Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Check this car up 4 auction out

Looks like a track car with all that widebody modifications, and allt he rollcages n stuff. Looks like its had a rear corner collision cos a chunk of the bodykit is missing on the bottom rear spoiler.

Mmmm looks vey nice. Wouldn't mind gettin that on mine :P (well if I ended up makin it any faster)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11735-whats-the-bodykit-on-this-monsta/
Share on other sites

lol omg that is the m's factory r32... well it looks like they've taken all the stickers off it. Coz even the wing is the same. Its in one of the drag video's I got. Looks exactly the same, but the wheels are different.

http://www.ms-factory.co.jp/democar.htm

Man, the stickers are in the same position and stuff as well... either sum1 made a real good replica or that is the real car... which means that's the M's Factory Drag SPL.

Fromt he website...

BEST TIME 9.140 sec

ENGINE

Camshaft TOMEI IN and EX280? 11.5 Cam cap volt/bolt

Cybernetic Anthropomorphic Machine professional ket HKS all aluminum cybernetic Anthropomorphic Machine professional ket

Valve STD

Valve spring TOMEI RB26hiDoubles pulling

Valve guide M ' S FACTORY phosphorus bronze (milling)

Seat ring ARM 50 alloy

Cylinder head M ' S FACTORY SPL port processing, combustion room processing and water jacket processing

Head gasket TOMEI 87 ƒÓ 1. 5mm grommet

Cylinder head bolt TOMEI strengthening cylinder head bolt

Piston TOMEI 86.5 cooling channel attaching titanium top

Connecting rod HKS H section

Crankshaft HKS full counter crankshaft

ƒƒ^ƒ‹ ƒjƒXƒ‚ strengthening metal

Crank pulley - HKS

Oil pump TRUST

Water pump STD

Oil pan TRUST

Timing belt TOMEI strengthening timing belt

Plug HKS racing Pro 10th

Fuel tank ATL 11.6 liter

Fuel pump BOSCH 044 x 2

ƒtƒ…[ƒGƒ‹ƒŒƒMƒ…ƒŒƒ^[ $$ln PAXTON

Fuel delivery flexible pipe TOMEI

Injector SARD 1000cc x 6

Surge tank M ' S FACTORYSTD reforming

Throttle body Infinity 90 ƒÓ

Air cleaner HKS funnel

Turbine HKS T51R? SPL

EX manifold HKS SUS

West gate HKS GT

Muffler M ' S FACTORY 100 ƒÓ Titanium

COOLING

Intercooler TRUST 3 layer

ƒ‰ƒWƒGƒ^[ $$ln M ' S FACTORY caloric rise

Headlight TOMEI headlight intake

POWER

Transmission HKS Ver ‡U

Clutch HKS triple plate

Diff. F CUSCO RS R TOMEI ƒeƒNƒjƒJƒ‹ƒgƒ‰ƒbƒNƒX 2way

Drive shaft F HKS strengthening drive shaft R STD

Transfer M ' S FACTORY strengthening transfer DRAG SPL

BODY

Body reinforcement Section spot increase

Body kit M ' S FACTORY R32 body kit

Hood M ' S FACTORY carbon hood, carbon general-purpose duct

Glass M ' S FACTORY ƒAƒNƒŠƒ‹ƒEƒBƒ“ƒhƒD $$ln

Door mirror MATSUSHOU

INTERIOR

Seat RECARO SP? G

Roll bar For CARROSSE SAFETY21 7PJ section race/lace

ƒ[ƒ^[ HKS boost gage, TRUST oil temperature gauge, oil pressure gauge, temperature gauge and nature pressure meter

CHASSIS

Shock absorber - M ' S FACTORY (ƒI[ƒŠƒ“ƒY reforming)

Suspension MERWEDE F5.8 R4.8

Tension rod M ' S FACTOR Y tension rod

Front upper arm M ' S FACTORY drug upper arm

Rear upper arm JIC

Rear arm M ' S FACTORY pyro arm

Rear member M ' S FACTORY full rigidity

Front brake Black line slit rotor

Wheel ADVAN RG 9. 5j? 17

Tire NITTO NT555 275/40? 17

J-Spec!!! Import it for me!!! lol

s14kingu-img320x240-1046348286cimg0020.jpg

s14kingu-img320x240-1046348237cimg0018.jpg

s14kingu-img320x240-1046348268cimg0019.jpg

There's a few subtle differences.. also the car on auction was sold as a GTS-t so meh, probably an eact replica by a die hard fan :P

wouldn't mind that kit... well if I had a faster R32.

if the back was smoothed out a bit, then it'd look the bizness...

found the website for the kit (and yes that includes the rear wing and bumper sticker lol no wonder they looked the same)

http://www.ms-factory.co.jp/partsdown.htm

Translated version: here

Altogether the kit costs 475000 Yen which is about $6,615 the car was sold for 500000 Yen

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...