Piggaz

Pew pew pew. Jap junk strikes again .

Woo, I keep my left nut.

Lol. Just a hunch

I'll bet my left nut it's some super sexy swanky Jap Junker.

It will end Soon.

Tomei manifolds are utter junk.

Problem? I'd be furious Pete!!!! Good news in a way... But WTF?

Looks great. Needs some oil on it.

Oh golly gosh

Copper mixes are sprung centre.

That's EXACTLY what happened with mine also. It was quite annoying.

How do you find it under brakes? Given a hard enough stab, does the rear end feel like it's floating around?

That will be plus customs bum ramage. I got my front from SVS and it got stopped. I asked to "make it under the magic number" but they wouldn't do it. With the dollar the way it is, just go to Just Jap.

Where are the purple covers you did?

That A-LSD diff belongs in the bin. It really does.

Being a V-spec, it isn't just buy a diff centre and chuck it in. You need a Non V-spec diff housing and possibly the shafts, I know I did. A mate from WA went from a Nismo GT pro to a Quaife rear and he prefers the Quaife.

Opening scene he says "low mount twins vs similar sized single". So do the twins need to be high mounted to be fair?

There is RND in twins There is no difference between GTX 3582R and a GT3582 compared to say a GTX 2860 to a -5. Same rear turbine, only difference is the front fan in both setups. I'm 100% certain a -7 would come on earlier than a GTX 60mm but you know yourself it wouldn't get close to 400 kW, let alone 450. So the smallest aftermarket factory position turbos against a 450 kW single. Matched everywhere, gates are making a nusiense at just over 4000 but go onto make 450 plus on a stock engine. I don't give a fook, you know what's on my car but I can't see the inaccuracies in this when I couldn't tell you what low mount twins to put on to do 450 plus and be "on" by very early 4K would be on a very basic 2.6.

Different engine config.How long does the exhaust manifold have to be on an R35 to run a single? How would you route that disaster?

But that's the thing. FACTORY position twins vs a single. The only twin system out there that's "high" mount is the EFR twins that will run the factory front pipes. Intake is a no go. Twin high mount 2835's with external gates won't come on early like that on a 2.6 for example. What's else is there? Matty from wa went from -5's to an 8374 on a 3.0. Made more grunt everywhere, on 5-700 rpm earlier and fell onto boost in 1/3rd the time according to his motec. 63's according to simon come on 100rpm earlier. Still missing 400 rpm at best.

So what would be a fair comparison? In your opinion? I still can't see a factory low mount twin setup cracking 19-20 psi on a 2.6 with shitty 260 poncams at 4000 ish and go on to make 460 kW. RS's won't do it -5's won't do it 63 mm GTX's which come on 100 rpm earlier than -5's (on a 2.8) won't do it. 60 mm GTX's MAY do it but I haven't seen a result. I agree it should have been done between GTX 60's, but do you honestly think they will do their thing so early on a basic 2.6? They struggle to push stock turbos at 4000 (unless you have your cam timing)

Mick, If you want to run twins in their factory format, what does it matter if the single has "custom piping"? Of course it's custom, it's not factory. If you choose to run factory position low mounts you can't hold that against the single setup. That's your choice, unless you pay for custom work.

Whatever a 2.6L can do, a larger one can do that and better.

Twins vs single? He has a single already.

Would need a 6266 at a minimum. No bigger split turbine housings available