Time to ditch RAC, which insurer (I'm not a pimpley faced kid)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

60% mate.

$600 is very good, what is the insured value. Mine was $25k for $1000 but, its a 'work use' thingo.

If they come at insuring imports you should see if they give you a bonus for signing up new business.

Im with western QBE also, 2 years NCB, costs me $1300 a year. Ive been told mine will drop to $950 this year too (26 tomorrow!)

QBE wont insure imports at all if its new business though, they require you to have an exsisting policy, because theyre s.hit scared you'll go elsewhere. So transfer your home and contents over to them as well.

I also qualify for 10 percent discount, being a season ticket holder at Perth Oval. Handy when your insurance bill is over a grand a year.

Red17

rev,

Mines insured for $26K. It's getting harder and harder for new people to insure the cars, even if your old. I haven't bothered looking around much, I've got a good price, just have to make sure I never have an accident.

See'ya :burnout:

I had my Pulsar insure with them so i phoned them up, asked about their policy on imports.... quoted and accepted the insurance on my R32 for $1300.

Put the phone down

Called back 2 minutes later: "Hi id like to cancel my policy on my Nissan pulsar" "Sure no worries"

Its worth going with them, ive spoken to panel beaters numerous times about which company is best to deal with and QBE comes out on top all the time. SGIO apparently have the biggest rep for not paying up on customers.

Red17

gts-t vspec, are you over 25?

i've had an NA car insured with wetern qbe for about 5 years (60%). i tried to get my mr2 insured and they said i had to be over 25 if i wanted insurance for the super charger.

did i speak to the wrong guy? i was half tempted to say it was NA but decided against it.

cheers

aw11,

I am currently 25, but my insurance was still less than $800 even when I was under 25. It really does depend who you speak to, if you get a sympathetic person they can do all sorts of deals. The guy I spoke to loved Skylines, so I get a good deal.

See'ya:burnout:

I will never understand the huge difference in prices, some people at 33 are paying more than I was at 23, doesn't make any sense. The insurance is what is killing the import business, young peope are paying over $3000 a year to get a car, it's just ridiculous.

See'ya:burnout:

yep, i'm 25 with HBF for $1080 on 40% no claims, insured for $25K. they were the cheapest i found after calling close to 20 companies in Perth and over east. next best i think was Famous with a quote around $1600, a guy i work with recently insured (i think!) an R34 with them too. about time some of the "mainsteam" companies got back into imports

Beeble, that is a pretty good price, hopefully with revs 60% NCB, then his would be even cheaper.

I tend to do all of my insurance through the one company as they give you discount on all your insurance if you have house, contents and car with them.

See'ya:burnout:

Originally posted by rev210

I'm giving the RAC the arse.  

I pay around $1,000 a year for my 1995 gtst, a good price but, if I can get close somewhere else I'm going!

Who is the kick arse insurer to sign with?

If you have a clean record and 60% NCB, try Torque .. I'm paying $831 p/a for $24,000.

Hrmm. Well i'm 20 and finding it very difficult to find insurance. You guys have a bit better chance then what I do.

I've been with RAC for 3 years with however many % NCB that is and only. Soon as I mension Import or Skyline, i'm rejected.

However, I have an insurance guy running around looking at insurance for me. The best he came up with, was $3300 and recommended I go for it, even if I have to take a loan. I though, nah F**K that! I think he just wants whatever commission he gets!

I know you guys have talked about this previously in your other posts, but I think i've been through nearly every insurer.

Anyone got any last suggestions, even for 3RD PARTY!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...