Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A bit of an update for those who are interested in the KKR480 and how it works on an RB25.

The graph below is for an internally stock R33 (normal head gasket too) with 550cc injectors, pump, Power FC, FMIC and 3-inch exhaust with an aftermarket cat. The owner fitted the turbo himself with a KKR dump pipe. The car was tuned by CRD, making 263kW on their dyno and a week later ran on the Mainline dyno at the Auto Salon, making 261kW. This is the sort of power and response most people are getting, with around 19psi boost.

post-5573-1146272840.jpg

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

it comes on at 4200rpm and its on from there.

sounds a bit too laggy for the power its making.

a standard hiflow should make equiv power and be more progressive and responsive

looks to be a lag lag lag, peak, wheelspin, peak type turbo

Still doesnt explain how one car makes 260rwkw @ 19psi the same turbo using 16psi makes 300rwkw+

So which result are you backing up Ben? CRD or the other one?

There is a large variation in the results for an identical item

A bit of an update for those who are interested in the KKR480 and how it works on an RB25.

The graph below is for an internally stock R33 (normal head gasket too) with 550cc injectors, pump, Power FC, FMIC and 3-inch exhaust with an aftermarket cat. The owner fitted the turbo himself with a KKR dump pipe. The car was tuned by CRD, making 263kW on their dyno and a week later ran on the Mainline dyno at the Auto Salon, making 261kW. This is the sort of power and response most people are getting, with around 19psi boost.

The passage gt has a Fresh rebuild of a stock RB25DET, metal head gasket, 3inch exhaust from turbo with no CAT, 720cc injectors Q45 AFM, Grande FMIC, Power FC. 550+hp fuel pump Full R33 drivetrain with Modded Diff and its 303.9kws.

294kws with 550cc ish injectors (so I'm told). But still with all the above mods.

It looks all in the same ball park considering the difference in mods.

***Nismoid.. Insert comment here.. (This is where you don't admit your wrong and that its a laggy POS and that your car is sooooo much faster)***

G.

Still doesnt explain how one car makes 260rwkw @ 19psi the same turbo using 16psi makes 300rwkw+

So which result are you backing up Ben? CRD or the other one?

There is a large variation in the results for an identical item

Thats because the 260kw figure is real

The passage gt has a Fresh rebuild of a stock RB25DET, metal head gasket, 3inch exhaust from turbo with no CAT, 720cc injectors Q45 AFM, Grande FMIC, Power FC. 550+hp fuel pump Full R33 drivetrain with Modded Diff and its 303.9kws.

294kws with 550cc ish injectors (so I'm told). But still with all the above mods.

It looks all in the same ball park considering the difference in mods.

***Nismoid.. Insert comment here.. (This is where you don't admit your wrong and that its a laggy POS and that your car is sooooo much faster)***

G.

Sorry i dont get what this post is meant to mean?

Are you talking about your car or the one that Benhpi has provided graphs for?

There is no mention of the Benhpi car making 294rwkw anywhere in his post

I would think he would mention it if it were the case

Sorry i dont get what this post is meant to mean?

Are you talking about your car or the one that Benhpi has provided graphs for?

There is no mention of the Benhpi car making 294rwkw anywhere in his post

I would think he would mention it if it were the case

I thought you would have remembered our 6week debate? My fault...294kws was what the passage made with the smaller injectors but all the same mods.

G.

So your car?

I do remember putting the question to benhpi about the large variance in results. If your not commenting on his car... then i dont get it.

Anyway, its not in the same ballpark at all Gary, infact over 40rwkw and 3-4psi is a massive variation.

Injectors cant be attributed to that difference.

I think i might quote myself as you missed my post

Still doesnt explain how one car makes 260rwkw @ 19psi the same turbo using 16psi makes 300rwkw+

So which result are you backing up Ben? CRD or the other one?

There is a large variation in the results for an identical item

So your car?

I do remember putting the question to benhpi about the large variance in results. If your not commenting on his car... then i dont get it.

Anyway, its not in the same ballpark at all Gary, infact over 40rwkw and 3-4psi is a massive variation.

Injectors cant be attributed to that difference.

I think i might quote myself as you missed my post

3-4psi is a big difference, I listed a few differences other then Injectors including a 3inch turbo back zorst with no Cat to mention a few. I'll spare you the self quote but I think you know this will make a difference in power output.

To sum it.

Benhpi listed a car making 260kws and the Passage has made 294, 297, with 550cc injectors but much more mods(Fresh rebuild, metal head gasket, 3inch exhaust from turbo with no CAT, 550+hp fuel pump Full R33 drivetrain with Modded Diff) thats where I was going with "Ball Park".

2 dyno's, 2 different companies both over 300kws.

I raise and call?

You imply that its "fudged" but remember when I offered you to put money on it? And even at a dyno of your choice you didn't won't anything to do with it. So its either "fudged" or its not. I'm standing behind mine and you are on the fence.

G

Heres the part your all missing

Ben Ellis = Mr Hpi

HPI = Only publication pushing / promoting these turbos

Otomotto = Ben Ellis's

Starting to see a connection ppl?

They are not a very good turbo at all. They might be reliable, but they certainly arnt responsive.

Rather a GT30 any day.

3-4psi is a big difference, I listed a few differences other then Injectors including a 3inch turbo back zorst with no Cat to mention a few. I'll spare you the self quote but I think you know this will make a difference in power output.

To sum it.

