Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 211
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Dont have any photos. I think i have some photos of my first Renault back in the 70s. Not even a photo of my old Brabus.

Reading through peoples comments, it appears my car may only be as quick as my old Brabus, but it feels quicker.

Edited by Sputnik

Hi guys, here are the results.

Please note: TBA results are still being looked at. The competition was very close in the TBA items so its going to come down to 100'ths of a second i think.

I'd prefer to give it full time to calculate and get it right, rather than post a false result.

Im flat knacker @ work so it should only be a couple more days ;)

cheers

STi

Fastest - Shiraz Ali Patel

Consistent - Shiraz Ali Patel

WRX

Fastest - Chris Sleeman

Consistent - Chris Sleeman

RWD Sky

Fastest - Pete Blythe

Consistent - TBA

GTR

Fastest - Aaron Panozza

Consistent - TBA

Intruder

Fastest - Ray Evans

Consistent - Tharaka Pathirage

Highest MPH

Ray Evans @ 133

Most Improved ET

Ben Winstone (GTR)

Sh|tbox

Winner - Tarago

Runner-up - Lada

Hi guys, here are the results.

Please note: TBA results are still being looked at. The competition was very close in the TBA items so its going to come down to 100'ths of a second i think.

I'd prefer to give it full time to calculate and get it right, rather than post a false result.

Im flat knacker @ work so it should only be a couple more days :)

cheers

STi

Fastest - Shiraz Ali Patel

Consistent - Shiraz Ali Patel

WRX

Fastest - Chris Sleeman

Consistent - Chris Sleeman

RWD Sky

Fastest - Pete Blythe

Consistent - TBA

GTR

Fastest - Aaron Panozza

Consistent - TBA

Intruder

Fastest - Ray Evans

Consistent - Tharaka Pathirage

Highest MPH

Ray Evans @ 133

Most Improved ET

Ben Winstone (GTR)

Sh|tbox

Winner - Tarago

Runner-up - Lada

Have you got the times??

ye, ill post that up when i got time.

First and foremost was the results, the timings and stuff are secondary.

Trophies and the like are @ the July CLub meeting as i stated @ heathcote

Again, sorry for the delay, 7days/50+ weeks is not working too well at the moment :(

dunno why my MPH was so high

neither do i... but cant argue as ALL your times were like that.

However one WRX ran mid 120mph, but he told me that couldnt be right as the car had never gotten over 110mph or something close to it.

I'll be having a word to Heathcote about thier timing as im a bit intrigued as to how accurate it is, or rather it is not.

I've had isues before, thre is no way i ran a 12.1 with 111mph, would have to be closer to 120mph+

Ill see what they come back with :rofl:

I've had isues before, thre is no way i ran a 12.1 with 111mph, would have to be closer to 120mph+

Ill see what they come back with :rofl:

That sounds about right dude. I ran my GTR on the weekend at Heathcote and ran a 12.8 @ 106mph.

My mates R32 GTR on one of his runs did a 13.3 @120mph (now thats a stuff up - that was the right side)

That sounds about right dude. I ran my GTR on the weekend at Heathcote and ran a 12.8 @ 106mph.

My mates R32 GTR on one of his runs did a 13.3 @120mph (now thats a stuff up - that was the right side)

But Ash has a Rwd R31, would have to have a wicked fast 60ft time for that....

But Ash has a Rwd R31, would have to have a wicked fast 60ft time for that....

A 12.6-12.8 qtr will be done with a 106-109mph quite easily in a awd car with a 60 ft of around 1.7sec. This my experiance anyway with Evo's, Wrx's, Liberty's and GTR's.

It seems with GTR's once you get in to 11 sec teritory a good 60ft is hard to get, due to the fine line of wheel spin and bogging down.

That's my 2 cents worth anyway :D

A 12.6-12.8 qtr will be done with a 106-109mph quite easily in a awd car with a 60 ft of around 1.7sec. This my experiance anyway with Evo's, Wrx's, Liberty's and GTR's.

It seems with GTR's once you get in to 11 sec teritory a good 60ft is hard to get, due to the fine line of wheel spin and bogging down.

That's my 2 cents worth anyway :D

My 60ft was a 1.86 (standard tyres - wheel spin). Your info is about spot on :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Has equal chance of cleaning an AFM and f**king an AFM. I think you can work out what happened. When the Hitachi ECU sees the AFM die and goes into the associated limp mode, then it will start and run just fine, because it ignores the AFM and just runs on idle maps that will do what it needs to get it going. But there is no proper load signal, so that's about all it can do. My suggestion? If you don't want to go full aftermaket ECU, then get some R35 GTR AFM cards and some housings to put them in, in the stock location, and Nistune the ECU. Better to do a good upgrade than just replace shitty 40 year old tech with the same 40 year old tech.
    • So my car was recently having trouble starting on initial crank, I would need to feather the gas for it to start up but besides that it would start and run fine. So I clicked the idle air control valve (with throttle body cleaner) and cleaned the MAF sensors (with MAF cleaner). The start up issue was fixed and now the car turns over without the assist of the throttle, but the car is in limp mode and wont rev past 2.5k RPM. From what I understand the IACV would not put the car in limp mode, so I am to believe it is the MAF sensors, but it was running fine before and now I cant get it out of limp mode. I cleaned the MAF made sure the o rings were seated properly. Made sure the cables were plugged in properly, the cables also both read the same voltage. Does anybody know why this is or what could be causing this or how to get it out of limp mode?
    • Ooo I might actually come and bring the kids, however will leave the shit box home and take the daily
    • Thanks. Yeah I realised that there's no way I'd be able to cover the holes with the filler, it would just fall through. Thanks again @GTSBoy!
    • That was the reason I asked. If you were going to be fully bodge spec, then that type of filler is the extreme bodge way to fill a large gap. But seeing as you're going to use glass sheet, I would only use that fibre reinforced filler if there are places that need a "bit more" after you've finished laying in the sheet. Which, ideally, you wouldn't. You might use a blob of it underneath the sheet, if you need to provide some support from under to keep the level of your sheet repair up as high as it needs to be, to minimise the amount of filler you need on top. Even though you're going bodge spec here, using glass instead of metal, the same rules apply wrt not having half inch deep filler on the top of the repair. Thick filler always ends up shitting the bed earlier than thin filler.
×
×
  • Create New...