Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That was another point mentioned, however when questioned, he said he does not even know what that means, and he is ignorant in that topic.

I get called terrorist all the time, so i dont think something like that should really upset a person. Let's wait and see when it all comes out in the open. Materazzi should be banned if it was a racist or attack on his family comment. No one needs to bring things like that on to the field.

  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

yeh true. but how can u not know what a terrorist means? where has he been for the last 30 years?!

my five year sister calls indians with the things on their heads terrorists all the time lol even at the shops when they are standing there lol

C'mon dezz. Admit it, the guy is a human being just like you and I. Regardless what status he is, or how many millions he is playing in front of. Such insults like that cannot be ignored. Maybe you should focus on the low life act of the italian player rather than zidane's response :P

Guest IH8VEE8S
just like eric cantona? lol

lmao still got that clip on my computer, but cantona fly kicked a fan lol then wanted to beat him up some more :P

lol dezz come on man if this is true then materazzi should be banned from playing football and made to apologize to zizou coz because of him zidane ended his last match EVER with a red card. if thats not doggish i don't know what is.

zidane could've just dobbed materazzi in but he didn't, proves what kinda person he is :D italian players should learn a thing or 2 from him

my point is, if he reacts like that when baited, then materazzi got exactly what he wanted out of the situation (if thats what actually happened...which hasn't been confirmed) the body language of materazzi just before zidane turned around doesnt suggest he said what that brazillian TV show said he did.

either way, italy won the world cup fair and squaure....who gives a f**k about zidane in this case :P

i was reading the paper today, and there is a dick who wrote in the editorial saying that the italians cheated their way towards the world cup victory? how? they didnt lose a game and only conceded one goal, if u dont count zaccardo's own goal against the usa.

hehe dont let it get to you jarryd...jealousy makes people say some real stupid shit...all of which ive been listening to endlessly from countless people

They can't accept the fact that the italians quite possibly have THE BEST DEFENSE in the world, backed up by the worlds best goal keeper.

FORZA AZZURI! 4 TIMES WORLD CHAMPIONS!

A million dollars for the guy who created this:

http://www.grrrey.com/tmp/zidane.html

If only i can have my pic up there instead of zidanes

Sorry dezz :P

thats ok...

203224.jpg

as for the quote in your sig, i saw the referee speak to the linesman, and then issue the red card...Unless someone else has the footage to prove the 4th official told the match ref about the incident...?

But FIFA spokesman Andreas Herren denied there had been a de facto use of video evidence in this case.

"The fourth official saw it as it happened on the pitch and directly advised the referee and the referee took action. Full stop," he said.

"It appears the referee was waiting for the situation to clear up a little bit before taking action."

Materazzi's agent, Claudio Vigorelli, added: "I've known Marco for a long time and I don't think he is capable of provoking a player, he is a good boy."

That's gotta be the quote of the century.

Materazzi has serious issues: "But Materazzi is no angel. Footage from earlier in the match showed him twisting Zidane's nipple."

who cares what Materazzi said? Materazzi could be ashamed of it, but not punished by FIFA, as he has done what's done on pitches for years. Like people have stated this sort of thing happens at every match and Zidane, a veteran, shouldnt have reacted. He only has himself to blame. Materazzi knew what he was doing, and got what he wanted.... Its more or less the same as what Ronaldo did to Rooney, you push a players buttons and sometimes they snap. It happens...

I've heard a couple of defenders telling our striker once that they were gonna 'gang rape' his grilfriend-not nice but said to provoke a reaction...

It's up to the player to rise above that sort of sh*t...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...