Benhpi listed a car making 260kws and the Passage has made 294, 297, with 550cc injectors but much more mods(Fresh rebuild, metal head gasket, 3inch exhaust from turbo with no CAT, 550+hp fuel pump Full R33 drivetrain with Modded Diff) thats where I was going with "Ball Park".

I totally agree with you. 4psi is a big difference.

However, to sum up the differences you claim... and quite simply, they make little to no difference.

Lets go through them shall we?

1) Injectors will not increase power.

550cc can flow enough for 300rwkw, so the injectors as a "different" mod are discounted straight awat

2) Head gasket, you have a thicker one that the benhpi car...

Again, this is a mod that is not going to increase power at all. It will allow you to run more boost without detonation to make more power...

But in your case you are running less boost - 16psi so that makes no sense

3) 3" exhaust. Benhpi & your car are both running a 3" exhaust. So thats discounted aswell

4) Drivetrain - another useless fact. The car benhpi is talking about is an R33 GTS-t.

So your car has R33 runinng gear, so does the comparo car... So i cant see that making a difference

5) Benhpi car is also running an upgrade fuel pump the same as you car.

Another mod discounted

There are a lot of things here that you are claiming are aiding in the "40rwkw with 3-4psi less" difference that quite simply have little to do with outright power as they are supporting mods that are the same across 2 cars.

They might not be identical brand names, but the parts are upgraded non the less.

The only difference that can affect power is the CAT... you dont have one.

But its not a "40rwkw with 3-4psi less"difference as the Benhpi car no doubt is using a hi-flow cat of some description aswell (he mentioned a different one)

A fresh motor maybe a minimal increase... but benhpi would surely inform us if his test car had a tired motor.

So i'll trust that both cars motors are near enough the same condition

Could you please provide any extra mods apart from the above that i have missed?

Maybe they are whats helping you make the power? Something you have forgotten like a set of cams?

This is a good thread and lots of information contained in it. So if you could further add any other mods which are aiding your much better power figure that would be good

TJ - i agree.

Although i already knew the connections with otomoto/hpi/ben etc.

hey all,

first off. remember me R31Nismoid?? yeah thats right,

second, you know what i love about the internet and internet forums?

everyone is a f**king professional, now i`m not going to sit here and tell you

all i know everything about turbos, but i will tell you the i have been in the passage

and f**k me it moves, gary and john have found a setup that works for cheap

and the rest of you are just pissed off, GET OVER IT,

third. R31Nismoid from both arguments on this forum and the r31 forum you have never

show a dyno sheet for you apparent "369rwkw" and everytime there is an offer for you

to come see the car you back down, WHY IS THAT... are you scared??

i think you need to stop criticizing ppls setups and idea, and actually say something

usefull, you are not the be all and end all of performance modifaction and engineering.....

paulr33 you should take note here aswell,

paulr33 - plotting a graph "too much free time with paintbrush" isn`t hard, hell if you want

i can tell what key you have to push on a dyno dynamics computer to change the grid, power scale,

rpm scale, a/f ratio, x-factor (that the one that changes the correction factor) and other verious

readings. your proving nothing by post "potted" graphs

R31Nismoid good for you, your a Moderator on sau so ban me if you want but that

just prove the fact that your scared of being provin a loser/wanker/liar/wrong etc.....

the only "good information" here is propaganda and ppl`s opinions,

i do have one question, if the bp is a measurement of ambiant air pressure/density, what happens to this

figure when it is compressed by a turbo??

]second, you know what i love about the internet and internet forums?

everyone is a f**king professional, now i`m not going to sit here and tell you

all i know everything about turbos, but i will tell you the i have been in the passage

and f**k me it moves, gary and john have found a setup that works for cheap

and the rest of you are just pissed off, GET OVER IT,

"it moves" compared to what?

its so laggy it quite likely feels like it rocket when it finally hits boost.. you know the typical lightswitch turbo set up, nothing to everything.

What time has it done?

i have been in the passage and f**k me it moves

Thanks for that technically informative post p-hizzel.

I really appreciate your opinion there.

It has really cleared up a lot of questions i have about this turbo and the setup by the fact that it "f'ing moves"

Why would i ban you? Although your post is pretty much technically pointless... its almost off-topic.

Im not criticising, im actually trying to get to the bottom of the results as they are totally different on virtually identical cars.

I've had a number of PM's over this thread so obviously people are watching for the answers as much as i am.

If it makes you feel better i'll get in touch with XTC and get a copy of the graph for you from AutoSalon last year. Hell... i'll even go down to RPM and get the other graph aswell.

Send me a PM with your e-mail and i'll gladly send it on in a few weeks when i get them both.

Can we get back to the technical side of the discussion now?

Still doesnt explain how one car makes 260rwkw @ 19psi the same turbo using 16psi makes 300rwkw+

So which result are you backing up Ben? CRD or the other one?

There is a large variation in the results for an identical item

Actually the car which recorded 242kW (HPI34T) has since been retuned by Advan and now makes 260.7kW at 19psi. Since my own car also makes 256kW at similar boost with lower compression (RB24 with Tomei pistons) I figure 260kW at the wheels is a realistic expectation for the KKR-480 on an RB25DET. This was all I wanted to get across with my update, but it seems people are getting very emotional about the subject.

This topic is mainly about the 480 and from what ive read just seems to be a dyno turbo and to laggy for normal street use. What are peoples oppions about the 430? For $650 it if it is a direct bolt up could be a good upgrade for say 220rwkw or so?

In the first page someone is saying about all the modifcations which need to be done for the 480. is it the same as the 430 does anyone know?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...