Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I disappointingly had to tow my car back from my auto sparky while under the impression that I was finally going to drive it home. The setup- S14 Silvia, NEO RB25DET, big turbo with all related bolt on’s and Link Plus ecu. Ive also gone with a wasted spark setup as the motor didn’t come with coilpacks and R34 ones proved very hard to source. My sparky seems to think that the reason it turns over but doesn’t start or hold idle is related to the shabby ignition leads (loose fitting). I rechecked the leads last night and had another go but it still wouldn’t quiet start. Its defiantly firing and sounds like its going to start but doesn’t quiet make it. I managed to start it once but only kept it alive by constantly holding the throttle. As soon as I took my foot off the accelerator it died instantly. Does that hint at anything?

Also, would a shabby tune on the second hand LinkPlus stop the car from idling? It was originally on an R33 spec RB25DET so surely the tune can’t be the reason why it won’t even start?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/112246-why-wont-my-new-engine-idle/
Share on other sites

The RB25 from the GTT has a few more inputs/outputs than previous models it could be a 1000 & 1 possibilities, including the traction control throttle body on top of the engine remaining closed.

If you're chasing a set of R34 coil packs, I've got a full set currently in the for sale section.

LinkPlus utilizes a map sensor. Theres no way i can use a stock ecu. The loom was made up from scratch for the linkplus, so the plug is different etc. And we modified the plenum to face forward and totally removed the traction control in the process so that cant be the problem.

I managed to get it to start today, albeit only with my foot constantly on the throttle. It sounded like crap, missfiring badly, similar sound you would hear if you had got a couple of faulty coilpacks which again leads me to think the leads might need replacing- i did re-check them however. I kept revving it out but it died as soon as i let off the throttle. Any ideas guys?

LinkPlus utilizes a map sensor. Theres no way i can use a stock ecu. The loom was made up from scratch for the linkplus, so the plug is different etc. And we modified the plenum to face forward and totally removed the traction control in the process so that cant be the problem.

I managed to get it to start today, albeit only with my foot constantly on the throttle. It sounded like crap, missfiring badly, similar sound you would hear if you had got a couple of faulty coilpacks which again leads me to think the leads might need replacing- i did re-check them however. I kept revving it out but it died as soon as i let off the throttle. Any ideas guys?

Not sure on the setup with the link as I have never tuned one but is it setup for the rb trigger input? First thing's first check that you have injector pulse and spark to all cylinders. Then check its in the right spot by removing all plug leads, unscrew no1 spark plug and with it connect to the coil turn over the motor by hand with ignition on and check the spark is some where near TDC. This is just a start as its been said there are about a thousand different things it could be.

If its gurgling and playing up and sounding crappy when you rev the engine then check your intercooler. As elementary as it sounds I just helped put a ca18 into a onevia and the engine was blowing smoke and carrying on. Once we mounted the intercooler properly then she was good.

For you it might be a little different though.... rb25's are great when they run good aren't they (i got problems too :thumbsup: )

so you have spark/ fuel/ and fuel pressure?? does the link ecu have a base tune?? if not dont you have to set up some kind of idle base turn?? Also fouled plugs will cause the same thing, either due to sitting and being turned over and not heating up. (covered in black fuel shit)

Edited by race_snooze

Ok, i went out and bought some brand new spark plugs today and fitted them. I checked the spark on all cylinder's and all were firing. Injector pulse is fine. IC piping is fine. Still no go :). Im trying to avoid towing the car to a workshop and saying "take it off my hands and get it running and tuned properly" as im not keen on getting stuck with a couple of grands worth of bills. But it seems like this is the right option, id hate to put another frustration-caused dent on my bonnet!...

hmmm this is a toughie you got on your hands.

Maybe the link computer with the r33 mapping has somehow reset itself?

I also heard that the NEO rb25 passes about 25% more exhaust flow than a normal rb25 due to the differences in variable valve timing. I was told the r33 model runs like a switch - on and off at certain points, whereas the r34 model is variable at all times, based on what the computer is sensing.

I'd first of all go to a performance shop/tuner that you know and ask some questions first. If you give them the impression you'll come back or bring the car in for their help they should be able to give you a few ideas on where to start looking - just to eliminate the simple stuff first.

Its either compression, ignition, or fuel related mate - the 3 elementary parts of the engine to make it go..

Best of luck anyway mate :)

do you have software to tune the ECU?

if so, hook it up to a laptop and check what size injectors it's set to. This can cause problems so check this and see if it makes any difference. Tuning software can probably display sensor readings from the engine, so you may also be able to check if anything's not working.

dont know if this could have anything to do with it, i just quick read over this post.

but i was reading in a car mag the other day and they couldnt get the car to idle properly with aftermarket ecu (power fc) so they had to use the stock ecu to run idle and piggy back a diff ecu to control the rest (piggy back is the right term i think)

but if all else fails mayb that might help! good luck

My r33 wouldnt idle with maps from 2 other cars, I got lucky with the 3rd. I have a wolf 3d with MAP sensor. Like you I just wanted to get the car running, then drive it to get tuned and not get ripped off. I think the problem is that all the base timing, tps open and shut values, etc must get programmed in from your car. Aftermarket computers cant adapt like a stocker ecu can.

Dont know if this helps...

Alex.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...