Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well I believe good deeds should go rewarded, and also once people have their engines built they never usually have them apart again.

So I thought I would post some pics of the internals of my engine. The engine was rebuilt in mid 2003 and has since covered a touch over 30,000kms running between 300 and 350rwkw. As like most GTR drivers I look after my car, but to put it honestly, I also flog the guts out of it alot of the time too (any GTR owner who says they dont is a liar!) so I was curious as to what condition the internals would be in once stripped down being driven hard alot with that much power on a relatively stockish engine.

The rebuild included a slight overbore (20 thou) due to some mild scoring on the bore, Arias forged pistons, standard conrods shot peened with ARP2000 rod bolts, new main and conrod bearings, bit of head porting and polishing. Just your basic bare bones rebuild I guess with a bit of added strength. I have attatched some pictures of the cylinder bore, main bearings, conrod bearings and piston. The worst part of the engine was the piston which is covered in carbon due to running rich, but besides that the engine still looks almost like brand new. Hone marks still visible on the bore with no scoring, main bearings still look nice and fresh, same with rod bearings. The only thing that appears to have copped a flogging was the oil pump (no crank collar), which is showing some signs of wear. I will post up a pic so people know what the problem actually is/looks like.

Anyway, nothing really overly exciting in this thread, just thought some people may be curious as to what such an engine would look like on the inside after a decent amount of km's. A big thanks goes to Greg and Warren at Pro Engines (www.proengines.com.au) who originally built the engine, which has stood the test of time quite well indicating it was an excellent rebuild (I was expecting a lot more carnage to have gone on internally). If you need a rebuild, see these guys! :)

post-2672-1140215271.jpg

post-2672-1140215302.jpg

post-2672-1140215325.jpg

post-2672-1140215344.jpg

post-2672-1140215363.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106291-rb26-inside/
Share on other sites

Are you trying to say GTR's should always run better oil pumps ? I.e JUN, ETC?

No, im saying any pre 1994 R32 GTR owner should fit a crank collar or R33 GTR crank. That oil pump didnt have much life left in it before it would have let go... even a wee bit too much throttle at cold oil temp could have been enough to see it go bang. The crank collar extends the drive on the crankshaft into the oil pump so its not a problem anymore. The 1994 R32's and all R33 and R34's came with a longer drive for the oil pump from the factory.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106291-rb26-inside/#findComment-1961192
Share on other sites

Nice thread, thanks for taking the time.

May I ask what the run in procedure was and what oil you have used during the 30K?

Also why did you pull it apart?

Run in was 500km on mineral oil never using more than 25% throttle, then it drank nothing but Motul 300V Chrono. Fronm 500km to 1000kms used 50% throttle and put some more load on the engine, did another oil change at 1000, did another 1000kms going easy on it, changed the oil and flgoged the guts out of it :D

Its apart to get the crank collar fixed... the recent thread on here of the conrod exiting out the side of the block worried me enough to spend the cash to get it done :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106291-rb26-inside/#findComment-1961353
Share on other sites

haha, how much carbon can you get onto the piston.

tune it a little leaner, or else the carbon will get hot, glow and cause pre-ignition from the hot spots.

and then bye bye motor.

when you re-asemble are you going to rehone and use new rings or does it all just go back together again as is?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106291-rb26-inside/#findComment-1961394
Share on other sites

AFR's were stupidly rich when running on boost, hence all the carbon. It needed a rebuild 30000k's ago because a valve guide had broken and scored the cylinder bore slightly (hence the reason for the overbore too). No cracking, no problem with oil cooling lines, all a-ok.

The rebuild was fairly cheap, cant remember the exact price, but it wasnt alot. The reason its apart again is to fit a crank collar and new oil pump to it, then its all being slapped back together again with a fresh set of rings (and minus the carbon on the pistons). I noticed you have a 94 model GTR, in which case every one I have seen came fitted with an R33 crank from factory, so the crank collar shouldnt be a problem for you.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106291-rb26-inside/#findComment-1962303
Share on other sites

Thats alot of carbon for low 11's, just under high load.

How is the cruise mixtures around 14.7:1 or rich as well?

Im no expert by any means, but to get carbon like that, it would take more then just running a bit rich under boost. It would have to be running rich every where.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106291-rb26-inside/#findComment-1962554
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...