Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 147
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Okay,

Here is my subject. A level 6 Bravo Armoured Landcruiser.

Here I am focusing on the light damage caused by a suicide bomber on a motorcycle.

Please not that the only injury to the ex-pat consultant was a burnt elbow. Not bad considering.

By the way old mate, has met his maker and I am sure he is enjoying his 99 Virgins!

post-9747-1181027396_thumb.jpg

post-9747-1181027440_thumb.jpg

post-9747-1181027474_thumb.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

i usually do any photo comps on "flickr"...but i reckon being on a car forum that it should be related to cars and such....just my 2c worth..

anywho, just got this on the weekend..... hope you like!

759601157_a28176fcbd_m.jpg759603693_6594801fb9_m.jpg

  • 1 month later...

hey guys, im new to this part of the forums i think.

i enjoy photography. im not very good at it, i just have a 3.2 mega pixel point n shoot camera and my camera phone, but i enjoy taking pics. so i thought i would participate.

Something Old

1972 - Claret (Part Of Dads Collection)

SkylineWeeklyChallenge003.jpg

Edited by finster

went out last weekend to some racing with some other photo peeps and tested some ways of doing motion blur...in my previous post above i used too fast a shutter speed, which basically 'stopped' any motion effects.....well i think this ones a bit better!!

truckracingAug07397.jpg

thing is, trying to get a lot of 'motion blur' without actually blurring the car will take a few attempts at different shutter speeds...one of the guys was using a canon with one of those HUGE 'L' series 400mm lenses,(the grey ones) and he got the same effect using 1/90...were as i used 1/125..both on iso 100. just needs a lot of practice!!!

Edited by dodgsun
  • 2 weeks later...

Heres a few random pics. For all the pics i used a Fujifilm S5600 digital camera except for the first pic

I took this on my phone while driving next to my mate (nearly dropped it out the window)pretty good for a phone (nokia n73 3.2meg camera on it.

post-39300-1188620466_thumb.jpg

Just a random close up of a lego man lol

post-39300-1188620782_thumb.jpg

This is a pic of the kwinana drag strip (i was hanging over the top of the wall)

post-39300-1188621065_thumb.jpg

This is a close up of the front wheel and bar of my VT wagon (showing how low it is)

post-39300-1188621183_thumb.jpg

This is a silouhette (spelling) of some mates at bull creek skate park (i love this shot)

post-39300-1188621226_thumb.jpg

And this is my mate doing a double peg grind at subi skate park

post-39300-1188621496_thumb.jpg

Edited by Daniel R32
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...