Jump to content
SAU Community

Wanted Info On Front Mount For R33


S1R33
 Share

Recommended Posts

I suppose however, that on a completely stock skyline, the stock intercooler would have an efficency close enough to a FMIC for the purpose of producing the power made at 'stock'. Furthermore any advantages made by lowering the charge density of the air from a FMIC would probably be outweighed by the difference in the 'lag' time taken for the turbocharger to increase the pressure in a larger area.

So in that respect Paul, I would agree with you. I wouldn't see how just adding a FMIC would increase power (unless you had other mods like exhaust, upped boost pressure etc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just picked up my blitz boost controller from autobarn today, f*ken whole manual is japanese, there goes the auotbarn sales talk 'it wll bolt on, just read the manual'. I ordered a Hybrid front mount intercooler kit through them yesterday as well, got if for $890 inc freight to Darwin, not too bad, could have got it cheaper but i get a local replacement warranty etc. MODS are coming slowly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When i installed my front mount, the biggest thing i noticed was the lack of throttle response. Running the same boost i thought that the car was a little slower overall.

Turning up the boost sorta overcame that problem, but throttle response wasnt there. When boost hit though, it felt faster (since i was running more boost), but from my experience with a FMIC, ive come to the conclusion that a fmic is a support part to allow you to get more power.

I still need tuning though so maybe my opinion will change after that.

So pretty much what paulr33 said is spot on.

What youll get is more lag, less throttle response and worse fuel economy, but you get the potential to make more power in the end.

my fmic is a greddy v-spl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Physics hey? Boyles Law, Charles’s Law etc.

P1V1/T1=P2V2/T2

I’ll borrow some numbers from FMIC tests for a RS500 and pick a boost of 15psi.

Turbo air temp was 135deg C. (408 deg absolute)

After the cooler the air temp is 35deg C. (308 deg absolute)

So the turbo pumps 15psi x V1 at 408 deg absolute.

After the cooler we have either 0.75V1 at 15psi or V1 at 11.3psi.

Sure there is air flow resistance in the pipework and heat soak for a sustained load, but the numbers demonstrate you get more denser air.

Most errors happen in wastegate pressure readings.

An Rb20 takes the wastegate pressure straight from the compressor housing so it doesn’t know what is happening in the plenum. It will spool up fractionally faster but now there is a lot more volume to fill so it’s a bit laggy.

Once the initial surge has levelled out, the plenum pressure will be lower than normal, but it will be filled with denser air so the net result is similar power, with a nice anti-detonation safety margin.

The Rb25 takes its wastegate pressure after the cooler, so you’ll get more air in the plenum due to the increase in air density. Again it will spool up slightly faster and it will have some lag, the plenum pressure will read same as before but it will now have a more dense air charge. The turbo has eaten more air and the AFM is out of sync with the parameters set up by Nissan.

Without altering the tune via a PFC etc, the AFM will sense the larger air flows and start to dump in fuel. Stop/start conditions are the worst as it’s continually fuelling for unrealistic air flows, the black-bumper syndrome.

If you add some other factors like a cold evening and no air temp compensation, I’m sure that’s why so many slightly modded Rb25’s experience the R&R which ends in the Ignition/Fuel cut and the poor old coil-packs cop the blame.

Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Both of those things are on my to do but not quite in a position to do that just yet until I can at least get it running back to stock. Going to work on getting the exhaust manifold gasket and studs replaced first, an obvious need it now. Then I'll try out the new maf and see hownthat does. After that I'm thinking cas if I'm still having the same issues. Still need to run the fuel out and refuel I'll change the fuel filter tomorrow along with cleaning the iacv with carb cleaner. If all else fails I'm going to get a serial port and see if I can get some sort of data on what the ecu is seeing when the issue is happening but really hoping one of the methods above work out first. After I get a good base I'm going link but have to save for that so it'll be a while for that based on my tuners suggestions. Definitely need the exhaust leak fixed first though car has always fallen flat after about 4-4500 rpm since I've had it and suspecting that's the issue. Then I can move forward with the rest. 
    • My vote is rebuild s2 engine or maybe get a neo (but expect you may need to rebuild that too). Doing an engine conversion you would have to be a true tragic nowadays and actively be aware there's better/smarter options for value.
    • Or buy one someone built earlier! (realistically V8 mustangs or MKV supras are great). I see people nowadays putting ZF8's into MK4's, and people putting 370z gearboxes, diffs, axles into R and S chassis and it's like.... just get a 370z at that point and mildly boost the 3.7 instead of the 2L and away we go...
    • If you're going to go v8 or really any swap now with all the tax, I'd most likely just get rid of the car and start with something else. Unfortunately, I have a mate with a surplus of ls and Ferrari/Maserati v8's that's always tempting me FFS lol.
    • If you can get a clean, tested neo from Japan for $3500 these days, it's probably worth getting either way, hard not to be skeptical at that price. Otherwise probably rebuild the s2.
×
×
  • Create New...