Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As the title says here is a dyno sheet for a set gt-rs's on a 2.9l gtr engine. It needs bigger injectors as you can see it hasn't fallen over yet. Will post another sheet once the bigger injectors go in.

all the usual mods have been done, including these relavant ones;

gt-rs turbos

uas extrude honed manifolds

ces race style dumps and front pipe

trust tr exhaust

hks 280 10.7 intake, 288 11.0 exhaust cams

1mm o/s intake valves

cnc ported head

cp forged pistons

eagle h beam rods

stroker crank

power fc

z 32 afms

any questions just ask.

this run is at 16 pounds, pump fuel and injectors at max duty cyclepost-9006-1149294536.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/120686-rb26-gt-rs-dyno-result/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Nice result, but as per the above posts I agree that you have more power to come as the curve is still rising.

You have a similar setup to me Gav's Dyno Graph, however note that I have shorter final gears from a GTS4, so a direct km/h comparison isn't possible.

I still have some mixed emotions over the GT-RS terbs, however it is apparent (to me at least) that to get the best from these turbs on a 2.8L you still need to get some serious airflow through the engine. Big revs, high lift/long duration cams (I'm changing my Step 2 264 IN to a 270 duration) and head porting really makes a difference.

Good luck and drop me a PM if you want to chat.

Cheers

Gav

hey guys, to answer some of the questions, its a modified rb 30 crank, eagle rb26 rods, this may sound strange but i dont even know what BP on that dyno chart means (im an engine machinist, and know very little about dyno set up), only just got the car back so not sure what rpm it hits full boost at but ill let you know.

BP is the barometric pressure. The usual is around 101 or there abouts. At a lower atmospheric BP, the engine will make less power due to the decreased density of the air. So with a lower BP, Shootout mode will correct the reading (ie inflate it) to match what the engine would make at roughly 101 (or whatever the Shootout mode considers standard). So like the temperature probe, false readings can give misleading dyno results. Ie low BP = increased power just like high ITs = increased power.

Anyways nice power man, keep up the good work. Once its finalised it must be a real beast, not that it isnt now already! And yeah, more details please!

I modified the crank, so that i could use a 26 block, instead of an rb 30 block, so that all the outside components would fit up with out modification. The pistons are a custom order, with 22mm pin, the only rod modificatonn, is re-bushing to 22mm pin

Very interesting. So I assume you offset ground the crank to de stroke it a bit? Did you hardchrome it first, or are you running custom big end shells?

Was there enough meat in the ringlands to run such a low pin height (and 22mm pins)?

The crank is de-stroked slightly, and heavily modified, using std rb26 shells (rb30 big ends are larger than rb26). Yeah the ring lands are fine, the pin is high, but no higher than on a lot of other long stroke engies. Details on the crank mods sound vague, but i dont have exact measurments of what i did. i made templates of the shapes i made everything so i can do it again, and am in the process of figuring out if i can offer the conversion at an economical price (there are a lot of hours of labour in the modifications). To do all the mods you need a lathe, mill, crank grinder and engine balancer. But should still be able to do something vastly cheaper than japanese alternatives.

Edited by mark99

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks everyone for the replies and suggestions. Got the seats out (hoping I could find some existing grommets but no such luck). By tapping and measuring etc. I could figure out where I could drill through if needed. But first I borrowed an inspection camera and managed to go through factory holes in the chassis rail and could see that the captive nut was holding steady which is why it could retighten. So it was indeed a stripped section of thread, so I applied downforce by levering the bolt head with a screwdriver and went slowly back and forth until it came out. Camera helped a lot cos I could monitor that the captive nut was holding tight. Now I just have one very seized main subframe nut to tackle 😅
    • BOVs do have a purpose, if you ever log pressure before and after the throttle body, you will see a spike pre throttle on lift off from a WOT condition. Enough to bend throttle blades / damage e-throttle motors or simple assist in blowing off cooler pipes. FWIW, the above on really applies to those running at least 2 bar of boost. OP shouldn't have an issue, on the other hand, here are some videos of my shit box over a decade ago with some succulent dose with the airbox on and off. That shit box is unrecognisable these days 🫠    
    • I've tried all different combinations of BOVs/ no BOV and stock bypass valves over the years, on gear changes the stock bypass valve seems to get the car back on boost quicker because in part the turbos wheel speed isn't being slowed down by reversion, although they have issues holding boost much over the stock setting. Most aftermarket BOVs you can adjust the spring, tighter will make it open later and close sooner, but in my experience it'll cause a bit of flutter at low load/rpm anyway. I've also got some input into this whole no bov causing turbo wear, never had an issue on any on my turbos HOWEVER, I got my R33 GTST with 200k kms on it, with from what I can see still has the original turbo, no lateral shaft play but has about 4-5mm of play in and out which to me seems like a worn thrust bearing from years (100-150k kms?) of turbo flutter running no bov, so maybe there is some truth to it in the long run. But that'll never stop me loving the Stutututu while I have the car.   OP just wants to know if he can run a atmo vented BOV with no major issues and the answer is YES, plenty of people do it, there's no harm in installing it and seeing how it runs before spending $$$ on an aftermarket ecu, last time I bought a Nistune it was $2400 for install and a tune , unsure of todays prices but you get me. Crazy money to spend just to fix the minor inconvenience of stalling that can be overcome by letting the revs come down to near idle before putting the clutch in or a little bit of throttle to avoid it. You're better off leaving the ecu and tune for after a bigger turbo/injectors have been installed to take full advantage of the tune and get your moneys worth.   Let OP have his Whoosh sound without trying to break his bank haha
    • I see you missed the rest of the conversation where they have benefits, but nothing to do with avoiding breaking turbos, which is what the aftermarket BOV made all the fan boys, tuners, and modders believe was the only purpose for them...
    • But they do so for the other reasons to have a compressor bypass. It's in the name.
×
×
  • Create New...