Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

let me get this straight

10% lower

so this car on any other dyno would make ......

319 divided by ten is 31.9 in case you dont know / cant work it out

319 by plus 31 would be 350

THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY REAR WHEEL HORSEPOWER FROM A STOCK TURBO

does that even look remotely close to being right for you? dont dance around the question, answer it! does that look like something that would normally happen on a R33 Skyline powered by a RB25DET motor with minimal mods? just answer that, i dont want stories about corrections , timing, dynos, just answer me that

jesus snap out of the day dream!

Edited by [teejay]
  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Didnt realise that this thread was about Bretts car

the 53 degree inlet also seems pretty funny.

im not accusing anyone of anything or the like, my call here is that this thing must have hidden mods. you just need to find them.

End of the day Brett made his power 2 odd years ago, old news, lets stick to this other mystical freak 33 shall we?

Edited by [teejay]
All Dyno Dynamics Dynos should read almost identical results if in Shoot out mode? No matter what intake temp!

Wrong. Well, sort of. The inlet temp sensor has to be placed in such a way that it ACURATELY reflects the ACTUAL temp of the air entering the engine (usually before the filter).

u would think u work for xspeed or hyperdrive. give steve a break, he is only tuning it he doesnt know the exact details of the internals/mods. :)
^^^ i agree....Steve is only doing the job he was asked to do...maybe Teejay you should pay for the labour to find out what is in this car....then we would all know what 'mods' it has!!!

Ezz up on Steve he is a top bloke!!!!

Ive offered a free dyno run to confirm the figure... no reply as of yet. Would be on a brand new DD dyno , 4wd in ground, with the latest and greatest of everything.

I dont work for any performance shop, i work for the Water Corp, ... but i also work for Perth Street Car magazine.

Would make a really cool story "car makes amazing power with little mods"

Call my questioning of this "research" since i get sick of the crazy amount of people who will come and make wild claims like this (not saying this is!).

Ease up on who and why? Im not attacking anyone, I'm just incredibly keen to see a real answer to this mystery, not "oh it made the power its true, it must be" Im not questioning the power, just how its made. read my other posts to see where im coming from. Steve chooses, to answer, i choose to question, its all been done in a civil non rude / attacking / slanderous manner, so whats the issue?

I just want it played out to an honest answer. If it ends up being that its made the power with the stock turbo, ill applaud it.

Till then get your emo out of here, and let some interesting Skyline related talk keep going. Wasteland for you if you cant handle the skyline chat.

Teejay there is no emo from me...but Steve is only asked to tune the car not find out what mods it has to make the power....Its up to the guy to get someone to check out how it can make this power and as you put it snap out of the day dream or prove that it is from a stock turbo with min mods!!!

OK i cant back the 299.1 car yet but early this week a GTS with SAFC cooler and cat back made 292rwhp.Before you start it did go to the plex on wed this week.13.1 all night with a best of 13.0 I do think thats a WA Stock GTS record. Was the Silver S2 R33.Im getting a time card to post but the speed was about 180ks.As Rev210 said Track is proof.

We also have full Shootout 4WD dyno about to be fitted.

OK i cant back the 299.1 car yet but early this week a GTS with SAFC cooler and cat back made 292rwhp.Before you start it did go to the plex on wed this week.13.1 all night with a best of 13.0 I do think thats a WA Stock GTS record. Was the Silver S2 R33.Im getting a time card to post but the speed was about 180ks.As Rev210 said Track is proof.

We also have full Shootout 4WD dyno about to be fitted.

I was there on Wednesday night and can confirm the car did run a best of 13.08 from memory. I work with the owners girlfriend and was watching the car closely. I believe it still has a stock dump pipe!

Still on 235/45/17 road tyres (not drag rubber)

The ironic thing is that the owner was disapointed that he couldn't do 12's

Wrong. Well, sort of. The inlet temp sensor has to be placed in such a way that it ACURATELY reflects the ACTUAL temp of the air entering the engine (usually before the filter).

If you are a shootout workshop and running in shootout mode you must place the sensor at the air filter. Top Racing are shootout workshop!

All this talk of different Dyno's, and prove it on the track etc, really amuses me.

The thread title is........... 319wrhp Standard Turbo! (maybe).

You cannot prove any of this without dismantling the turbo. FULL STOP.

And any of you other guys with "freaks" should think about this.

I know my Turbo was "hi-flowed", as I had it done when I killed it (as stock) with too much boost.

I wonder how much anyone else knows how stock their turbo is ?

Will continue to watch this space with amusement.

El Bee

what was too much boost?????

The guage I had then showed 17 lbs a coupla times before it went.

I had built an Electronic Boost Controller was dialling it in with a gut full of piss and my Son at the wheel.

It may have been a combination of me fiddling with the load points and a lack of consistency in the runs.

Anyway, that turbo was certainly not a freak. It got 184 rwkw on a dyno day (maybe a bit friendly even).

El Bee

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...