Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK before everyone screams out do a search or whatever; please take 5minutes to read what I'm asking... I've done the searches and there is absolutely nothing on SAU regarding this (especially the HKS item).

Basically, I've hit a barrier on my upgrades path - the stock ECU + SAFC2 combination just not pulling its weight and is restricting my current setup to a lowly 198.2rwkw. All the factory protection systems kick in and "terminate" any dyno runs we attempt (fuel cut, rich and retard systems etc. etc.)

I have sussed out 3 systems that will be able to fix this problem and provide me with much better tuning capabilities than what I have right now. At the end of the day it's not going to be 100% effective, but it'll be close. The three on my mind now are ITS from Unigroup, Haltech e11v2, or the new HKS F-Con Is.

Question: Which one should I go for? (below are some Pros and Cons)

* ITS I've never really heard of and its never gone on a 34GTT before - pretty much experimental work here.

* ITS is relatively cheaper though for the unit, install and tune (from their website)

* Haltech will work after wiring it up in "piggy back" mode, using all signals barr the gear change signal

* Haltech is the most expensive of the three for unit, install and tune

* Haltech has been developed in Australia, heaps of technical support and its upgradeable

* Haltech system will remove need for AFM, existing EBC.

* HKS item is brand new and largely un-tested/used in the Australian import scene

* HKS Japan advertises that it will work on the R34GTT (as per their website)

* HKS is slightly cheaper than the Haltech when everything is installed and tuned.

* HKS unit I dare say will have to be "learnt" by the tuner as it is a new system

Any opinions or ideas would be much appreciated... looking at making a decision within the next week or so, want to put my money somewhere so I max out the "bang for buck" factor :)

Cheers

Stan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/107854-which-ecu-to-get-r34-gt-t-tiptronic/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You got more power because you had a full exhaust and a bigger turbo :) I would've broken 210rwkw if I had the rest of my exhaust on the car - damn people taking so long to make it!

Well the e11v2 has been given quite a big rep amongst the high HP auto boys... they said that they modify the loom so it's hooked up "piggy back" style - leaving only the gearbox signal intact.

I'm still tossing the options around though...

hey stan

Tom at bd4's has been specialising in HKS fcon V & S for years

dont think at all that if you go down there that he will have to "learn" anything..

and i pressume u added the cost of the harness in the price of the fcon?

also PM me if your genuinely intrested in a HKS fcon V, may be able to help you out..

Hehe, shhh.... it's a secret that I didn't have a full exhaust on the day :) Just to say, 200rwkw is possible without a full exhaust >_< (but not reccomended, it's the expensive way to do it)

Next step is to sort out exhaust (once it's fabricated), injectors and ECU. Then we tune for 240-250rwkw using the stock box. By this time I'll have access to a few gearbox options and do the transplant. Following that I'll be tuning for 270-280rwkw

The rest of the rwkw will have to be made up for using engine work (I hear cams make a big diffrence :huh:

Thanks John... Yeah, the cost for the HKS system will be about $1,800 all up (fully optioned) - this is an at-cost price.

The F-Con V, that will be different to the F-Con Is right? The only reason I'm considering the HKS system is because HKS actually says it works on autos :D

Well that rules that one out :) I need the piggy back option otherwise my gearbox shits itself.

The other option is to go a fully manualized auto box - then we could run all sorts of ECUs (but that is cheating)

Stan - make sure that you double check that it works on R34 GT-T autos..

Maybe get someone who can read Japanese to check the HKS site..

Or find out if anyone else is running one.. Just looking at the site myself, yeah.. it says "A/T" but.. that doesn't mean it can run all of them..

HKS sounds like a good choice otherwise..

DAMNIT.. google translate SUCKS ass..

Looking at this page in babelfish - it says R34 RB25DET - M/T..

http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/t...on_harness.html

so.. double check it..

for anyone looking at a translated page on the FCON-V..

http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/t...fcon_v_pro.html

FCON normal..

http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/t...%2ffcon_is.html

Edited by Links

MAF (what u currently have) is better than MAP.

MAF measures air volume coming in and tells the ECU

MAP measures air pressues and gusses amount of air coming and tells ECU. The MAF is better for street cruising where pressure is jack all but varying amount of air coming in changes quickly and constantly. Also when on WOT the MAP will always say X amount of air and never increase as its reading boost pressure (fixed by your boost controller) and then telling ECU XYZ amount of air. Whereas MAF will always show an increasing amount of air coming in.

This basically means MAF will be more accurate on the say 20x20 map grid as it can move around very freely based on air coming in and always show an increase (ie: use the map resolution you have).

You should read up on how they both work to understand as it will affect how the car runs and drives. You should also look for an ECU with closed loop feedback (fuel economy) and knock sensor support

MAF (commonly known as AFM or Airflow Meter)

mass air flow sensor

MAP

mass air pressure sensor

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
×
×
  • Create New...