Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep cops are going mental again this year, which I don't see as a bad thing considering the number of idiots on the road during the Christmas/New Year break. Sadly though, as usual, their focus isn't the "Fatal Four", it's "Speed and those other three things". If it can't be policed by sticking a camera on the side of the road or by comparing a sign to a number read out on a measuring device they're not interested.

Get rid of the right lane dawdlers, the 60-in-a-100-zone grannies, the shitboxes, the weavers, the non-functioning indicators, the tailgaters etc - they are far more dangerous than someone marginally over our ridiculously low speed limits.

That said, during the Xmas break, Cressida > Skyline :huh:

yer thanx man, i couldnt see any speed camera in the cop car. and i thought they have to tell u if they are recording the conversation. but newayz i dont have much to loose.. thanx for ya help :huh:

I think you will find that the only hope you have of winning this case is if the speedo was incorrectly calibrated in the cops car and good luck with that.

Other than that a cop following you for a set time and matching speeds with your car has always been considered as a valid way of estimating someones speed in a court of law. In fact before the advent of radars this was pretty much the only way of them correctly telling what speed you were going.

If you plead not guilty and lose, you will be fined the maximum penalty plus court costs!

I'm afraid your going to have to bend over and lube up for this one as you really have a snowballs chance in hell of winning sorry to say.

But you can blame all the tossers in imports who think that it is cool to do skids in residential areas, do the traffic light grand prix, go drifting around roundabouts in the rain, who make their unfeasibly loud blowoff valve go off for no reason other than to draw attention, race on the M1 ..... etc etc

With all those cops out and about Donut King is going to make a fortune.

I don't know why everyone is so worried. If you aren't doing anything wrong then they can't touch you. If you give them a reason to look for something then you are just asking for trouble. I have been driving my line for over 3 years now and apart from a storm season where I was the catch of the day a while back, I don't get bothered unless I'm doing something stupid.

If I'm doing something stupid and I get pulled up, I cop it sweet. If you keep your calm and ask the right questions, they can't get you for following speed unless it's for more than 200 meters and they have to be at a constant distance. C'mon people use your heads.

I got off of a following speeding find attempt today. He said what speed where you doing. I said 60,which was true give or take a few ks (Hey I was watching the road not my speedo) He said nup more like 80, I said no way as I was going through one of those "Traffic calming devices" at the time, he checks my wheels and exhaust then lets me go saying "Take it easy next time" so I think he was wanting me to admit that I was going over the limit and when I didnt he had nothing :P

Ozy you have my PM.

As 85URK has said get ALL the info you can and you account of events, letter of complaint first, otherwise you will have to defend it in court. THough if you have already admitted to speeding then the whole thing is a waste of time.

i've heard that the cops often get an admission of guilt by saying something like "do you have any reason for speading"

if you simply answer "no" then you are actually saying "no, i don't have a reason for the fact that i was speeding"

you have to reply with "i wasn't speeding", as was said by Bunta to reject their claim, and then stick to it without being an idiot about it

otherwise they have you admitting you were speeding.. and you just get done without lube

If you show the officer respect then they will in turn show you respect..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...