Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

My mate just bought a 2002 model 200sx. It is fully standard and is automatic. I was reading that they go 0-100 in 5.6 seconds standard. I have a R32 manual and i read that they go 0-100 in 6.5 standard. The mods i have are:

R34 Turbo - Running on 7psi

Lighten Flywheel

3 Inch Excust

K&N Air Filter

Front Mount Intercooler

I was just wondering if you guys think I can beat him with the mods I have?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/117627-r32-skyline-vs-200sx/
Share on other sites

Personally i think it will come down to driver.. the auto will be quicker off the mark however it depends on how well you know to drive your car. stock 200sx has around the same rw/kw as a stock R32 however the RB20 should have more torque. The auto 200sx are pretty laggy until 4000rpm... Considering your mods you should be able to get him, if not let me drive your car :) hahaha just kidding... the only way to find out is down the 1/4 mile.

Regards,

Sarkis

You will chop him very very hard with those mods against an stock auto s15. You have manual vs auto, a bigger turbo and modifications done!

Standard the s15 sr20 would have quiet alot more torque than a standard rb20 though Sarkis.

Anyway go and find out mate, im sure you'll be happy with the results :)

Accordin to most dyno's and Nissans figures the sr20 has more torque, maybe due to more compression in the motor or 4 bigger pistons compaired to 6 smaller ones? Who knows but from what ive seen sr20 does have more torque (more noticable off boost than on)

actually remember that in australia the s15 sr20det was detuned from the factory. and in manuel form will do 6.34 and a standing quarter of 14.59.

Australian spec s15 has 147kw and 265nm of torque@48000rpm. Rb20 got few more KW's but same torque. S15 manuel weighs in at 1282kgs.

about the same asa 32

R32 Manuel will do 6.5 and 14.8 quarter. Expect only 0.1 to 0.2 seconds slower for the auto s15.

If your mate got rid of nissans state of detune he would be making 187kw and be running 13.8 quarters.

Youll woop him if you can drive properly if you got those mods you listed

They're no chance in hell a stock S15 can run 5.6 0-100km/h taking into account the car is an australian model and is auto.

The Jap S15 came with a ball-bearing T28 as opposed to the plain bearing of the Aus S15's.

Taking into account your mods I'd say you'd beat him easily. But mate why don't you just go out and have a run? Its all fun and let us know how you go.

Japanese spec S15 manuals ran 0-100 in about 5.6 as you stated - they have 184kw as standard. The Aussie cars were detuned to 147kw, and do 0-100 in low 6's in manual form. The auto's are slower again, with 0-100 in the 7's. A stock R32 GTST manual would chop a stock S15 auto very easily.

But then that raises another question - why are you running LESS boost than a stocker? Dunno too much about modifying cars, but your set up seems good for around 1 bar boost if you ask me! BOOST THAT SUCKER UP!!!

Edited by Big Rizza

Thanks Guys,

Ive ordered a boost controller and should be getting a new fuel pump in the next 18 days. My mate wants to have a drag in about 2 weeks so hopefully I will have it boosted when we drag. Although I should be able to win with it running on 7psi. I wont be happy if he does beat me. I might have to practice my take offs. Could i turn the boost up a bit without the bigger fuel pump?

Thanks

Yeah i will proberly run it on 10psi when i get the boost controller.

But then yesterday when I was driving the metal plate that holds my clutch in position snapped. So now i gotta take out the clutch pedal and cylinders to fix it all up. Hopefully it will be a easy job and somewhere will have the brackets to buy. Has anyone installed a Clutch pedal before?

My mate got his 200sx back the other day and wont take me for a drive. He has taken everyone else but me. I think he doesnt wanna show me how quick it is becasue it might be slower. Im pushing him to take me but my mates who have been in it say that mine is quicker anyways.

Also some how the bracket that holds my clutch twisted and snapped. Not sure if becasue it was mounted wrong or because the heavy duty clutch was to much pressure. I bought a new one which cost me $220, hopefully I wont have the same problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...