Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Gee they all this makes them sound like a real good turbo!!! lol

Laggy, weird design, china born.......im beginning to think they might be worth the little money you pay for them!!

THERE IS NO DUMP FOR THE Wastegate flap like Garret and EVERY OTHHER BLOODY TURBO.

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...71_452203_1.htm

you mean like this one? It's also a fairly common arangement on hitachi, mitsubishi, and as a result trust internal gate turbos from the mid 80's to the mid 90's aswell. The v band arrangement isn't uncommon either.

You're talking about a turbo that is obviously old tech (at least the core) but it makes it's claimed power apparently and it costs bugger all. It doesn't mean i want to go out and buy one as i think you would be better off getting something a little easier to install (read common t3 exhaust arangement) and so save some money there that can then be spent on the turbo itself.

What i do like about these turbo's is they are obviously aimed at the performance enthusiast on a budget, the same as the china intercoolers and the china manifolds and the china radiators and the china coilovers, they offer 3 versions to suit your application, they have warranty, and they offer install if you can't do it yourself (which means warranty support).

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...71_452203_1.htm

you mean like this one? It's also a fairly common arangement on hitachi, mitsubishi, and as a result trust internal gate turbos from the mid 80's to the mid 90's aswell. The v band arrangement isn't uncommon either.

You're talking about a turbo that is obviously old tech (at least the core) but it makes it's claimed power apparently and it costs bugger all. It doesn't mean i want to go out and buy one as i think you would be better off getting something a little easier to install (read common t3 exhaust arangement) and so save some money there that can then be spent on the turbo itself.

What i do like about these turbo's is they are obviously aimed at the performance enthusiast on a budget, the same as the china intercoolers and the china manifolds and the china radiators and the china coilovers, they offer 3 versions to suit your application, they have warranty, and they offer install if you can't do it yourself (which means warranty support).

well

similar exhaust outlet for the wastegate flaap.

end of story these turbos are for ricers who just want a "turbo car"

NOT A TUNED PERFORMANCE CAR! ( as the japs say)

POS TURBO!

so are you gonna keep bagging something without fact?

no one post has any.

That design wouldnt be so bad as its cleanly split, not like other int gate turbos that are close to the turbine outlet

so are you gonna keep bagging something without fact?

no one post has any.

That design wouldnt be so bad as its cleanly split, not like other int gate turbos that are close to the turbine outlet

nismoid.. i have facts

in my own brain from experience

ive tuned 5 cars with these turbos.. customers like them.. nice big top end power after 5000rpm till redline *usualy 8,000rpm* but they suck for street racing!

period!

drag only or watever

Edited by s13rb26

here is a lag diagram

a7t08.jpg

on a ca18det

kkr 330(smaller one)

full boost between 3000-3500 not bad for a ca18 if you ask me.. good midrange as well

other mods it has is a z32 airflow meter and gtr injectors

Edited by fatz

Yeh i agree thats not too bad acutally. Seen as i would be looking at using it on an RB20 i would be looking at the smaller version, i.e. not the 480, i think its the 440?

And guys theres no need to argue, were all friends right?

......right :)

nismoid.. i have facts

in my own brain from experience

ive tuned 5 cars with these turbos.. customers like them.. nice big top end power after 5000rpm till redline *usualy 8,000rpm* but they suck for street racing!

period!

drag only or watever

are these the 480 on 2Ltr or 2.5Ltr motors?

If it gives me 250rwkw and full boost by 4000rpm I don't care where it was made...

my mat ehad one on his S14.. and yes IT IS LAGGY.... started boosting at 5000rpm..

Personally i liek RESPONSE@!!!

1.1 ex housing on an SR is going to be laggy, no matter what brand turbo. On an RB25 it may respond differently..

Getting back onto the original topic - does anyone have a dyno printout or experience with one of these turbos on an RB25?

1.1 ex housing on an SR is going to be laggy, no matter what brand turbo. On an RB25 it may respond differently..

Getting back onto the original topic - does anyone have a dyno printout or experience with one of these turbos on an RB25?

thats the baby kkr330

totaly shit turbo once again........

will pop in no time

thats the baby kkr330

totaly shit turbo once again........

will pop in no time

been on for about a month

anyone who puts the 1.1 on small capacity engine is asking for lag

im frends with the distributor so i can get a 10% discount fo a limited time

i think he has sold over 40 units in 4 months and hasnt had one return under warrenty

pete

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...