Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hahahaha might have to... apparently the gold one makes a bbit of a whistle, bought a cheap trust type s copy today

put it on and sounds like my ssq nothing like the type s. maybe the spring it to tight or not tight enough, its not one solid woshhhhhhh, i dono will play around tomoro, or maybe its cos its a cheapy and its just crap hahhaha

Hi, I had the standard silver insert and bought a purple one from Xspeed. They used to have all of the SSQV accessories, so check out their website. My understanding was that the gold insert made no difference in sound, it was just a different colour. The purple insert is a lower pitch sound, which is less penetrating (i.e. carries less).

I recently bought a plumb back connection for the SSQV from bd4s.com.au. So now I don't go "PHUTOOOO", I go more like "phoooo".:)

Hope this helps.

Cheers.

P.S. Aren't phonic representations of BOV sounds crazy! If you had a conversation about it in public, you would be locked up! :D

hey guys i'm planning to get a HKS SSQV BOV and everything on my car is stock just changed the airfliter only, my friends told me the car will stall alot is it true?? do i really need to get a better ECU for it to work??

ps. its a R33 Serious II

a atmo. bov on a stock car can cause it to stall a bit, as the ecu thinks the air is going back into the intake, and sends in enough fuel to compensate for it, except the air isnt going into the intake, but rather out into the atmosphere. so it has less air, and over fueledl, and can stall.

R33 Serious II eh? ive got a R33 Series I :)

I've got a serious 1. :P

Apparently the stall issue is also how u tune the blow off (from what i heard, how true it is, i don't know), the pressure spring tightness. But by right, it shouldn't. Most.. or almost all cars after installing it dosn't have any probs. But of course, murphy's theory stands.

hey guys i'm planning to get a HKS SSQV BOV and everything on my car is stock just changed the airfliter only, my friends told me the car will stall alot is it true?? do i really need to get a better ECU for it to work??

ps. its a R33 Serious II

Hi again. An atmo BOV should not make any significant difference to the likelihood of your car to stall. Mitchy's comment is true to a point, the engine will run momentarily rich for a second or so when the BOV has acted. But this won't cause it to stall - 'coz your BOV is only acting at 1800-ish revs and above.

There is a looong thread on low revs stalling, in the Forced Induction forum, which concluded that repeated stalling at low revs comes from the Oxygen sensor being stuffed. There is loads of info on replacing it, including getting the same part from a Ford dealer, but loads cheaper.

So you can just stick your BOV on the car and it should work fine.

Cheers. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...