Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

this is a good read

got a gcg hi-flow rb25 turbo going on my r32 now

other mods include 550cc injectors and powerfc and the usual kinda shit

i'll watch this thread and post results when/if i get them

our cars sound similar apart from PFC, would be good to see the differance

  • 2 weeks later...

man my engine must be buggered or sumthin...i have a high flowed turbo (not a GCG) but loooks exactly like it, and im only making 245rwhp and thats with tomei cams and 14psi and power fc....anybody know wat could be my prob?can i have a buggered head gasket? or could it be the rings?

wind it up the boost to 18psi or so.. it's probably the only way you'll get power out of it.. then it will be laggy and possibly kill an old engine. Sounds similar situation to my highflow rb25 (its running 16psi at the moment).. not the best match for rb20.

man my engine must be buggered or sumthin...i have a high flowed turbo (not a GCG) but loooks exactly like it, and im only making 245rwhp and thats with tomei cams and 14psi and power fc....anybody know wat could be my prob?can i have a buggered head gasket? or could it be the rings?

i wish i had that, ive got 253hp@22psi. RB20 hybrid, exhaust housing too small. new turbo here i come.........

sounds similar to mine..

nf: I think you'll make maybe 20% more power with raising the boost another 4psi or so... so thats quite a good result if you ask me.

may as well post up my chart as a point of comparison.

16psi on highflow rb25 turbo (rb20 actuator), k&n panel filter, 3" exhaust right thru, highflow cat, hybrid cheap front mount 450x300x75, turbotech boost valve, SAFC.. So seeing as mine is AUTO, and non-powerfc seems about in range with nF above by taking 20-30% off.

I don't think there was any temperature correction put in for the 32 degree day.. non-shootout .. So allowing 10-15%.. mine is about 150rwkw on any other dyno (probably feels about 150rwkw too).

A fair bit of blowby at 16psi exhibited in my engine, whereas was none at 12psi... so any more isn't a good idea in mine at the moment.

post-1332-1134802264.jpg

sorry don't have a scanner or camera here so i'll try describe

also graph doesn't have RPMs so someone might have to convert

in 3rd gear, peak power at 114km/h, made full boost by 82km

graph is a nice curve too :(

mods that are important:

- split dump

- splitfires

- iridium plugs

- k&n pod

- 3 inch full exhaust with a hi-flow cat (crowbar brand)

- the turbo is r33 gcg hiflow with i think the r32 actuator

- 550x100x76 intercooler

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...