Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ECUTalk v1.3.5 final has been released (along with beta 7 before it), which mainly just adds support for Active Suspension control unit (on Q45 Infiniti and similar) amongst other minor changes:

ECUTalk v1.3.5 final - Changes from v1.3.5 beta6 below:

  • #113 Make log files .csv rather than .txt
  • #114 Provide minimum log update functionality
  • #115 Attempt ED connection if EF fails
  • #116 Add support for Active Suspension control unit
  • #117 Fix 'Code 55' for Diesel to say 'No Errors Detected'
  • #118 Remove Flush Wait Time option (still in .ini)
  • #119 Support unlisted serial port names via ini file
  • #120 Add dec points to Height sensor (inches)/MPG

ECUTalk v1.3.5 can be downloaded from here.

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just bought one of your cables cheers Peter. Would be awesome if you could write ECUtalk for android especially considering it comes with a handy USB plug such as on the samsung galaxy s :D.

as far as im aware, no FTDI drivers for android? once there are, assuming android devices have USB host, and assuming mono for android works well (in early stages - http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2011/Jan-04.html) then ECUTalk v1.4.0 out soon, will have a fair few changes which will improve chances of it working with mono.

but FTDI would be the first hurdle - http://www.ftdichip.com/Drivers/VCP.htm

email FTDI if you want to add an extra request for android drivers. and perhaps google FTDI android drivers and see what's doing. i think some people are trying to port drivers to android or something.

ipaq, a windows mobile pocket pc. something with the 22pin connector (not new ones with just mini usb).

bigcol on aus300zx had a thread with his installation but all the pictures are down. here's another.

http://www.ecutalk.com/compatibility.aspx

  • 3 years later...

Here is how to make an Ipaq serial cable so you can connect your Ipaq to your Consult serial cable so you can use Ecutalk on your PocketPC. This will work on all IPAQ 1900, 2200, 2400, 3800, 5400 and 5500 Series models. I made one for my HP IPAQ h5550 and it works perfect

IPAQcon.pdf

Does anyone actually have EcuXtend?

doubt many people actually bought it considering they were charging $600 before ecutalk came out, and perhaps $200 which is still way too much, after it came out.

about the only one who may have any idea would be caz from cazracing (no longer in business) who tried it herself (as she was a reseller i imagine). aus300zx forums might be best place to find her if she's still active

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...