Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah. Not impressed. Very much hindering my mate hiring anyone...

Thet like to stop people with an actual job doing their job

I fail to see how being a f wit makes her less hot.

I work with a chick that is super hot, complete biatch, but hot none the less

When you hate every part of their style and attitude its hard to see anything else, dressing like a homeless mental patient with a camera really detracts from her look

Working in a lab doesnt make you geeky, and as some one that goes to labs I can tell you that there is nevery any hot ones in there. Accountants merely dress in professional attire, thats a different thing all together and ditto most librarians.

You are all living in a fantasy land! :P

actually accountants usually dress rather nicely. I'm an exception cause work on the GC but if I was to work say in Brisvegas Professional attire or get da boot

BTW hot female geeky accountants do exist ;)

So, what you're saying is that if we were to draw a Venn diagram with one circle covering hot geeky girls and another for who work in accounting, there would be no overlap?

Although, hawt bishess in corporate attire = fap time!

ur not wrong there

Thet like to stop people with an actual job doing their job

When you hate every part of their style and attitude its hard to see anything else, dressing like a homeless mental patient with a camera really detracts from her look

This is true and highly frustrating. Especially when the Partner has been looking for 2 months!

This is true and highly frustrating. Especially when the Partner has been looking for 2 months!

can you go above HR and speak directly to Partner outside work hrs (cant believe Im saying this)

can you go above HR and speak directly to Partner outside work hrs (cant believe Im saying this)

I spoke to the Partner directly this morning. Caught up for a coffee. This is where he said that he hadn't even seen the CV I sent through on the 12th of August. Problem we have is that HR have said that they will blacklist our company from working with theirs if we send candidates through to Partners directly. It's a shite situation to be in.

I spoke to the Partner directly this morning. Caught up for a coffee. This is where he said that he hadn't even seen the CV I sent through on the 12th of August. Problem we have is that HR have said that they will blacklist our company from working with theirs if we send candidates through to Partners directly. It's a shite situation to be in.

Why don't the partners tell their hr to pull their heads in?

so even if the Partner recommends (on his own account) HR a candidate they wont even consider it????

They will. They don't like us talking to Partners directly. It could result in not getting paid and being black listed from the firm.

Because you have to be gentle and precious with HR. They're the ones that WILL sue if anything goes wrong...

Thats a bit rich mate. If they accept a candidate via normal channels and things go wrong they can sue you?

I would be inclined to get lawyers to review your paper work Tony if that's the case and protect you from such potential litigation

Thats a bit rich mate. If they accept a candidate via normal channels and things go wrong they can sue you?

I would be inclined to get lawyers to review your paper work Tony if that's the case and protect you from such potential litigation

No no no no no!!

I was saying that if they tell HR to pull their socks up and it isn't done in the right way, HR will sue the firm for wrongful termination, harassment etc. They're like that at times.

No no no no no!!

I was saying that if they tell HR to pull their socks up and it isn't done in the right way, HR will sue the firm for wrongful termination, harassment etc. They're like that at times.

Ok, good. Had me worried there for a bit.

Internal HR can be a double edged sword IMO and in general can add little value to businesses (they are the first to go when redundancies take place in large organisations which is ironic)

But hey I don't make the rules.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • After using a protractor for an actually accurate assessment of what is required,  and by NOT using my uncalibrated eyeball I worked out I need a 25° silicone bend from the TB ro the MAF, but, my choice was either a 30° or a 23° (23° is a weird spec), so I grabbed the 23° one from Raceworks I also grabbed 1mtr of 3" straight from Just Jap, I needed 350mm, but they only had 300mm, or 1mtr lengths....meh Also ordered a 1/2" hose bulkhead fitting from fleabay, this has a smoothish mushroom looking head (they are designed for below the water line of boats) that will fit inside the bend, the hose bit and threaded bit looks to long, but nothing that a hacksaw cannot fix if required, the hose will then just get jamed on the threaded bit up to the retaining nut Fingers crossed and the unsightly amount of hose clamps will be reduced down to 4 once all the parts arrive 
    • Oil change does not trigger code 21. Code 21 is for coilpacks primary side connection. You can try to clear the code with a battery disconnect, hold down the brake pedal to drain capacitors through the brake lights with the ignition on for 10-15 seconds before you reconnect the battery. I have seen R35 coil conversion permanently cause this code with no ill effects so it might be the resistance it wants to see isn't quite right on one or more coilpacks. Could be inside the ECU, could be the harness, could be a coil. You can test it all if you want or just ignore until the car actually starts misfiring.
    • I forgot you have a Nistune ECU. Use Nistune to do all the tests I mentioned instead of faffing with 30+ year old electrical connectors. You can read MAF volts off that too, there are reference values in the service manual to tell you roughly what it should be in different conditions.
    • No. I think it might be the AFM. Hence the use of the terms "swaptronics", which implies the use of swapping out electronics for the purpose of diagnosis. It's about the only way to prove that a small/niggling/whatever problem with an AFM or a CAS or similar is actually caused by that AFM/CAS/whatever. A known good item swapped in that still gives the same problem is likely to be caused somewhere else. They're all the same. Spraying AFMs with cleaner is an each way bet between cleaning it and f**king it.
    • Oh wow! This might actually work amazingly. Do you know the ratio of the diff? I was told the only thing you need to make sure of is if the front & rear diff ratios are the same. Ours is a 4.083 Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...