Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That applies to the Intel X25 only. There are many other types of SSD, intel do not have the monopoly on them, nor are they to be considered competent in SSD technology. No other SSD has issues with 'sector remap fragmentation'. I have a runcore SSD in my EEE and they do not suffer from any said problem.

Intel != all ssd's. TBH it sounds like you're just repeating what you've read from slashdot or arstechnica.

Intel > all SSD's

Load times are no doubt impressive with SSD's however their write performance sucks. Intel owns in this department offering performance similar to a mechanical HD where as the other SSD's fall far behind which is where the old 'stuttering' problem individuals complain about.

IMO Intel is SSD at the moment no other drive comes near it.

My little old AAKS peaks at 120mb/s holds that until close to 200gb then starts to tail off achieving an average read over 640gb of ~92mb/s according to the ol' hd tach.

The 'other' SSD's that don't have the issue Intel have simply suck when it comes to write speeds. Write speeds are important for a workhorse, again... SSD = great for a little lappy that doesn't see any 'real' usage.

I would consider an SSD for installing a few games on but even then for the $$ its hardly worth it.

Unless the other SSD's can sort out their write speeds and stutter as well as Intel sorting out their low level fragmentation issues I won't be jumping to SSD.

The SSD in the Asus EEPC is great but honestly its not really noticably faster than the AAKS HD apart from booting Windows.

Probably a bad example of a performance SSD in those Asus EEPC's but they are great for what they are, yes I've noticed a little stuttering with that SSD which sucks but you learn to live with it.

If you don't notice any stuttering etc what SSD is it you use?

Intel > all SSD's

Load times are no doubt impressive with SSD's however their write performance sucks. Intel owns in this department offering performance similar to a mechanical HD where as the other SSD's fall far behind which is where the old 'stuttering' problem individuals complain about.

IMO Intel is SSD at the moment no other drive comes near it.

If you don't notice any stuttering etc what SSD is it you use?

I use a runcore SATA mini PCI-E aftermarket replacement. Its a 32gb model. I've ran the benchmarks using HDParm on both my laptop and the SSD in the EEE.

the one in the EEE gets 125MB per second read, and 55MB per second write. My WD Raptor does 55mb Writes and 60mb Reads. The Green WD drive I have as my primary data store gets 55MB per sec reads and 45MB per second write. The SSD write speeds equal the WD Raptor I have in my main PC.

Intel do not own the SSD market. Not even close. Their idea of a wear levelling algorithm is to simply split the file up into multiple fragments and randomly allocate a logical block. Not a good idea.

There are two different types of SSD technology. MLC (Multi level cell - slower, less reliable) and SLC (Single level cell). SLC is much faster than MLC but at a greater cost, hence it doesn't get used quite as much. That said, MLC drives are getting faster at writes - indeed, the SSD in the EEE (Runcore) is an MLC based drive. The RunCore SSD is about 2.5 times as fast as an early MLC on reads and 6-8 times as fast on writes.

To compare with the MLC that came with the EEE - 8gigs. It has writes of 2MB a second max and 12MB/s reads. Once replaced with a fast runcore module, the 'stuttering' problem (which was Windows writing/changing files) simply vanishes. It makes the EEE like a new PC.

FYI - http://www.voitech.com.au/products/runcore...1-and-s101.html

-D

then something is wrong there damo

i have been using a pretty new HP and would say that the HP shits all over the dell with the same specs

how can 2 pcs have the same specs and have such a big performance difference...

god i hate dell pc's

then something is wrong there damo

i have been using a pretty new HP and would say that the HP shits all over the dell with the same specs

how can 2 pcs have the same specs and have such a big performance difference...

god i hate dell pc's

Just answered your own question :) we use Dell pc's. Optiplex 745, dunno the specs, but id rather use a piece of paper.

do a "start", then "run" and then type in "dxdiag"

that will give you the specs of your PC

We use Dell Optiplex 755 or HP 7800 DC

Both of them are Dual Core, 2 GB RAM, DVI card etc etc

love the HP

Intel Core 2 6300 @ 1.86GHz, 512mb RAM. In brackets it says (2 CPU's) :D

Core 2's Duos have two cores per die (and quads have 4) ;P Unlike a P4 with hyperthreading which reports back two cores but actually only has one...

-D

Intel Core 2 6300 @ 1.86GHz, 512mb RAM. In brackets it says (2 CPU's) :D

there is your answer damo...core 2 = 2 cores

shit you need more RAM and a better CPU lol

Mine at work is a Core 2 Duo, 2.8GHz, 2018 RAM, 384 MB Video Card etc

works like a dream

Ok here's one for ya guys, got a 300GB hard drive that I store some of my files on. The other day it took a shit, so now when I boot up the PC with the 300GB in, it hangs while loading Windows. I've tried it in 3 different PC's now and same problem. Tried it again today and BAM, in it went, had access to all files, etc. Then I stupidly restarted and it all went wrong again. Any ideas how I can recover the files off this hard drive? I should have grabbed them when I did but as I said, stupidly reset :cool:

Usually I have no problems recovering atleast some data from dicky hard drives but this one has me stumped

its munted, if it boots again be ready to get all the files off it quick smart.

data recovery programs usually only work if the drive works, try booting using Heirin (sp?) it has tools to fix up all major brand hard drives, might get her up n running again

i have a few paper weights like ur drive

yeah thats the one

i have a few that spool up just fine when powered up, but are cactus..

one of them however i saved using the boot disk, is a WD drive, and i had it running for a good 6 months afterwards in my firewall

there is your answer damo...core 2 = 2 cores

shit you need more RAM and a better CPU lol

Mine at work is a Core 2 Duo, 2.8GHz, 2018 RAM, 384 MB Video Card etc

works like a dream

I've been using an EEEPC the past month or so while my desktop is being built. It drives me nuts with it's slowness - loading any webpage it lags up for a few seconds - its worse when I'm loading pages on multiple tabs. Cant wait til my new computer built - so far its half built and saving up to grab the rest then I can finish it off and use it.

there is your answer damo...core 2 = 2 cores

Thats not 100% correct, the core 2 doesn't means 2 cores, as the Quad CPUs is also called Core 2 (my Q6600 has the Intel Core 2 Quad sticker) the "2" refers to the 2nd major refresh of the Intel core architecture, there was an original Intel Core Duo CPU (no 2 in the name) it was dual core & it was released in the laptop market only, it had the prefix "T" for the CPU models (my mum's laptop had one of those CPUs; a T2500 which ran @ 2Ghz).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...