Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Boys and girls...

Firstlly let me start by saying thank you for coming along to the event. It was a pleasure to meet some of you for the first time. It was great also to meet up with some old timers also (Gorden). Special thanks to Richard at "All Star" from running the night. Also special thanks to all those who put their cars on the dyno for my personal enjoyment.

Thanks to Karen (SMR33) for coming along to sign up 2 new members.

Time for the results. (This will be updated as numbers come to hand, please pm me your numbers)

In running order.

1. Col-GTSX - No Record of this run!!!

IMG_1859.jpg

2. booosted33

155rwkw@170kph

978nm@134kph

IMG_1753.jpg

3. Rhinorebel

195rwkw@166kph

1287nm@136kph

IMG_1757.jpg

4. 666DAN

169rwkw@154kph

1185nm@126kph

IMG_1762.jpg

5. J-Boy

315rwkw@192kph

1735Nm@156kph

(Running Very Rich)

IMG_1778.jpg

6. N15mo

147rwkw@158kph

992nm@126kph

IMG_1779.jpg

7. r33skyliner

207rwkw@164kph

1407nm@124kph

(Running dangerouslly lean)

IMG_1783.jpg

8. R34GTX

176rwkw@162kph

1165nm@136kph

IMG_1794.jpg

9. Ryn26

157rwkw@154kph

1060nm@144kph

IMG_1801.jpg

10. bunta

178rwkw@158kph

1239nm@128kph

IMG_1806.jpg

11. Owned

196rwkw@172kph

1205nm@158kph

IMG_1809.jpg

12. Shaneo81

208rwkw@176kph

1318Nm@140kph

IMG_1812.jpg

13. R32 Driftah

167rwkw@158kph

1135nm@130kph

IMG_1826.jpg

14. gts25t4door

123rwkw@170kph

973nm@94kph

IMG_1830.jpg

15. Nathan - Username?

114rwkw@138kph

909nm@118kph

IMG_1839.jpg

16. Fish

102rwkw@142kph

771nm@126kph

IMG_1846.jpg

17. Luke - User name?

270rwkw@178kph

1655nm@144kph

IMG_1854.jpg

18. Col-GTSX

198rwkw@194kph

1434Nm@104kph

IMG_1859.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/116562-sau-qld-dyno-night/
Share on other sites

Please use this thread to continue chat about the everning... The other thread has become too full of useless info to make any sence...

Dont forget to PM me your numbers so i can update the overall list and add the figures to the DVD...

Thanks Col

My issue is sorted now ! The only problem I had was low oil preassure, I have since found out the oil I was using was too light and when it got hot it became far too thin! changed from 10w40 to 10w60 and problem solvered!!!

Apart from the oil I was pretty happy with how the car ran reved out nicely with no misfires or other carry on..happy with the torque too not bad for the stock turbo :worship:

The reason I need a few months is for bigger and better things :spank:

Its all updated guys... Final results are in...

Any update on what the Motec corrections meant??

No word yet but i will find out asap... All i can tell you is that 'boosted33' and I were both running on 3.75 motec correction and everyone else was higher than this number. I am assuming as this stage its a wheel spin compensator or traction setting. But i will get confirmation on this figure and what it means...

I was sent all the dyno sheet in an email today and i have to say that there are some cars out there in need of a tune... :D There are some really nice torque curves and nice power curves (from what i can see in the kw dept) but yeah interesting to see the difference inbetween shaneo81's car and mine. Being they are similar but with different turbos...

had a great night... was hapy with power figure... gonna get power fc soon so that should get theings happening... makes decent drift power. serves its purpose... nice to meet some more people!

So which car was yours... Sorry just wanta update the pics...

looks like an awesome night! wish i could have made it to this one

oh well.. next time i suppose

poeple who have their dyno figures above should also post their mods so we at least know how they correalte

as for this "motec correction" thing.. does this mean the dyno was reading high or low?

Warren

looks like an awesome night! wish i could have made it to this one

oh well.. next time i suppose

poeple who have their dyno figures above should also post their mods so we at least know how they correalte

as for this "motec correction" thing.. does this mean the dyno was reading high or low?

Warren

It reads lower than a Dynodynamics in shootout mode by about 10% but who knows what is "right" ;) stoopid dynos causing controversy since their inception :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
    • 9" wheels are a little too wide for a RWD 32. They can fit. People have put R33 GTR wheels on 32s for years and years. But they are a very tight squeeze. This has been known for about 30 years. As I said - there is no difference between a 17 and an 18 in terms of what will fit. The rolling diameter needs to stay about the same as stock - not very much larger. If you increase that, you will start to have problems. If you increae rolling diamater at the same time as yo increase width, you will have problems earlier. as 9" wheels are pushing the boundaries already, you would need to be careful with tyre choice. I would put 8.5s on the front of mine, but would expect problems with 9s.
    • post up screen shots of your injector tables
    • Diagnostic flow for a code 21 says check signal at the ECU pins, on a voltmeter of some kind it should read 0.1V at idle, 0.12V cranking, 0.15-0.25V at 2000 rpm. Check each coil such that +1, -3 is infinite or very high resistance, -3, +2 should do the same. (-1, +3), (+3, -2), (+1, -2), and (-1, +2) should all be somewhere between 0 ohms and high resistance. If you trace the path from the coil pin all the way back to the ECU in the diagram the resistance you measure at the coil vs connected to the harness should be pretty much the same. 
×
×
  • Create New...