Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guy's,

I'm about to undertake an Rb25/30 conversion on my Turbo. I have bought the head(Rb25det(R33)) and rebuilding my RB 30 Turbo Bottom End.

My questions !!!!!!

1. Who on here have done the conversion.

2. How many kilometres since the conversion or until you sold it

3. Have you had any problems

I spoke to a member of a performance shop at Morningside(not naming names) and they told me I will have nothing but problems and it's a waste of money.

Anyone wanna way in on the subject is welcome.

My plan is(No short cuts) ;

Full rebuild with the block full prepped, re bored 20thou oversized.

New Wiseco Forged RB25 Pistons, New RB30 Parr Rods balanced and shotpeened. All new gaskets etc etc. Garrett 35/40 Turbo, Custom high mount manifold and custom computer(Prob Microtech).

My mechanic said he had no problems with his conversion but only had it for three months before selling it. He has made me keen as, but after speaking to the guy from the shop I'm starting to have second thoughts.........cus I could buy a RB25 or Rb26 complete with some bolt ons for the same money...

Any assistance would be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/92037-reliability-issues/
Share on other sites

I built an RB30/RB25DE hybrid over 5 years ago using all standard components, no aftermarket parts at all. It made 475 bhp on the engine dyno, it has done over 70,000 k's without one single problem using the standard ECU chipped. The secret is tuning, knowing the limits and sticking to them. Most problems come from poor tuning and wanting "just a little bit more".

You are going a few steps above that, but the same rules apply. Short comments on parts selction;

Wiseco pistons are OK, why are you going 20/100 over? If the block doesn't need it?

Never used Parr rods so can't comment, forged rods don't need aftermarket shotpeening, the shot just bounces off and does nothing.

Head gasket is important, do some research

Garret 35/40 is an OK choice as long as it meets your power and response targets. What are they?

Custom high mount exhaust manifold, some are good, some are crap, make sure you get a good one.

Personally I would NEVER use a Mictrotech on an RB, they are not suited. We use Microtechs on the RX7's, I wouldn't use anything else. But not on an RB, you will have all sorts of issues that will cost you time and money fixing. I would do some more research.

Hope that helps

;) cheers :)

PS, we have since built over 20 X RB30DET's, one is up to 950 bhp.

Yep,

Trying to get it done right. Parr Rods are being used by Hardcore Racing up here in Brisbane and have cars running 700rwhp without problems.

Looking for btw 300 - 450rwkw.

As far as manifold I will try to get something reputable and proven.

I hear so much about different computers. My mechanic said Haltech but the same guy from Morningside said they are crap and it will cost a fortune to dyno tune. Hardcore and them recommended Microtech. I was thinking the stock ecu with a chip but I'm still wondering what to do.

My mechanic said a 30/40 would be good responsive wise generally but he recommended a 35/40. He said it will lag a little(35/40) but in the event I want to boost it and get that bit more, I dont have to upgrade the turbo.

Good to hear the numbers you have built and the numbers they have been punching out.

By the way the car will be my drive car everyday so thats why I really need the reliability.

Cheers Imtorqing

The new microtech plug in is worth looking at.

They now have closed loop. Very attractive indeed.

If your looking for 300 to say 330rwkw then stick with prepped std rods providing the car is a streeter, if its anything more than a streeter I would not look past a set of decent rods. Run good bearings and u will be fine.

Edited by Cubes

Your motor is only as good as it's tune... The Gt35r turbo is the go with the .82 exhaust. I'd go with the power fc, they're designed for the rb and have been proven to better then most computers, and are on hundreds of cars on this forum.

ive got an rb25/30 combo

blueprinted/balanced, shot peened rods, aria's hpc coated pistons, just to name a few mods, got a whole list of them on the site

td07s turbo with to4r comp wheel and back cut t66 rear with 360 degree thrust bearing

autosalon dyno made 352rwkw@16psi

ben...

one last coment consider buildign an rb26 for the kind of power you are looking for 400-450 rwkw the development is there .

on last thing at that hosre power dont expect much more that 10 or 20,000 klms . and more than likely sub 10 000 klms. 300 rwkw will see a much longer servicable life with a good shot of nos when your on the track.

next before you build any thing I woud suggest going for a ride in a car with 350 rwkw + and make sure its what you want b4 spending all your money.

cheers

meggala

Exactly as Meggala states. :D

Our recent dyno day had a few cars up around the 300rwkw mark.

Their complaint was.. traction. One said, its quite dissapointing on the street, no traction until 4th gear. The car was setup with rather hard suspension and no pinneapples, and.. it was a rb30/25, torque kills traction. :rolleyes:

I thought the linear nature of the rb30 would help traction. I was wrong. :P

I spoke to a member of a performance shop at Morningside(not naming names) and they told me I will have nothing but problems and it's a waste of money.

I wouldnt be going there ever again for the simple fact of...

They obviously no idea about anything. Amatuers.

SK has hit it on the head with a lot of what he has said... but for a 300-450rwkw.. thats a massive span mate.

You need to be more specific. is it 300 or 450?

300 will be doable with a GT30, .82 or 1.06 and will be very responsive

350 will be a GT35 no worries with pretty decent response also

400 you can get from a GT35, you might have to fuel it up on something other than pulp though with bigger boost and more ignition gear over stock

Your also going to need some headwork in there for much over the 300 region, including cams, porting and all that jazz to get the flow going

As NIB said also, go with an ECU that your tuner knows.

You'll get the best results that way as opposed to giving them something they are unfimiliar with

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...