Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest Pearman

Hi,

I have been told that during winter months, salt is used to breakdown ice on japan’s roads. I’m also told that this leads to higher levels of rust in jap cars.

Questions,

What do you guys think? Found much rust in your cars?

If so, where are the problem areas / common places to checkout?

I also here that AM body kits are sometimes used to hide rust, etc

Any comments…

Thanks

Pearman

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9324-rust/
Share on other sites

It doesnt snow that much in Japan. The mainland and the south in particular (where the most people live) is more prone to temperate/sub tropical climate which has typhoons and torrential rain in winter, humid wet summers.

Sapporo however is usually covered in snow during winter, but thats about 1.7 million people out of 126 million. Not that many cars really :P

I dare say the problem exsists, but its probably fairly uncommon. If your worried, id check things like chassis rails and subframe parts.

Red17

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9324-rust/#findComment-140159
Share on other sites

Yeah just have a good look under the the car... ie subframe etc...

I checked out mine before i bought it and was really impressed with the condition of the car in terms of rust, mainly because i found absolutely none... japan would be alot less harsh in terms of rust than us here on the east coast of australia i think?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9324-rust/#findComment-140171
Share on other sites

Originally posted by red17

It doesnt snow that much in Japan. The mainland and the south in particular (where the most people live) is more prone to temperate/sub tropical climate which has typhoons and torrential rain in winter, humid wet summers.  

Sapporo however is usually covered in snow during winter, but thats about 1.7 million people out of 126 million. Not that many cars really :)

It sounds like you know alot about Japan, but I'm confused. Have you ever been to Japan?

I just came back from two weeks in Japan where I was based in Tokyo and backpacked around north and south of the main island. I caught the Shinkansen to Hiroshima, Kyoto and Nagano.

It was snowing all the way to Hiroshima (Kyoto is on the way), it snowed in Nagano (obviously), and even snowed in Tokyo the day after I left.

From my brief experience and most importantly talking to people who live there and/or have family there, it seems that Japan sees a LOT of snow in their winter.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9324-rust/#findComment-140201
Share on other sites

Originally posted by red17

Ok maybe im wrong then, damn university education lets me down again. These authors of text books should really stop publishing lies  

Red17

BA (Geography)

hehe...

Makes sense, my degree was full of outdated procedures and programming languages... Silly University :)

In any case, as I said, I was only there for two weeks, so I'm hardly an authority on Japan, but the impression that I got was that they get their fair share of the white stuff ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9324-rust/#findComment-140227
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...