Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah before i set my boost to 12 psi,i drove around with a fmic but with stock boost.I noticed there was a different in flow and my car drives smoother.(maybe its what type of cooler u choose,tube&fin or bar&plate).Not advisable to run more than 12 psi with the stock turbo.I think 12 psi is the optimum boost level for it anyway(correct me if im wrong).Hi flowing isnt a bad idea i guess?

13.6

-outlaw racing-

havent experienced spiking with turbosmart type 1

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-156406
Share on other sites

Yeah I had this set-up but I also installed a boost controller. I found that with the standard boost setting there was more lag down low but better top end due to the larger FMIC.

Anyway, I set my boost to ard 11-12psi which was ok. I was told that the standard turbo can go to around 14psi but at that setting I had trouble with air/fuel ratio.

I think its better for your turbo if you have a custom dump and front pipe and better for your engine to have a safc or ems if you decide to consistently run higher boost (14psi) with standard turbo.

Just my two cents....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-156520
Share on other sites

Everyone has some lag, but whether you experience more due to a FMIC I don't know for sure, my car seems more responsive with it, and it definately produces more power. If lag has increased then it is not a significant amount, but I have quite a different setup than most, so I don't know how this has affected my results.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-157332
Share on other sites

The No.1 problem with cooler selection is incorrect size. It amazes me a little that people consistantly get fmic that are sometimes over 200hp more flow than required. And I am amazed even more by mechanics and tuners who make this recomendation to customers when they would never do such a thing with camshaft selection,head porting or carby size.

Just pick your HP and 'then' pick the matching parts.

I don't think I've seen a GTST with a stock turbo yet with a properly sized fmic.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-157556
Share on other sites

rev,

Your right that most people have overly large intercoolers, but I for one don't wish to swap intercoolers everytime I do something to my engine. I have all my airflow side setup in anticipation of a larger turbo, therefore I currently have a larger FMIC than I currently need.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-157745
Share on other sites

GTS-Vspec,

Not a problem. I assume you are already planing to get a turbo of the correct size for the intercooler.

This thread however is about the stock turbo. And many people are blissfully un-aware of the waste of money a larger intercooler can be if done the wrong way.

Look forward to seeing you rip it up with the GT30 on!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-157778
Share on other sites

I think anyone that fits a FMIC is planning on a turbo upgrade of some sort, whether it be hiflo'ing or a larger turbo, as once you've done the fmic there isnt much else that can increase the power of the car but increasing the turbo (after ecu, fuel system etc). But at the same time once you start to play with the boost you really need to get a better intercooler to control temperatures. No point in fitting something slightly bigger than the stock one just to suit the stock turbo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-158232
Share on other sites

Rob upping the ic size and front location, is a good idea even on a stock turbo if you want that exra power or if your car is going to see sustained boost (like on the track).

The problem is that if I was to ask " how much HP does you intercooler flow?" Most wouldn't be able to tell me.

Then upgrading to a larger turbo, being good and all, will also mean the intercooler was not selected with a specific turbo in mind.

This kind of 'bolt on' mentality is the reason 80% of all the modifed street cars (including V8s and everything else) perform fairly ordinarily considering the amounts of money thrown at them.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-158551
Share on other sites

What results do you think I will attain with my trust unit then? Will I get slower 1/4 mile times? I can see how moving the side mounted intercooler to the front would assist with air-flow, but at the same time the stock cooler can only flow so much cooler air to the turbo and because of its small size can only cool the air slightly. A friend of mine with a 180sx mounted a GTR cooler into the front nose of his car and even with the limited flow (180sx's nose must suck for a front mount as hardly any of it is exposed at the front due to it dipping off) he noticed the car running considerably better and actually found boost to come on quicker. Before the fmic he was running 14.1's with it he ran a 13.6 I think, no other adjustments. Anyway with the fmic and lower tyre pressures I hope to be biting at rev's heels :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-158555
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...