Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

Looking at a 3" turbo back for a R34.

Would like some help or advice about a good system.

Requirements:

- good power gain

- quiet

- preferably non canon muffler (twin tip muffler / oval muffler with tip would be nice)

I was looking at getting BATMBL's split dump and maybe one of his cats or a magic cat (Whats better?). A jap branded cat back would probably be on the list too. Unfortunately most of them are canon style mufflers.

However I would like the exhaust to be as quiet as possible as I am not a big fan of loud exhausts.

Any ideas or suggestions?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/95768-best-exhaust-system-for-a-r34/
Share on other sites

Hi all

Looking at a 3" turbo back for a R34.

Would like some help or advice about a good system.

Requirements:

- good power gain

- quiet

- preferably non canon muffler (twin tip muffler / oval muffler with tip would be nice)

I was looking at getting BATMBL's split dump and maybe one of his cats or a magic cat (Whats better?). A jap branded cat back would probably be on the list too. Unfortunately most of them are canon style mufflers.

However I would like the exhaust to be as quiet as possible as I am not a big fan of loud exhausts.

Any ideas or suggestions?

I don't think you can go past CES's system. I didn't get one from them and I know my car is very loud (but very unrestricted). Mine is just a 3" split dump pipe system with hiflow cat, hotdog resonator and cannon (with removable silencer makes it much quieter).

The CES system that a few people have bought comes with a 3" split dump pipe system with cat, resonator and a twin tip magnaflow muffler and it is much quieter and doesnt have the annoying drone. And because of the research etc that CES has done, they are pretty good flowing too (not too restrictive and dyno proven).

If you want quiet, the Fujitsubo ones are known to low noise and also don't have a cannon tip.

The Stagea guys seem to like it:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=90146

What cat do you guys recommend?

- 3" Magic Cat with 4" body (rated pretty highly by people here and come with bolt on optionm no idea what the flow rating is) ~ $300

- 3" big body BATMBLS Catco cats? (seem to be the highest flowing 706cfm with bolt on option) ~ $440

- Metal Cat

And when they say bolt on, does that mean the cat will bolt on fine inbetween teh dump pipe and the cat back exhaust?

I found this quote on a website:

"(Catco) 706CFM FLOW RATE with the 3" piping! NOTHING else comes close, since the 3" Metal CAT flows 629CFM and the 3" Magic CAT (with the 4" body and 3" cone reducers welded to it) flows 540CFM. All 3 CATs were independantly tested at the same site on the same machine."

Hmm kinda confused now as different people say different things.

Edited by nuffsaid

What do you guys rekon of a Fujitsubo twin system like the one below:

ex011.jpg

Pipes are smaller, and more bends, but 2 pipes. How would it compare to other single pipe quiet cat back systems?

And is the layout for the R33 cat back systems the same as the R34? I was wondering whether I could buy a cat back for a R33 so it would fit the 34?

Edited by nuffsaid

Yeha kinda interested in the CES magnaflow system too, purely because I can get a twin tip muffler (quite like the look)

Unfortunately, its pretty much the same price. I suppose with the CES system I wont get as much R&D as the Fujitsubo system. I hear fujitsubo make one of the best exhausts out there and well its proven I';d say.

CES have yet to make a system for a 34 I think.

CES have fitted a few R34's with systems (owners here on the forums). All I can say in terms of the difference between a very high flowing loud system and a CES System is volume by a lot on the outside and pretty much no drone on the inside. The performance when considering relatively stock cars is negligble.

I mean if R34GTX's 7 month year old baby can sleep the whole way through a cruise up and down hills, I'd say its quiet.

On that note though, if you are planning serious mods, you may want to consider a more expensive or freer flowing system like the more expensive jap brands OR, get a cheap high flowing system with whatever tips you want and get an Apexi Exhaust Controller Valve (electronic costs a bit more than the lever operated one). That way you can have an easily switchable system. Not 100% on the legality though.

Some R34 GTT or R34 GTX-T's came with an exhaust volume control (only 2 or 3 settings though) from the factory.

I guess the question is for $1200 would you buy a CES system or a Fujitsubo?

See:

http://translate.google.com/translate?u=ht...Flanguage_tools

The only thing I know of at the momment is that I like the CES twin tip, other than that, I think the Fujit wins in terms of performance, build quality etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...