Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ARE YOU SURE YOUR CLUTCH ISNT SLIPPING??

sounds like thats what it is to me, makes sense....under load boost increases rapidly and revs increase rapidly while giving you less power.

but you prob know what clutch slip is....mayb something more complex than i could understand lol.

Grab the profec manual and double check the setup.Two things previously mentioned was checking hoses and waist gate,I`d go with those first.If a work shop installed the ebc then double check for sure.After twenty five years playing with cars I Know if you look at something long enough you`ll work it out.

you need a biger wastgate flap. period :(

On a standard turbo? i don't think so. He has mentioned a few times that they have replaced the hi-flow with a std turbo, but fault still exists.

Having read the other posts i would;

1/ Remove the pin that attaches the actuator arm to the wastegate flap and ensure that flap moves freely.

2/ Then disconnect the exhaust from the dump pipe.

ie: remove front pipe, cat and catback system.

Have you replaced the hose to the actuator?

Have you attached the actuator hose to a differant location?

actuator hose has bee replaced with thicker hose and is attachted back to where it was before.

we will try to drop the exhaust and see how it goes, and the actuator arm test aswell....

if the exhaust is dropped and the problem is fixed does that mean it could actually be the stock dump pipe? because the exhaust system is fairly flowing

Change your dump pipe and try it.. suprised to see a high flow put on a car before a dump pipe actualy.. ive seen it happen.. also try wire the wastegate flap open and take it for a drive.. sure it will be gutless but see wat it does

if it makes boost high up in the rev range than the wastegate hole is to small and

but if it still does the same thing with a stock turbo it would be a bit wierd for the standard dump pipe to be affecting it but it could be possible

Sounds like a problem with your boost controller or your boost controller stepper motor which is the mechanical device that will control how much pressure etc. Try buying ableed valve for 20 bucks install that and disable your boost controller. Manually control your boost and see if it still happens. -- if still happening sounds like an actuator problem! Best of luck..

ps hope it does not cost you too much money. I have a problem with boost surge at the moment which i am trying to diagnose although could be an expensive excercise? -- might just replace my turbo and boost controler as it will save wasting money on stuffing around in the long run and i believe my problem to lie with these two items. Plus new bigger turbos are fun!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...