Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have read and there seems to be a belief that 12:1 is the A/F ratio that you should use when tunning an RB engine, My problem is My car was tuned using 12.9 and it runs as rich as and is fowling plugs I had it tuned again with 13:1 mixtures it is slightly better but my plugs are still black and sooty. I must admit I dont drive the car on long trips or hard, only short ones which may be causing the problem. Would I be better to change plugs to hotter plugs because of my driving conditions/style or just have it tuned close to stoich 14.7? I am runnig an SAFC. Or can it be somthing else causing the plug fowling?

Edited by R31Heaven
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94118-the-magic-121-af-ratio/
Share on other sites

I have read and there seems to be a belief that 12:1 is the A/F ratio that you should use when tunning an RB engine, My problem is My car was tuned using 12.9 and it runs as rich as and is fowling plugs I had it tuned again with 13:1 mixtures it is slightly better but my plugs are still black and sooty. I must admit I dont drive the car on long trips or hard, only short ones which may be causing the problem. Would I be better to change plugs to hotter plugs because of my driving conditions/style or just have it tuned close to stoich 14.7? I am runnig an SAFC. Or can it be somthing else causing the plug fowling?

Unleaded fuel always burns black and sooty, that is the way it is. You can only get a nice light grey exhaust pipe colour with leaded fuel or avgas. Unleaded cars always have dark black exhaust pipes, even when running lean.

Spark plug heat range has a lot to do with it too. Too cold a plug may foul, even in a well tuned engine that does not burn any oil.

12:1 air fuel range adds just enough fuel to burn all the available oxygen and will give maximum power. Any more fuel than that cannot burn because there is not enough air in there to do the job, so power will not increase below 12:1

14:1 air fuel ratio ensures that all the fuel is burnt completely, no unburned fuel will be present in the exhaust. Leaning it off beyond 14:1 will not improve economy.

I have read and there seems to be a belief that 12:1 is the A/F ratio that you should use when tunning an RB engine, My problem is My car was tuned using 12.9 and it runs as rich as and is fowling plugs I had it tuned again with 13:1 mixtures it is slightly better but my plugs are still black and sooty. I must admit I dont drive the car on long trips or hard, only short ones which may be causing the problem. Would I be better to change plugs to hotter plugs because of my driving conditions/style or just have it tuned close to stoich 14.7? I am runnig an SAFC. Or can it be somthing else causing the plug fowling?

Few suggestions;

1. If it isn't warming up then it is always on cold run enrichment. So either you don't drive far enough for it to warm up or the water temp sensor is not working. I would check that.

2. Low speed, constant throttle and idle is at stoick because it runs in closed loop.

Have you ever replaced the lambda sensor? Or checked that is is in fact running closed loop A/F ratios when it should be?

3. 12.9 to 1 is not a very safe A/F ratio, neither of the above 2 problems are fixed by further leaning out. But you are already in dangerous territory.

4. Are you sure about the accuracy of the A/F ratio meter you are using? Standard is 10.5 to one and I have never heard of a standard Skyline fouling plugs.

5. Since you have not reported any missing under load, I don't believe coil packs are an issue.

6. What heat range plugs are you running? The NGK "7" heat range should be fine.

Hope that was of some help

:) cheers :)

So War speed what you are saying is 12:1 is for max power or performance and 14:1 is for optimal economy?

Sydneykid, I have a new O2 sensor and temp sensor so have ruled that out I am runinig NGK BCP 6ES-11 plugs. so may go to a 5 I have a SAFC and get no knocking readings on 13:1 even under load. I am running a RB25 Turbo on an RB20 NICS motor with only 5 psi boost (stock) and a 600 x 300 x 80 FMIC.

With the acuracy the setting were with a probe in the exhaust while on a dyno? Even the Dyno guy wanted to set my tunnig to 14:1, so this has realy got me thinking.

What sort of ecu are you running? Does it still have closed loop mixture control?

I suspect your tuner isn't correctly setting up your low load mixtures and that is why you are fouling plugs. You should be aiming for 14.7:1 for cruise and up to about 11.5-12 (depending on boost and timing run) under load.

