Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

0.90bar is beyond the standard turbocharger limits so its just more heat. you wont gain anymore power but if you insist on doing it for the sake of "im running more boost" knock yourself out. the intake temp will rise though

as long as you have an intercooler and a good tune, you will be able to run 1.0 bar fine, but your turbo wont last, the stock one wont handle anything above 13psi

your stok internals are good for approx 270rwkw with a good tune, some people have even seen past 300rwkw(probably due to a higher reading dyno)

this is not true at all. the stock compressor is past its effiency past 12psi. for every psi you dial in you add in more heat and increase the shaft speed. the more heat you dial in, the less power you make and the quicker the shaft speed spins. also with an unsafe tune the exaust outlet temps will soar will killing the exhaust wheel.

more boost = more power

ONLY when you are in the effiency zone of the compressor wheel

ie: its true when you are running 7psi on the stock turbocharger and up it to say 9psi. as when you dial in more pressure, more airflow follows. airflow makes power, not boost.

0.66/0.68 bar is the stock for >4,500 rpm on R33 - so run it up there otherwise your losing out.. as for 0.75 - well.. mine spikes to that on occasions.. see how you go - get your FMIC run maybe 0.7/0.75..

been discussed alot before - people recommend 10psi daily max and 12psi max full stop out of stock turbo as the exhaust wheel tends to desintegrate..

hes right, you can get 300rwhp out of a stock turbo, providing you have a good tune and a ECU, liek in his case, a power fc

ive seen many skylines make over the 210rwkw mark with just power fc and airfilter, fmic and exhaust.

but you have to be careful, some dynos use different correction methods which give higher readings than those of other dynos

your stok internals are good for approx 270rwkw with a good tune, some people have even seen past 300rwkw(probably due to a higher reading dyno)

so many people make way over 300 not due to a "higher reading dyno" due to a nice turbo and nice tune

Edited by thizzle

The 2psi will give more hp, just not too much more, as you said it will increase heat a fair bit and shorten the life of the turbo!

Generally I would say 400hp (rb25) is the limit on standard internals if you treat it right and have a very good tune :(

I think what he means above is that some dyno'd read higher than others, so a person may say i make 300rwkw on standard internals where as on a diff dyno they'd be making 270ish rather than having a diff turbo n set up?

Edited by jazza08
so many people make way over 300 not due to a "higher reading dyno" due to a nice turbo and nice tune

ive seen a few have that aswell, mines got 297rwkw on stock internals, but ive also seen a few around the 300rwkw mark on a low reading dyno have their pistons crack, under a conservative tune aswell

in the end its completely up to the owner of the car, if you are willing to risk your engine blowing then by all means, boost it up and tune it up well. otherwise rebuild your bottom end then work from there

most dynos use the shootout mode for power runs, its a common fact, on shootout mode, the dyno will give a higher reading than if they used another mode. simply because of the fact that the correction method used, compensates for heat and other factors more in shootout mode than other modes

Edited by Kryostaisis
ive seen a few have that aswell, mines got 297rwkw on stock internals, but ive also seen a few around the 300rwkw mark on a low reading dyno have their pistons crack, under a conservative tune aswell

in the end its completely up to the owner of the car, if you are willing to risk your engine blowing then by all means, boost it up and tune it up well. otherwise rebuild your bottom end then work from there

most dynos use the shootout mode for power runs, its a common fact, on shootout mode, the dyno will give a higher reading than if they used another mode. simply because of the fact that the correction method used, compensates for heat and other factors more in shootout mode than other modes

no doubt...i agree

i would feel alot better about thrashin my car with a rebuilt bottom end..

i still think the 25 is under estimated tho..

1 bar on stock turbo = same as 12psi

so that extra 2psi is just more heat

likely to make it go bang

Just cos I was confused :

1 bar = 14.5psi

so I assume he means the extra 2.5psi is lost cos of the extra heat.

hehe

Edited by khunjeng

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey all,   I’ve got an RB25 with a trigger kit that includes a crank wheel, and I’ve hit a wall trying to sort a timing belt tracking issue. The belt either rides right on the edge of the cam/crank pulleys or walks slightly forward once the engine starts. It tracks okay-ish for a moment, then creeps right to the edge—and honestly, it’s stressing me out.   I’ve spent hours removing and reinstalling the belt, double-checking everything:   Tensioner setup is good, checked multiple times Idler pulley and washers are all in the correct places Followed the RB25 timing procedure step-by-step     The only thing I changed was the rear crank washer—I swapped the OEM one for a Neato version, and it made things worse. The belt now sits even more forward than before. I’m beginning to think the crank trigger wheel itself (from the trigger kit) is the issue—poor design or slightly off dimensions.   What’s strange is that with the previous belt setup, it actually ran fine for a couple of years—around 4,000 to 5,000 miles, even with hard driving and high RPMs. But even then, the belt was always riding right on the edge, and I know that’s not ideal or safe long term.   At this point, I’m debating whether to:   Machine a few mm off the crank trigger wheel to bring it back in line, or Replace it entirely with a better-designed unit     Only thing is, I already have the Cherry Hall sensors, bracket, etc.—I just want to replace the wheel only, not the entire kit. Anyone know a brand or supplier that sells just the crank trigger wheel on its own?   Would really appreciate any feedback—especially from anyone who’s run into this exact issue and found a reliable fix.   Thanks in advance.
    • Hi...a little refresh. Is Nistune gonna be enough to run BoV? Or do i need some proper ECU? 
    • Yep that's pretty much what I want to see. Racecars that look and sound like the Group A but with newer tech underneath to make them faster and safer. I'm sure there's enough VK-to-VN commodore, E30 BMWs and Foxbody mustangs shells around to make up a decent number of cars with hopefully a couple of sierras, rx7 and R31s in there too. 
    • Contact Jessestreeter.com/Skevas Racing/JustJap for a new r34 rb gearbox or go a cd00# conversion. No point playing with unknown condition gearboxes.
    • Such a shame places like Amaroo Park have been redeveloped, smaller tracks always make for good racing. Cheers for sharing @PranK there's some good Lakeside video's too. Its so hard with older the cars as parts are so rare and everything was made for a particular chassis at that point in time. Even the V8 Supercar Blueprint era cars are all different between each chassis within a team as they learnt things and made improvements. The COTF cars between each Chassis builder is different too especially motor/oil systems/intakes. The Group A stuff is worth so much too especially chassis with good history. The only way to do it would be composite panels and similar engine drivelines to the original cars. Ford sierra running Focus RS driveline, Commodore running a short stroke LS/LT or a Falcon with coyote and a H Pattern dog box. Could use a standard ecu across all models with a Torque Map and DBW for parity which is not even used in Supercars currently. Hell a TCM is almost a full chassis car these days and the suspension is not even close to standard style in the front running cars.  
×
×
  • Create New...