Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There is a bit of talk about this around but for those of you who don't leav the Vic section Shell have release a 100 RON fuel, the first in Aus. Only issue here is they have added 5% Ethanol. I'm not sure what issues if any this can cause for us skyline drivers but I'd be interested to hear what people have to say

Also keen to know price of it compared to say standard unleaded...

Cut from Shells website -

"Shell Optimax Extreme is a new super-high octane fuel with a minimum octane rating of 100, the highest currently available at any Australian service station. Shell Optimax Extreme is formulated with 5% ethanol.

Shell Optimax Extreme is formulated to deliver more engine responsiveness, sharper acceleration and enhanced power in many modern and high performance vehicles compared to other Shell premium fuels.

Ethanol is a renewable non-fossil fuel produced in Australia. When used in fuel it’s a cleaner burning, renewable component that helps to reduce Greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, through the formulation with ethanol, Shell Optimax Extreme has a substantially lower sulphur and benzene content than the maximum levels set under the Federal Government’s fuel quality standards. Ethanol is a cleaner burning, renewable fuel component that helps to reduce Greenhouse gas emissions."

Shell Optimax Extreme will initially be available at selected Coles Express sites in the Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Canberra.

Link - http://www.shell.com/home/Framework?siteId...ut_extreme.html

Link regarding compatibility for "local" cars - http://www.fcai.com.au/ethanol.php/2005/11/00000005.html

Interesting read - http://autorepair.about.com/cs/generalinfo/a/aa102100a.htm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/96631-shell-optimax-extreme-100-octane/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Theres a massive thread on this somewhere......

But yeah, mixed results, some ppl reckon the car pings etc, but when the car is tuned, better results.

Ofcourse Nissan wouldn't endorse it, why would they risk it and open themselves up to potential lawsuits.....

i didnt think higher RON increased performance. The RON of the fuel from my understanding does not increase power alone.. i thought it just meant u can tune the car for more power. I thought it was the way the fuel burns. ie. how well it burns etc.

but its been out for a while and i remember some mates who did testing at their uni on petrols which had ethanol and depending on the %'s added was clean and ran fine.

we've been using 10% blended fuels lately cause theyre upto 10c+ cheaper then normal... but the risk of issues coming up are a little greater but then again it once again depends on how much is blended. Mind u for skylines and turbo cars i wouldnt use it... the 100 shell i would... cause its just 98ron with a 5% blend which is stuff all.

Refer here, for effects of using ethanol blends.

Nissan Aust. doesn't recommend the use of this fuel in pre 04 vehicles, but they do not state why. It would be nice if they just outlined the problem areas.

That just outlines problems with a 20% blend. Also I believe Nissan discourages the use of 10% blend.

Optimax Extreme is a 5% blend, which as far as I know is quite safe to use in just about any car.

Edited by shyster

far less if not none...

im pretty sure some racing fuels use ethanol.

here... like i was trying to say it just lessens the risk of knocking (higher RON) so that means u can tune your engine more to gain more power BUT higher octane fuels wont give u more power alone

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating

A common myth amongst petrol consumers is that adding a higher octane fuel to a vehicle's engine will increase its performance and/or lessen its fuel consumption; this is mostly false—engines perform best when using fuel with the octane rating they were designed for and any increase in performance by using a fuel with a different octant rating is minimal.

so unless your car is tuned for 100RON your wasting your time buying it based on "performance gains", however if your car is tuned for 98 then this will mean you will be quite safe from knocking.

In regards to corrosive effect on metal fuel parts, this is from the Shell's website FAQ...

I have heard reported in the media issues with ethanol and engine corrosion and its effect on metal parts. What steps are you taking to protect my engine and its components?