If he is seriously talking about running 14:1 under load then cut and run as fast as you can and get yourself another tuner before you pop an engine.

Seconds on the finding another tuner.

My understanding is that leaner mixtures burn hotter - as in hot enough to burn a piston, or through the head.

Under cruise load, the extra heat is not an issue, but when you start making (using?) a decent amount of power, bad things happen. Which is why :

You should be aiming for 14.7:1 for cruise and up to about 11.5-12 (depending on boost and timing run) under load.

there needs to a be a little room for error

Driving style notwithstanding, lean mixtures at full throttle.... bad.

hope it helps (and hope its right)

From what I've read, 12.6 is max power and 14.7 is stoich for unleaded.

Running at 12:1 whould be using fuel to cool the intake charge wouldn't it?

I lost 3rwkw between 6500 and 7000 by dropping my af ratio from 12.5 to 11.9.

I'm happy with that little bit of extra buffer.

mine now sits on a 12:1 ratio ...pickd up nearly 100km's to a tank at the same time........ my car was stupidly rich before.... AFR's would bottom out on the graph under 10:1 under WOT. Previously i had issues with fouling plugs......must be a redtop ecu thing.... coz they are just too rich.

12:1 is were u should be at John.. leaning it out is probably going to ask for pinging. had mine "quick tuned" at ICE on the dyno day within the space of 3 runs it pickd up 30rwkw mid range... .. was basically just to bring the AFRs up till i take it back with this bigger turbo now on it.

14:1 air fuel ratio ensures that all the fuel is burnt completely, no unburned fuel will be present in the exhaust. Leaning it off beyond 14:1 will not improve economy.

[/quote

Leaning it off will improve economy - this is why older cars as in pre 2002 run lean cruise mixtures. The problem with a leaning AFR is that you introduce more NOx which mixes with photochemical smog to produce O3 which depleates the ozone. Damn hippies f*#%ing our fuel economy.

AFR up to about 17:1 can be seen under lean cruise. However nissan ECU's do not use the lean cruise function probably because of the reason above.

Which makes me wonder....

Solder a resistor inline with the o2 sensor to achieve a leaner cruise and idle... providing it likes to idle at those leaner mixtures.

meh ozone smozone... We are heading in to an ice age anyway. :)

Edited by Cubes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • HyperGear. Just get a high flow of the stocker. Good, reliable, and should bolt on. Yes it will want things like a retune once done, so you need to factor this in to your spend too.
    • Hi. Iam looking for some "cheaper" bolt on turbo on RB25DET NEO. I do not want "big" power just better reliability than the stock turbo which is "fot now" good but is old and i do not think it has "easy" life. One the Skyline here running some "temu" china Turbo but i dont trust those... Thanks!  
    • Hi guys, Making some space/cleaning up. A whole heap of random OEM R33 GTR parts and other random bits and bobs. I will update this thread as I go. Parts are located in Moorebank NSW 2170. Pickup preferred but will post at buyers expense. Prices are negotiable. If they don’t sell it will go in the bin. Item 1: BOV return pipe. $40 Item 2: RB26 cam gears. $20 Item 3: R33 GTR torque split, oil temp, boost centre gauge. $100 Item 4: RB26 fuel rail x 2. $20 each Item 5: RB26 Recirc valves. $50 Item 6: OEM upper front arms. $20 Item 7: Royal Purple Max Gear 75w-140 1 quart/946 ml x 5. $50 each or 5 for $200. Item 8: OS Giken 80w-250 diff oil 1 litre. $25 Item 9 Eibach springs. ers-11-140-60-0140. $100 https://www.streetfx.com.au/eib140-60-0060-eibach-ers-140mm-length-x-60mm-id-coil-over-spring?_ga_campaignid=22235933977&_ga_adgroupid=180146800292&_ga_keyword=&_ga_device=m&_ga_target=pla-295238231169&_ga_locint=&_ga_locphy=9071723&_ga_matchtype=&_ga_network=g&_ga_device=m&_ga_placement=&_gcl_id=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22235933977&gbraid=0AAAAADPiTbo1xAuvnjIWWYnezivf-BUSY&gclid=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE    
    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
×
×
  • Create New...