Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just wondering...

when have you got the o/d button on?

is it on all the time?

or do you put it in overdrive after 80 or something?

i was driving around with it always on as the light on the dash annoy's me [O/D OFF]

but then today i decided to punt around with it off for a bit and i like the way the car drives/ sounds better.

So...

When do YOU use it....?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/116208-when-do-you-use-od/
Share on other sites

i drive around with o/d on all the time.

O/D is a fourth gear only selectable in 3rd gear via a 12V solenoid switch.

I too hate the light.

The reason the car sounded better was because at above 60km/h where it would be in O/D, the car was still in a lowered gear and made a better song.

I also use O/D when on the dyno to keep the car in 3rd gear.

I also use O/D when driving 170km/h+.....mainly because I've run out of 3rd by then :D

To be honest, Ive never taken O/D off on the road.

if you dont use OD all the time that means your engine is always operating at high rpms which equals to more fuel consumption

i alwasy use OD all the time with any cars.

Only disengage OD when i want a quicjker responses in gear change for over taking.

if you dont use OD all the time that means your engine is always operating at high rpms which equals to more fuel consumption

i alwasy use OD all the time with any cars.

Only disengage OD when i want a quicjker responses in gear change for over taking.

Incorrect, only at a speed above which the gear box would change up into fourth and then engage the lock up converter will you be using more fuel (higher RPM). True, that fouth would be engaged most of the time during normal driving, but that does not mean that the engine "revs harder" when overdrive is switched off.

To the smarties with manuals, enjoy peak hour won't you!

Cheers

Luke

Incorrect, only at a speed above which the gear box would change up into fourth and then engage the lock up converter will you be using more fuel (higher RPM). True, that fouth would be engaged most of the time during normal driving, but that does not mean that the engine "revs harder" when overdrive is switched off.

To the smarties with manuals, enjoy peak hour won't you!

Cheers

Luke

soz wat i meant was when you are in OD and if you disengages it it down shift to 3rd in turn higher rev. Just a matter of how much torque your car has. The more torque the less u need to change your geards.

This is especially true for a diesel engine.

Dont forget i have a trustworthy Landcruiser 100 series with 1hz rngine tuborcharged intercolled baby!! :)

Im always flicking between O/D on and off........ under 60kmph then I dont see a need of O/D, around 80 then yes, I have O/D on. Going up or down hills I keep O/D off.......... no problem using the gearbox for the way it was designed!

well thats a product to fix that jerking feeling when it changes gears though. especially in an auto.

Its the Nulon uto transmission additive. its really good. I put one in into my lancruiser auto trans when i had it for service and it totally smooth and it change into gears w/o the jerking feeling and very smooth. I recommend it. I even put the additive for the diff and the tranfer case and it cuts the cabin noise by half. I put it into the 2 diffs and the transfer case. it works wonders.

im planning to use the additive on my 260rs when its time to chaange the transmission and dill oil as well as the tranfer case.

Edited by stasis

The POWER button changes shift points and how long gears hold for (shift points really) it doesn't open up the 3 extra cylinders... Maybe it should be called "sport" mode not power?

As far as I know anyway...

Luke

  • 5 months later...

This chart is interesting. Which Series is this for Ian?

My S2 will do 125 kmh on the rev limiter in 2nd gear, quite a bit more then the 110 listed above.

Havent checked the upper limit of the other gears yet.

My series 2 (auto) has no "O/D off" button and no "power" button so I guess that makes the whole "do i leave it on or off?" thing pretty simple :thumbsup:

I think the rationale is that the tiptronic pretty much replaces the other two. Plus it will still hit power mode if I put my foot down hard. But I would prefer the option to use power mode and still have it change gears for me.

I read somewhere that power mode not only changes the shift points, it also makes the throttle more sensitive and generally "feels" more responsive. Thats how it worked on my turbo silvia anyway. :laugh:

I too leave it on all the time except when going down big hills that we have around here. When overtaking I just go, I like the rush between 70 and 140.

**thinking out loud ** ...u definately like speeding tickets and demerits too

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...