Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

At this stage no!

Dart and CRD have been the two workshops behind the complete build and tune and the results speak for themselves.

At the end of the day I had the motor build to withstand significantly more power than im actually chasing, to leave me a buffer should I choose to go after more HP at a later stage.

So far for the street the GT-SS's have proved to be a great turbo choice so I really cant complain

Nick,

As you know all the hardware on my car was done by DART & tuned by CRD!

Its great to see these gtr guru's truly shine :rolleyes:

Congratulations mate - we shall catch up soon! (after my final tune)

Marko.

At this stage no!

Dart and CRD have been the two workshops behind the complete build and tune and the results speak for themselves.

At the end of the day I had the motr build to withstand significantly more power than im actually chasing, to leave me a buffer should I choose to go after more HP at a later stage.

So far for the street the GT-SS's have proved to be a great turbo choice so I really cant complain

blk180,

im keen to see the results myself - fingers crossed it is now run in after covering 4500km...

it is currently tuned at 325awkw, i have been waiting for that extra 'ooomf' for quite some time now!

363awkw on bp ultimate so should be interesting...

Marko.

Marko R1 cant wait to see what those GTRS turbos can really do sould be good

tommy k,

it is booked for next week so it will be ready friday.

do u have a similar setup? If im mistaken i thought that u were running gtss turbos

Marko

Marko

when will it be ready.

Gimme a date please :P

tommy k,

it is booked for next week so it will be ready friday.

do u have a similar setup? If im mistaken i thought that u were running gtss turbos

Marko

Marko,

Im running the garrett '2530s'. Im also waiting for a retune. Car pulled 315rwkw on a dynolog with coil pack failure. Since then, adding a new fuel pump and coils, the car feels quicker than the 315rwkw run. Adding more timing (4 degrees more) and more fuel the car feels a load MORE quicker even, without any knock issues. So im very keen to see how we go also.

But look very forward to see your results.

400awkw shouldnt be too far away.

I hear Nick just bought a T51R SPL :P LOL

tommy k has 2560s would be nice if we could get Morgs graph and yours from CRD. morgs was running a T04Z

I have that, and the difference in spoolup is quite dramatic. The difference does lie in the top end though, T04z > 2x2560

I have the sheets on my pc at home. Will endeavour to post em up. Bear in mind, Morgs made more power in a different run, so the only real relevance would be the spoolup and torque curves ?

EDIT - I have Morgs' run from Bel on the same sheet as my best run, not the CRD one. But at least this way its a more accurate comparison

:P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
×
×
  • Create New...