Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What about the oil coming through the windage tray and causing the crank to throw too much of it up into the bores? I ran my car at the Oran GP circuit all day on the standard oil level and it's fine...or is it because my tyres are too shit to be able to generate the g-forces required to cause a problem? *lolz*

A catch can catches the oil that would otherwise be put into your intake system and burnt along with the fuel. When it is put through this way it lowers the octane rating of your fuel mixture thus bringing you closer to detonation and engine death.

90% likely it burns oil because you have worn rings. start with a compression test.

or just fill the oil regularly :ban:

GTST we overfill the race cars all the time, but you can go too far and the crank can start slapping the oil = bad. Only go a little over full, just under the hump in the stick like T04GTR said

T04GTR iis right in what he is saying.

After going through one engine I have become a little worried about it too so for the past 18 months I have been overfilling the oil in my gts-t aswell. I have been using the whole 5.5 litres in the oil container.

I generally use penzoil synthetic 5w50 (I think).

Havent seen my car in a while so I'm shaky on the exact numbers now.

I get bugger all extra oil in the catch can and its just good to know oil stavations probs will be minimised.

  • 2 weeks later...

What should the oil pressure be sitting on?

my engine let go on saturday night, and the pressure was on 2 on the gauge in the dash. I had just done an oil change 2 hours before hand using MOTUL 4100 turbolight (10W40 im pretty sure)

What should the oil pressure be sitting on?

my engine let go on saturday night, and the pressure was on 2 on the gauge in the dash. I had just done an oil change 2 hours before hand using MOTUL 4100 turbolight (10W40 im pretty sure)

Your using the wrong oil for a GTR for a start.

If the engine was tired, and exhibiting low oil pressure already, 4100 wasnt a good solution.

What should the oil pressure be sitting on?

my engine let go on saturday night, and the pressure was on 2 on the gauge in the dash. I had just done an oil change 2 hours before hand using MOTUL 4100 turbolight (10W40 im pretty sure)

I used turbo light in my car and I got exactly the same symptoms (Minus the spun bearing)

I changed to Daves suggested penrite 5W60 and the oil pressure now behaves normally!

cool... Hmmm I'm still confused about what weight to use.

I'm guessing thicker is better (if the valves are making a little noise)... But 5w60 (recommended above) is thinner than 10w40 isn't it?

All I can find is 5w50 Mobil 1. Would that be a better oil to use than the Motul 4100 10w40?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...