Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well i'll be running an rb25 pfc in my rb24det using the rb20 loom and sensors in the next week, from what i can see of the wiring diagrams carl h is correct. should just bump and run.

when using one of these does all the options show correctly on the power fc controller?

i also was under the impression the series 2 ran different coils, the power fc's have the same part number so is that more wiring related?

in respect to the gtr power fc, from what i also understand it runs exactly the same pin out however the afm's need to be run in parallel and likewise with the oxy sensors. is this correct?

when we tried this on my buddies car it booted up fine and started right away, put it into the monitior mode and it displayed everything that would normaly be displayed on the rb25pfc.

played around with it and to check that the car was indeed running right lowered the revlimit to 1.5k and low and behold it cut at 1.5.

I think the RB25 PFC is a better bet for an RB20 than the GTR model, reason being that the RB20/25 share the same type of knock sensor (resonant) and the RB26 uses a flat response (non resonant) sensor.

The RB25 PFC is designed to work with the type of knock sensor that the RB20 has.

hey mate heres the pinouts for r32 rb26 ecu

rb26 ecu pinouts

are you sure this is correct? these pin outs are almost the same as the rb25 sheet here (incl the injector grounds which are different)

if you check the loom on rb20det.com you will see there is a difference between the rb20/20 det and i was always under the impression the r32 rb series had the same loom

POST EDITED

Loom is correct. I have the manual for ca18,rb20de,det,rb25de,rb26dett (r32) and it looks like that changing to a rb26 power fc you also need to swap 112 & 114 pins around + the rewiring of the afms etc

Edited by SirRacer

Using an rb26dett loom on an rb25de (r33 head) the differences are

Differences

* Wastegate valve control solonoid (dont see why u wont need it anyway)

* AFM Ground (wire afm in parallel and would be fine or dejetro)

* AFM Intake sensor front (depending on what one you use you could run 2 or wire as above, i think the 26 expects a different air temp sensor though)

* Intake air temp sensor

* Throttle valve switch (dont have a clue what this is but affects r32 also)

* Fuel pump terminal control output 1

* Fuel pump terminal control output 2

* Sub electrical fan relay

r32 rb25de(Loom is basically same as rb20det, however rb20 has a fuel control terminal volt control output and FICD solenoid input signal.

rb20/25de (r32) with r33 rb25 computer

Differences

* FICD solenoid input signal (not used by r33 computer or rb20det loom)

* Swapping of injectors to suit loom 112 & 114

* Throttle valve switch (isnt on r33 loom)

r33 rb25de loom is the same as rb25det

some things we may need to clarify( i think they are for the slushbox) so power fc wont support them anyway

* Throttle sensor output signal (Says to A/T C/U)

* Throttle valve switch power supply

* Intake air output signal (Says to A/T C/U)

* Engine A/T control input signal

Edited by SirRacer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...