Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

and as ive heard from people comparing garrett with hks turbos, is the hks ones will keep on pumping more hp at high boost, where as the garrett stuff runs outta puff at high boost levels and flattens off.

indeed, and there was a massive thread on it about 1.5 years ago.

But from what ive seen the Garretts arent a lot different to thier HKS counterparts. They are both well engineered products

I found the HKS TO4Z Product Information blurb at  http://www.roggan.net/TO4Z.pdf  . Some interesting pics and graphs but sadly no compressor map .

Cheers Adrian .

Keep in mind thats the HKS T04Z NOT the Garret T04Z...

:D

Yes true , but the cartridge (wheels) seem to be the same . The thing to look into is what Garrett offer in the way of exhaust housings , the HKS version is not like normal twin entry turbine housings - the divider does not go all the way around the inside of the volute or internal passage . If you look at the pics of the HKS housing the outside of the volute is quite narrow for the flanges dimensions and inlet holes . To get the housing to flow the gas the nozzle section must be wide meaning greater turbine tip height . I'd say this must be why they chose to use the larger TO4 sized flange rather than a more compact T3 twin entry type .

Provided Garretts twin entry housings are similar style they should do similar things for the same ARR . Notice the difference in the compressor covers , big difference in size given that the same ARR is used for a wheel of the same basic dimensions . The port shroud design looks pretty and would not be hard for a machinist to copy .

Still need to see the cartridge itself and the housings (esp exhaust) from the inside .

Cheers from Parkes , A .

Yes true , but the cartridge (wheels) seem to be the same . The thing to look into is what Garrett offer in the way of exhaust housings , the HKS version is not like normal twin entry turbine housings - the divider does not go all the way around the inside of the volute or internal passage . If you look at the pics of the HKS housing the outside of the volute is quite narrow for the flanges dimensions and inlet holes . To get the housing to flow the gas the nozzle section must be wide meaning greater turbine tip height . I'd say this must be why they chose to use the larger TO4 sized flange rather than a more compact T3 twin entry type . 

Provided Garretts twin entry housings are similar style they should do similar things for the same ARR . Notice the difference in the compressor covers , big difference in size given that the same ARR is used for a wheel of the same basic dimensions . The port shroud design looks pretty and would not be hard for a machinist to copy .

Still need to see the cartridge itself and the housings (esp exhaust) from the inside .

Cheers from Parkes , A .

Finally got pics of the wheels . Compressor looks a little like a big trim GT wheel though the splitter blades sit a bit lower . The turbine looks a lot like a TO4 P trim .

Cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...