The issues you have heard about relate to a situation in 2003 when some retailers were selling fuel products with more than 20% ethanol blend without sufficient disclosure to customers.  Shell was not involved in this practice and took active steps at the time to promote that our fuel did not contain ethanol.  It has now been shown through extensive testing and research that a maximum 10% ethanol content is suitable for many cars which is why the Federal Government has set a maximum 10% ethanol content in Australian fuel.  Shell has determined that a formulation of 5% ethanol optimises Shell Optimax Extreme (the same level that Governments in Europe are encouraging in their specification).  All ethanol used in Shell fuel contains a suitable corrosion inhibitor.

Now if the Optimax Extreme may not sound too bad for metal parts, in regards to rubber fuel parts shrinkage issue, perhaps changing all your fuel lines, basicaly anything that is made from rubber, to braided steel lines. Of course it's recommended to use ADR approved ones, e.g. made by Maltech in Geelong, whom some of us has organised a group buy with.

It's more expensive than normal optimax....wth?

I thought the whole point of blending ethanol was to reduce the overall cost of the petrol....i think Shell may just be targeting the performance market....

Also, check out this guys dyno results after a tune, hell if I could get those results just after a "tune" I'm all for it.......

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=95349

i thought it would be obvious that nissan is going to say dont use it...

compare it to the "this product may contain traces of peanuts" thing

when half the stuff that says it would never have a peanut anywhere near it....they say that to cover their ass in the worst case scenario etc...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Harness is for a s1 Rb25det, and it is engine and lower harness.  the old harness had broken off plugs and was in very rough condition/exposed wires and splices etc. it is not able to be put back on the car, I could visually inspect to see if they had rewired any pins on the ecu plug. The fuel pump definitly isn’t turning off it’s an external pump and very loud you can hear it. Will look at the other harness tonight, am also going to pull the fuel rail and watch the injectors spray, will update here with what I find. Pretty sure at this point it has to be something to do with injectors because car will fire up on starting fluid and cas is clicking the Injectors. Fuel pressure is steady 43psi 
    • Check the injectors flow evenly, and are actually flowing what you and the ECU think they should be flowing. If it's starting up on starter fluid, you have a fuel issue. Is it possible under cranking your fuel pump is turning off?   The harness you replaced, is that the whole engine harness? Do yourself a test, and drop the old harness on and plug it into the Z32 ECU. It's possible they've wired things different. From memory S1 to S2 is different in RB25 and you may have a wrong loom
    • I haven’t pulled the injectors to watch them spray yet but they are clicking from the cas and all of the spark plugs are wet with fuel. I’ve thought the cylinders were being flooded from the beginning and was hoping fuel pressure would fix it. Tonight I am going to pull the rail and watch the injectors spray. Don’t know how to test/diagnose if the plugs are firing in correct sequence but that should be a timing thing and as far as timing goes my car still has the half moon for the cas can only install it 1 way. And my mechanical timing is 100% correct I posted photos above. Confirmed with the balancer on and off. 
    • I checked spark on all cylinders and they all visually have spark with the plug pulled and grounded, but plug 1 is the only one that fouled. This was a running swap that blew up and was rebuilt by a machine shop, put a new wiring specialties harness and did all gaskets, studs, and bolts while it was out.  compression is 135-150 across all cylinders. Aside from that from my understanding with the z32 ecu and maf the car should start regardless. The wiring for TPS and the dual 02 sensor/ dual knock sensor stuff shouldn’t actually stop the car from starting or even running well, (just slightly rich)  they just give fault codes. Car supposedly is supposed to start as long as you have z32 afm and ecu with the nistune base map and that’s info coming from a well known and trusted tuner who does a lot with SR/RB (Rsenthalpy). After more trouble shooting today where I’m at right now is that the cas is sending signal to the injectors they click while spinning the rotor, Fuel pressure is now set at 43psi, all cylinders have good compression and all of the plugs looked great (just wet with fuel) except for cylinder 1 which was very black (cylinder 1 has 150psi compression). all of the coils generate spark if pulled out and grounded out on the head. On the fuel pump car just pops into the exhaust. On starting fluid car will fire off. Hard to tell if all cylinders are firing off but definitley a couple. sounds like all of them but it’s only for 3-5 seconds hard to tell. 
×
×
  • Create New...