Jump to content
SAU Community

Kkr And Monsta Turbos

BOVed

By BOVed,
in Forced Induction Performance

 Share

Recommended Posts

Dr_Drift Veteran

Dr_Drift

Posted
Posted

I'll be finishing the Cefiro with the RB25DE + T70 later today so I'll scan that when we're done.

Last reading was 249 rwkw @ 17 psi

Completely STOCK RB25DE with a T70 600hp, 600x300x100 FMIC, GTR Injectors, Z32 AFM, Desno 600 hp Fuel Pump, Remapped R32 GTST ECU, and that's it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

JimX Grand Master

JimX

Posted
Posted
Ebay turbos are BAD......have a look at these links

http://www.mx6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=110947

I think the funniest thing about that pic is they had to stamp the word "TURBO" into the housing, just in case you're not sure what it actually is. Like "nah, it's really a turbo! honest! just read the letters!" ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Robo's Mentor

Robo's

Posted
Posted
Bear in mind that Canberra is comparatively high altitude, so the BP should be lower.

Check your barrometer, i dont think it would ever go to 930. Currently in Canberra its 1023, With cyclone Tracey coming it might get down to 980 at its worst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
GT-PASSAGE Enthusiast

GT-PASSAGE

Posted
Posted

Well I just found this thread...

The passage has so far made 303.9rwkws on 16psi (not with stock injectors) but with stock internals and has done 300+ at 3 different dyno locations. As for all the weather men, Canberra is at 93-96BP it is at altitude and is the true reading, (most weather reports measure at sea level) you can see all the summernats dyno sheets are around that reading.

KKR is a little laggy cuz its big, but for bang for the buck its unreal....Nismoid and others are just pissed they spent 5 zero's and have ball park same power.

KKR all the way

Possible 340rwkws at 20psi but also possible boom with stock internals.

A little bit of info is dangerous huh?

G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
paulr33 Grand Master

paulr33

Posted
Posted

whilst your graph certainly proves max power is possible it still doesnt prove much else.

you said yourself its a laggy mofo. average power makes the car quick on the street, not peaky power like the KKR that you've posted.

the info is hardly dangerous nor does it prose a threat to anyone else on this forums that insists on using corret turbochargers for their application

sounds like it would suck on the street (lag city)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GT-PASSAGE Enthusiast

GT-PASSAGE

Posted
Posted
whilst your graph certainly proves max power is possible it still doesnt prove much else.

you said yourself its a laggy mofo. average power makes the car quick on the street, not peaky power like the KKR that you've posted.

the info is hardly dangerous nor does it prose a threat to anyone else on this forums that insists on using corret turbochargers for their application

sounds like it would suck on the street (lag city)

Won't debate that, not run a 1/4 yet.. On R31 I never said it was lightning just posted power.

G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted
KKR is a little laggy cuz its big,

KKR 480 is not big. A GT42 is big, a t04z is big

A KKR is firmly in GT30 (Garrett and HKS) territory which is a medium sized turbo upgrade family.

Same as TD06's and other turbo brands, which looking at results on this forum, dont even come close.

Do you actually have any technical knowledge to share as to why it is so late to deliver power?

Or are you gonna pretend its because its "big" (which has been established, that it isnt)

Im pissed off :) news to me.

Im actually quite amused you can sit here and try and pass it off as a viable upgrade

I had useable power some... 2500rpm earlier. Or maybe 3000rpm.

Its just so hard to tell with your graph as its got the powerband of a turbo double its size

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1144976656.jpg

Go run a time then come back and tell us how good it is.

You'll find yourself falling into a hole inbetween gear changes so im predicting a time in the 13-sec zone

Until then, its a paper weight in terms of a performance upgrade without some evidence

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GT-PASSAGE Enthusiast

GT-PASSAGE

Posted
Posted
KKR 480 is not big. A GT42 is big, a t04z is big

A KKR is firmly in GT30 (Garrett and HKS) territory which is a medium sized turbo upgrade family.

Same as TD06's and other turbo brands, which looking at results on this forum, dont even come close.

Do you actually have any technical knowledge to share as to why it is so late to deliver power?

Or are you gonna pretend its because its "big" (which has been established, that it isnt)

Im pissed off :D news to me.

Im actually quite amused you can sit here and try and pass it off as a viable upgrade

I had useable power some... 2500rpm earlier. Or maybe 3000rpm.

Its just so hard to tell with your graph as its got the powerband of a turbo double its size

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1144976656.jpg

Go run a time then come back and tell us how good it is.

You'll find yourself falling into a hole inbetween gear changes so im predicting a time in the 13-sec zone

Until then, its a paper weight in terms of a performance upgrade without some evidence

With the modded actuator its boosting from 2800RPM so if you are 3000 under that, then I'm impressed :D

And I told you that you are pissed :nyaanyaa:

PS Why so hostile on KKR did one rape your sister or skyline :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted
With the modded actuator its boosting from 2800RPM so if you are 3000 under that, then I'm impressed :(

And I told you that you are pissed :(

PS Why so hostile on KKR did one rape your sister or skyline :D

If it starts building @2800 and takes what... 3000rpm to build to 20psi...

I dunno how else to term un-responsive

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GT-PASSAGE Enthusiast

GT-PASSAGE

Posted
Posted
If it starts building @2800 and takes what... 3000rpm to build to 20psi...

I dunno how else to term un-responsive

Yep 2800 with the big boot at 5000rpm (on 16psi)

In the process of gettin some hoops for the strip I'll see how we go.

G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • WMDC35
      Superlative Сasual Dating - Authentic Ladies

      By WMDC35 · Posted

      For sure, bromance with common shit box interests.
    • GTSBoy
      Rear suspension upgrades

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • GTSBoy
      Pillowball/Hardened Runner Hybrid Approach

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      Superlative Сasual Dating - Authentic Ladies

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      Aren't we already on one? SAU unforgettable bromance.
    • joshuaho96
      Misfire/stalling issues

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...